AD797 Clone people! Who can make a better one.

Jump to Latest
#82
797~3.jpg
IMG_20240305_150220~2.jpg
tried this and working , used transistor bc547c / bc557c / 2sc4793 /2sa1837, out low implidence can play small speaker, or headphones 🤣 offset made using 2k potential meter parallel with 800ohm -0.3mv 👍
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20240305_142149~3.jpg
    IMG_20240305_142149~3.jpg
    540.5 KB · Views: 192
  • Like
Reactions: lineup
#85
MrAK87 said:
Made this , Circuit working, it has only one problem, whenever I remove input signal,getting dc9v plus out and when connecting signal from phone jack it's become 1.8mv offset and works, why without signal or any input connection getting DC out and circuit not working 🤔 any fix?
Click to expand...
Hi MrAK87,

Since you were brave enough to try the given schematic, I must warn you that the circuit is not stable... To achieve minimum stability for a gain of ~6 (1+5k9/1k2), modify the existing pcb as given in the attachments (depending on the used transistors). Good luck...
 

Attachments

  • Like
Reactions: lineup and Deleted member 550749
#87
aparatusonitus said:
Hi MrAK87,

Since you were brave enough to try the given schematic, I must warn you that the circuit is not stable... To achieve minimum stability for a gain of ~6 (1+5k9/1k2), modify the existing pcb as given in the attachments (depending on the used transistors). Good luck...
Click to expand...
It's working and better offset +0.6mv and sound is very good , thanks for the schematic 🙏
♥️👏👍😊
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20240308_142012~2.jpg
    IMG_20240308_142012~2.jpg
    618.1 KB · Views: 138
  • IMG_20240308_142327~5.jpg
    IMG_20240308_142327~5.jpg
    659.9 KB · Views: 145
  • Like
Reactions: lineup
#89
Hi Mark,

My intention was to provide the guys/gals with a sufficiently stable AD797 discrete concept and that at this initial stage meant sacrificing something to get something else...so I purposely sacrificed the noise performance with 100R on the differential emitters to get a decent GM of about 23dB and PM of 68dB for a gain of ~6 and keep the compensation capacitor values low enough to get good enough THD numbers to make the exercise worthwhile.

EDIT: I ran the simulation again with and without the 100R degenerate resistors to see the difference in stability...seems like I didn't gain much in terms of stability and added unnecessary noise in the process, so it looks like they can be safely removed/bypassed...thx Mark.

For anything more than that (something remotely approaching the performance of the monolithic AD797 in terms of noise, THD, unity gain stability, thermal stability, clipping, SR, etc...) well...that's a whole different game and not everyone is up to the challenge.
 

Attachments

  • AD797 v.1.4.asc with 100R degeneration.png
    AD797 v.1.4.asc with 100R degeneration.png
    68.2 KB · Views: 101
  • AD797 v.1.4.asc without 100R degeneration.png
    AD797 v.1.4.asc without 100R degeneration.png
    67 KB · Views: 100
#90
lineup said:
AD797 is very good, but it is not unique.
For exanple AD847 and AD8021 uses the same folded cascode idea.

View attachment 1280469View attachment 1280470
Click to expand...
The uniqueness in the AD797 is the neutralisation cap Cn - this is NOT negative feedback, it is positive feedback.
By balancing the neg and pos feedback it gets it extremely low distortion.
There's articles on the 'net to explain this Scott Wurcer genius design.
If you don't 'get' this basic point, how can you 'clone' that opamp??

Jan
 
  • Like
Reactions: nfsgame, tubesguy, soundbloke and 1 other person
#91
jan.didden said:
The uniqueness in the AD797 is the neutralisation cap Cn - this is NOT negative feedback, it is positive feedback.
By balancing the neg and pos feedback it gets it extremely low distortion.
There's articles on the 'net to explain this Scott Wurcer genius design.
If you don't 'get' this basic point, how can you 'clone' that opamp??

Jan
Click to expand...
I am mystified too why the "floating current mirror" is included without this local feedback loop included. Maybe I am missing something?
 
  • Like
Reactions: lineup
#96
gugol said:
AD797: what a nice scheme!

Hello,
I was attracted by the elegance of the AD797 schematic (well, the simplified schematic only is available) and so I decided to reproduce it on LTSpice.
Here my interpretation, maybe one day I will make it as discrete one:
any opinion?
Click to expand...
Hi ! bravo ! it looks different from the simplified schematic by the way
did you sim it maybe ?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom