Are you really fine with IC voltage regulators ?

Account Closed
Joined 2010
As this topic is Ginetto61 topic who was kind to send me a Nakamichi CA50 manual who's regulators happened to be very interesting for me i'll just show one that i finished today with some small modifications as i started with one design ,ended with another and didn't want to change the mods.I used Didden's idea for a green led refference biased with some j112 j-fet current sources of 2ma instead of the original Nakamichi 0.6v diode biased at 600ua , but i run te same bias current for the sziklai pair bias: 1.8ma by using a 1kohm emitter resistor which gives slighty higher noise, but better linearity for the current source biasing the sziklai pair.
Thus i'm finishing a trio of voltage regulators,one +-30v,one +-20v andone +-10v that will be cascaded and supplied from a voltage quadrupler giving about +-43 v unloaded .The heatsinks aren't really needed as the multiplier can't hold those 40...43v for more than 200ma .
 

Attachments

  • nakamichi-ca50regulator.png
    nakamichi-ca50regulator.png
    126.2 KB · Views: 272
  • 20200920_235936.jpg
    20200920_235936.jpg
    1,018.7 KB · Views: 261
  • 20200921_000021.jpg
    20200921_000021.jpg
    998.9 KB · Views: 225
  • 20200921_000327.jpg
    20200921_000327.jpg
    1,006.8 KB · Views: 238
Last edited:
Account Closed
Joined 2010
I just wanted to make sure that the LED has a constant current through it but the base current of q403/407 needs to be noise free too as those transistors are providing the current to the output sziklai all the time.There's no feedback from the output and thus no start up ... just a continuous start up :)
 
I just wanted to make sure that the LED has a constant current through it but the base current of q403/407 needs to be noise free too as those transistors are providing the current to the output sziklai all the time.There's no feedback from the output and thus no start up ... just a continuous start up :)
The current through D409,410,411,412 (or LEDs) doesn't come from the R401 but via ZD402-Q408 for D409,410 and ZD401-Q404 for D411,412.That are the currents from the sources Q407,Q403 minus the base currents Q406,Q402.
Mona
 
www.hifisonix.com
Joined 2003
Paid Member
A 7815 can be used with a split winding transformer to provide both + and - regulated outputs and features wide band output Johnson noise of around 150uV RMS. If you use local filtering (22 Ohm and 100uF for example) around the opamps, the HF noise RTI of the opamp input is very very low - on a good opamp it will be pico Volts.

That leaves the LF noise. But there the opamp PSRR is very high, so you are still left with negligible noise RTI.

You can reduce line level ripple by putting a cap multiplier aka ripple eater in front of the regs. I am feeding in about 10 mV pk - pk into mine so the regulator line level ripple is single digit uV. The input ripple to the cap multiplier is about 500 mV pk to pk.
 
Account Closed
Joined 2010
The current through D409,410,411,412 (or LEDs) doesn't come from the R401 but via ZD402-Q408 for D409,410 and ZD401-Q404 for D411,412.That are the currents from the sources Q407,Q403 minus the base currents Q406,Q402.
Mona
Yes, you are true about the original design...i just left the jfets there because i started with a different regulator in mind , switched to this one , then just thought that they can't harm as removing them is quite a problem due to this type of pcb i am working on , but i agree they are kind of useless due to q404/408. Now the start-up sequence is suspended due to continuous bias done by the j-fets.I might remove them later if i consider so.The green LED are actually in parallel with some 5v1 zeners as removing the zeners now from that pcb is a horrible task.
 
Last edited:
Account Closed
Joined 2010
The current through D409,410,411,412 (or LEDs) doesn't come from the R401 but via ZD402-Q408 for D409,410 and ZD401-Q404 for D411,412.That are the currents from the sources Q407,Q403 minus the base currents Q406,Q402.
Mona
In the end i needed to revert back to the original design as the fets weren't equal and the voltage multiplier couldn't hold the +-43 v under 250ma load, dropping to 31v leading the regulator to go down to +-26v instead of +-29.
 
way (50...60mhz output transistors as unfortunately 80-90 MHZ- output transistors

Allow me to split some hairs. It is MHz. Mega = 10^6; m = 10^-3.
Herz is a person's name so must be capitalized. ;-)

Jan

Yes, I have to teach the younger ones at my company that the general rule (universal?) is that if the unit is named after a person, it is capitalized. Volt, Ampere, Watt, Hertz, Henry, Farad, Joule, etc. 'k' is lower case for kilo, 'K' upper case for Kelvin. I hv to get the model guys to stop using upper case K for resistors in LTspice in the macromodels.
 
Account Closed
Joined 2010
In the end i needed to revert back to the original design as the fets weren't equal and the voltage multiplier couldn't hold the +-43 v under 250ma load, dropping to 31v leading the regulator to go down to +-26v instead of +-29.
final measurements: 29.2v into 150 ohm load with an input voltage from the quadrupler of +-34v which is good enough for me.I won't probably use more than 100ma in all the circuits i need to supply.
 
Yes, I have to teach the younger ones at my company that the general rule (universal?) is that if the unit is named after a person, it is capitalized. Volt, Ampere, Watt, Hertz, Henry, Farad, Joule, etc. 'k' is lower case for kilo, 'K' upper case for Kelvin. I hv to get the model guys to stop using upper case K for resistors in LTspice in the macromodels.

Only the abbreviation (unit symbol) gets capitals, not the whole word. So the unit kelvin named after Lord Kelvin has unit symbol K, the unit volt named after Volta has unit symbol V and so on.