About midrange driver choice in a 3-ways speaker

OB bass doesn't work well in a small listening room. You need lots of cone surface area for decently low cutoff. It can get expensive and complex to predict what it will do or sound like. A sealed box with a large driver is always going to sound better than a small driver in a ported box with a higher Fs. The further down you get with Fb, the cleaner the bass, mainly being above the phase shift area with the majority of bass response. A smaller box with higher Fb will put the resonance and phase shift right in the middle of the bass response, which will be hard to predict how it interacts with the room and will hurt the impulse response ie muddy or boomy bass.

If you want OB bass done well, a SLOB arrangement works best, but you have to treat it as a subwoofer. That's mainly because it can't be crossed too high due to slot and cavity resonances from the driver arrangement.

I don't believe in scolding someone based on their lack of knowledge and personal opinion formed from their own practical experience and journey. If you know what you want and like, it shouldn't be hard to get the results you're after with help of others on this forum. Its ok to disagree with others who try to push their own opinions and believe they're better than the person they're trying to advise.

I'd rather listen and dispense advice based on what I believe is a suitable solution for their situation, not mine. Its ok to liek and dislike something, but don't bash it because its not something you personally don't like or agree with. Belittling someone who comes across as inexperienced is juvenile and tells me they're dispensing information based on ego rather than generosity.
don't be too severe ,with 8" good driver in ob in small room can be quite happy like a good 5" reflex or mediocre 6.5" ....there is a lot of people happy for shoes box with kef b110 on LS 3/a go figure
 
  • Like
Reactions: ginetto61
I am sure 120% about this No doubts Even if these conclusions are wrong i am confident anyway

Much of it is nonsense but if you are happy with it then that is what matters for a hobby. A driver that is low passed at 200 Hz is a woofer not a subwoofer and that will have been confusing people. You are simply describing putting a woofer in it's own cabinet which is generally a good thing because high quality woofer cabinets and high quality mid/tweeter cabinet have different design requirements. Subwoofers in reasonable high fidelity systems will be typically lowpassed at 60-80 Hz since they will be locatable if crossed higher in frequency. If you wish to implement various forms of directivity and/or not pressurising the room at low frequencies a common and flexible way to do it is with 2 subs next to each other with controls set appropriately. This enables monopole, dipole and cardioid to be tried in a room. The non-monopole directivities are created by cancelling sound and so you will need bigger subwoofers to achieve the same SPLs as a normal monopole subwoofer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ginetto61
don't be too severe ,with 8" good driver in ob in small room can be quite happy like a good 5" reflex or mediocre 6.5" ....
i dont understand why you compare a good 8" to a "mediocre 6.5"
Given a good 8" (that is what i will end using) will a OB provide a lower distortion at the same SPL and Hz than a rightly designed closed/reflex box ?
that is the question ...
there is a lot of people happy for shoes box with kef b110 on LS 3/a go figure
not me A friend has a pair that he loves deeply For me they are caponized
 
Hello,
I build speakers since over 30 years and what I found out was that ~10% of the final result is design decision and 90% is crossover tuning. And in most cases the first ideas was not the best. So dont't care too much about the design and spend more effort into the implementation.
I had the same question with my combination 22W / 12MU / D3004 and actually I have the crossover at 600Hz / 3kHz with a great result. I planned to try a lower 300/3000 but didn't realised it up to now because its so fine actually...

My finings to midrange domes (Thiel/Accuton C44): There can be achived a very good result, but if you are even a little bit off in the tuning its quite terrible. In comparison the 12MU was very tame.

Regards, Jean-Claude
 
i dont understand why you compare a good 8" to a "mediocre 6.5"
Given a good 8" (that is what i will end using) will a OB provide a lower distortion at the same SPL and Hz than a rightly designed closed/reflex box ?
that is the question ...

not me A friend has a pair that he loves deeply For me they are caponized
OB give enjoy of music not performance ,you must understand this first then with the rigth $$ you can have better performance too
 
  • Like
Reactions: ginetto61
When you look at it from a commercial point of view, every person has a rear end, and there's a seat for every a$$, making everyone a customer for something.

Plenty of people are happy with the LS3/5 as a suitable speaker for their needs. I'm not one of them, as I don't consider this a full bandwidth solution. For me, satisfying bass needs to go down to at least the mid 30s, preferably mid 20s, but as our brains can reconstruct the missing low end based on the higher harmonics, smaller speakers are capable of conveying alot of typical music this way being that an electric string bass has louder 2nd harmonics than the fundamental tones. That.makes a speaker which only goes down to 82 hz capable of conveying a 41 hz low E on a 4 string bass.

You definitely need at least an 8 inch driver to reproduce sub frequencies at a satisfying level. A single 6 inch won't cut it and will be woefully inefficient if its a long stroke design, making power compression a real issue, especially in a relatively small sealed box. A transmission line with an 8 inch driver can sound good if dampened properly. I've heard a few designs like this which gave me a good representation of low end, even with pipe organ music and higher dynamic range classical. For something like EDM you'll need way more low end output capability for satisfying results (at least for my tastes).

Classical pieces like Stravinsky's Rite of Spring really need lots of cone surface area just to authoritively convey the lower midrange bandwidth of the percussion, strings and brass, let alone the full low end demanded by the bass drums in this piece. A small bookshelf 2 way speaker will be miserably disappointing when tasked to reproduce this material.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ginetto61
Much of it is nonsense but if you are happy with it then that is what matters for a hobby. A driver that is low passed at 200 Hz is a woofer not a subwoofer and that will have been confusing people. You are simply describing putting a woofer in it's own cabinet which is generally a good thing because high quality woofer cabinets and high quality mid/tweeter cabinet have different design requirements.
Hi yes ! exactly what i meant I do not like subs at all but i like deep and strong bass I think that subs are mostly for HT and special effects
But i wonder if a sub can be used not only for the very low bass but also up to 150Hz ... from there a 2 way can take care of the remaining job
Very good subwoofers have impressive freq response, very low distortion at high SPLs ... all good things I do not know if there are good passive subs
Most of them are powered.

Subwoofers in reasonable high fidelity systems will be typically lowpassed at 60-80 Hz since they will be locatable if crossed higher in frequency.
If you wish to implement various forms of directivity and/or not pressurising the room at low frequencies a common and flexible way to do it is with 2 subs next to each other with controls set appropriately. This enables monopole, dipole and cardioid to be tried in a room. The non-monopole directivities are created by cancelling sound and so you will need bigger subwoofers to achieve the same SPLs as a normal monopole subwoofer.
Thanks a lot but this i dont understand I am interested a lot in subs because they are a woofer in a separate cabinet as i would like to do
If i had already a 3 way i would take out the mid and the tweeter and place them in a separate box or even baffle like in the DQ10 Mechanically isolated from the box with the woofer. And i would brace and increase the mass of the box. And i am sure i would end with a much better sound
When i hear some designers say that a speaker box must resonate i cannot believe to my ears One thing is a musical instrument where the box acts as a sound box another thing is a loudspeaker where the box should be silent One thing is to generate a sound another one to reproduce it
When i added weigth to my speakers at some point it seemed like they were disconnected from the amp At the point that i checked that
It was surprising The sound was completely detached from the speakers So much more than before the increase of mass
Unfortunately lead that is a God's gift to increase mass and dampen is very toxic It costs also nothing
 
Hello,
I build speakers since over 30 years and what I found out was that ~10% of the final result is design decision and 90% is crossover tuning. And in most cases the first ideas was not the best. So dont't care too much about the design and spend more effort into the implementation.
I had the same question with my combination 22W / 12MU / D3004 and actually I have the crossover at 600Hz / 3kHz with a great result. I planned to try a lower 300/3000 but didn't realised it up to now because its so fine actually...

My finings to midrange domes (Thiel/Accuton C44): There can be achived a very good result, but if you are even a little bit off in the tuning its quite terrible. In comparison the 12MU was very tame.

Regards, Jean-Claude
Hi thanks a lot for your kind and valuable advice. 90% is a lot indeed. Maybe too much ? For instance i think that drivers selection is very important as well
You can have the best xover of the world but if the drivers are bad the sound will be bad Imho the best reviewed speakers had all extremely good drivers
Like the ATC's dome, the Heil's tweeter, the Apogee's ribbons, etc. In the end the drivers make the sound
 
Boy, people try to help you, but you are resisting very well.

You don't like problems that have no simple answer, you show that in every post.
In deed the x-over is not 90% of a multi way speaker, it is 100%, as without it there is no quality speaker worth to listen to.
One can do a 3-way x-over in about 45 seconds, only looking at the drivers and picking some caps from a box of old parts. No electronic part needed for the woofer, a capacitor for the mid, a smaller one for the tweeter and you are done. This prevents the speakers to be destroyed in the first seconds playing music.
You find such x-over "constructions" in many car audio speakers and even so called "HIFI" boxes that are wonderfully cheap.

As even you may realize, such a 90% construction has nothing to do with "High Fidelity". Even as such speakers may sound satisfying for many, when their brain/ ear has time to adjust to them and they carefully avoid listening to any reverence.
You can sure build a speaker of this kind from your salvaged parts if you learn basics about x-over parts.
 
Hi thanks a lot for your kind and valuable advice. 90% is a lot indeed. Maybe too much ? For instance i think that drivers selection is very important as well
You can have the best xover of the world but if the drivers are bad the sound will be bad Imho the best reviewed speakers had all extremely good drivers
Like the ATC's dome, the Heil's tweeter, the Apogee's ribbons, etc. In the end the drivers make the sound
you don't know what you don't know. you can't learn on paper what you'll like in person.
 
  • Like
Reactions: youknowyou
Thanks a lot ! i swear i will look at these site but it will take me some time ... 🙂
As a first impression these speakers ask for space ... that unfortunately i do not have 😢
For sure they are beautiful indeed Great speakers ... in any sense
That is just a small sample, there are many others...like Legacy Audio, Oido, Ecobox A priori, Lampizator, Ronald Wanders, and lets not forget diy Manzanita.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ginetto61
When you look at it from a commercial point of view, every person has a rear end, and there's a seat for every a$$, making everyone a customer for something.

Plenty of people are happy with the LS3/5 as a suitable speaker for their needs. I'm not one of them, as I don't consider this a full bandwidth solution. For me, satisfying bass needs to go down to at least the mid 30s, preferably mid 20s, but as our brains can reconstruct the missing low end based on the higher harmonics, smaller speakers are capable of conveying alot of typical music this way being that an electric string bass has louder 2nd harmonics than the fundamental tones. That.makes a speaker which only goes down to 82 hz capable of conveying a 41 hz low E on a 4 string bass.

You definitely need at least an 8 inch driver to reproduce sub frequencies at a satisfying level. A single 6 inch won't cut it and will be woefully inefficient if its a long stroke design, making power compression a real issue, especially in a relatively small sealed box. A transmission line with an 8 inch driver can sound good if dampened properly. I've heard a few designs like this which gave me a good representation of low end, even with pipe organ music and higher dynamic range classical. For something like EDM you'll need way more low end output capability for satisfying results (at least for my tastes).

Classical pieces like Stravinsky's Rite of Spring really need lots of cone surface area just to authoritively convey the lower midrange bandwidth of the percussion, strings and brass, let alone the full low end demanded by the bass drums in this piece. A small bookshelf 2 way speaker will be miserably disappointing when tasked to reproduce this material.
thanks a lot for the very useful advice
you say 8"
i was listening from a small speaker and i understood what i was missing after listening to a more full range 3 way
mini speakers need a sub indeed to provide a complete reproduction
 
Boy, people try to help you, but you are resisting very well.

You don't like problems that have no simple answer, you show that in every post.
In deed the x-over is not 90% of a multi way speaker, it is 100%, as without it there is no quality speaker worth to listen to.
One can do a 3-way x-over in about 45 seconds, only looking at the drivers and picking some caps from a box of old parts. No electronic part needed for the woofer, a capacitor for the mid, a smaller one for the tweeter and you are done. This prevents the speakers to be destroyed in the first seconds playing music.
You find such x-over "constructions" in many car audio speakers and even so called "HIFI" boxes that are wonderfully cheap.

As even you may realize, such a 90% construction has nothing to do with "High Fidelity". Even as such speakers may sound satisfying for many, when their brain/ ear has time to adjust to them and they carefully avoid listening to any reverence.
You can sure build a speaker of this kind from your salvaged parts if you learn basics about x-over parts.
thanks but just a simple question
if you had to design and build a 3 way where would you start then ? my guess is from the drivers selection. Am i wrong?
and then the xover of course
i was just asking if there is any reason to prefer domes to cones for the midrange driver and now i know that both could be fine
the only thing I really want is the woofer in a separate box
why satellite plus sub are so unpopular i don't understand really
 
which 3 way speaker are you talking about? is it documented somewhere?
Yes, the XSD described here and here.

1669841611355.jpeg

1669841629874.png