As soon as I have the "bend to arc" feature, as I believe this physical attribute is essential and cannot be substituted by delays.Please show us, I have my doubts... I don't think it will be as pretty as in the brochure...
(at least not with life size drivers)
Last edited:
Tried with the array0.txthttps://www.at-horns.eu/release/ath-beta-221114.zip
Two examples attached. You can export FRD data for the individial array groups and than work with that in any crossover simulator (see array1.txt demo). Or you can also work within ABEC manually on the script level (the most simple is to overwrite individual levels and/or delays in observation.txt).
- No LF source/enclosure support yet.
Importing whole ABEC project
ERRORS ------------------------
Missing "Control_Solver"
Made my day!
I get same error with "missing control solver" while importing in Akabak. Anyway I get the bare basics imported thats enough.
If I want to try another source shape (rectangular) how to define it? source shape=1 and how to define width/height? I once crafted a segmented AMT driver....maybe resurrection of that project now
I get same error with "missing control solver" while importing in Akabak. Anyway I get the bare basics imported thats enough.
If I want to try another source shape (rectangular) how to define it? source shape=1 and how to define width/height? I once crafted a segmented AMT driver....maybe resurrection of that project now
another source shape (rectangular) how to define it? source shape=1
rectangle would be amazing too! Using 3.1.7 b97 here
AKABAK (3.1.7 b97) - current download versionLimacon: what is 3.1.7 b97???
It's fascinating how rapidly it falls apart around 10 kHz. Partly it may be due to the BEM resolution but I guess this is basically how CBT behaves for the given c-c distance.
The bad news is that the simulation took almost 1.5 hour, despite only some 1700 BEM elements. That's probably due to the high number of separate sources (?).
The bad news is that the simulation took almost 1.5 hour, despite only some 1700 BEM elements. That's probably due to the high number of separate sources (?).
Last edited:
@limacon: same Akabak version.
For your center-center spacing that sound real. Thats why I tried the segmented AMT a while ago as distance between single driven elements is then virtually nothing.
Another solution to that problem would be the waveformers for compression drivers. Here you can basically form any shape of the wavefront desired:
https://www.production-partner.de/test/test-ks-audio-cpd18/#VAL
https://ks-audio.com/valtec
Also a non-symmetrical bending is possible that way. Then also above 10kHz you could get nice results.
For your center-center spacing that sound real. Thats why I tried the segmented AMT a while ago as distance between single driven elements is then virtually nothing.
Another solution to that problem would be the waveformers for compression drivers. Here you can basically form any shape of the wavefront desired:
https://www.production-partner.de/test/test-ks-audio-cpd18/#VAL
https://ks-audio.com/valtec
Also a non-symmetrical bending is possible that way. Then also above 10kHz you could get nice results.
Wine?It's fascinating how rapidly it falls apart around 10 kHz. Partly it may be due to the BEM resolution but I guess this is basically how CBT behaves for the given c-c distance.
The bad news is that the simulation took almost 1.5 hour, despite only some 1700 BEM elements. That's probably due to the high number of separate sources (?).
https://d1o0i0v5q5lp8h.cloudfront.n...uments/Altra_Max_Rev_A1_DS_v1.05_20220728.pdf
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Multi-Way
- Acoustic Horn Design – The Easy Way (Ath4)