Most people don't realize that designing an active crossover (analogue or digital doesn't matter), involves more or less the same approach as designing a passive crossover: measurement.
Without that you need to make assumptions (for example where the sound originates in every driver), and you can get only in the ballpark. IMHO a simulation is essential in deciding if a design can be successful or not, but shouldn't be the only tool to make the design.
Ralf
Without that you need to make assumptions (for example where the sound originates in every driver), and you can get only in the ballpark. IMHO a simulation is essential in deciding if a design can be successful or not, but shouldn't be the only tool to make the design.
Ralf
Here is famous example about 3 way active crossover
https://www.eeweb.com/electronic-crossover-with-3-way-output/
At the end of each filter he put a 10k trimmer for adjustment .
I tried to simulate the trimmer as a pot and it very very impedance dependable
Each test I put one ground to the 8 ohm resistor where I would like to test .
for more detail down load the project , am I doing something wrong ?
https://www.eeweb.com/electronic-crossover-with-3-way-output/
At the end of each filter he put a 10k trimmer for adjustment .
I tried to simulate the trimmer as a pot and it very very impedance dependable
Each test I put one ground to the 8 ohm resistor where I would like to test .
for more detail down load the project , am I doing something wrong ?
Attachments
Could you please explain how I take the impedance drive at each point ?.Ok, will this be an analogue active design?
If you can measure and find where the driver is at, then compare it to where you want it to be then you can find the difference and make your circuit do this.
I could see with XSIM just need to know what configuration I has to do .
And how to calculate it with the XO in LTSPICE .
What is the problem?I tried to simulate the trimmer as a pot and it very very impedance dependable
Right I forgot we connect the active XO to the amplifier not direct to the driver
The input impedance of the amplifier is probably about ~100k
So the trimmer simulation should look like that and to put the ground where we want the adjustment .
The input impedance of the amplifier is probably about ~100k
So the trimmer simulation should look like that and to put the ground where we want the adjustment .
Attachments
Last edited:
Actualy the XO is fine no need to change something there .
off course the drivers isn't equal with there phase .
Here is picture of the drivers phase without any filters
The cut off FR of the active XO is 400HZ and 3KHZ .
At this points the difference , in the phase between bass mid is ~ +30... +60 degree toward the woofer .
Mid-tweeter about a +120 toward the mid .
If I get it right , to do the adjustment we have to minus woofer phase or to add midrange phase , in the XO , same trick to mid \tweeter ?
off course the drivers isn't equal with there phase .
Here is picture of the drivers phase without any filters
The cut off FR of the active XO is 400HZ and 3KHZ .
At this points the difference , in the phase between bass mid is ~ +30... +60 degree toward the woofer .
Mid-tweeter about a +120 toward the mid .
If I get it right , to do the adjustment we have to minus woofer phase or to add midrange phase , in the XO , same trick to mid \tweeter ?
Attachments
Last edited:
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Multi-Way
- 3 way crossover design advices