DAC AD1862: Almost THT, I2S input, NOS, R-2R

diyAudio_SPDIF-I2S_Schematic.jpg



Is it a worthwhile venture or has anyone tried headers for the I2S connections? I'm thinking of the ones Vunce mentioned in post #4022.

Regards,
Dan
 
Hello Miro,

I never posted here but I have built the AD1862 DAC based on your design and it works well.

Initially, I built it with output opamp stage on board and started of with LM6171 before upgrading to SS3601. Input board is JLsounds USB module, the first version. Power supplies include Salas Ultrabib for +/-5V and +/-12V for AD1862 and AMB sigma 11 and another supply for two independent 5V supplies for USB boards. I listened in this configuration for few years and was very happy with sound.

As part of upgrade, I have recently moved to new iteration of JLsounds USB module along with independent crystals. For the output stage, I have moved to FC CEN IV stage designed by EUVL and supported by Fran. I am letting in burn in as of now and will check it in my main system later on.

Thank you for your wonderful design and introducing us to AD1862 DAC.

Thanks
Balaji
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20240813_084418.jpg
    IMG_20240813_084418.jpg
    499.4 KB · Views: 114
Thanks for sharing your build, I too am curious about your cen IV impression.

I have a somewhat similar setup, except for using the PCM63 board/IC. I recently went from the SS3601 to Burson V7v which, in my system and to my ears, offers a significant upgrade in terms of resolution and transparency. @Brijac gets credit for encouraging this upgrade 🙂

I use two Miro's PS2 for the DAC board and opamps (digital/analog separate). I recently borrowed a Salas uBib from another DAC to try it with the SS3601 and was quite surprised that it made the bass muddy and reduced the overall transparency (again, in my system and to my ears...). I upped the bias current and tried replacing the green Muses with Panasonic FRs, which helped, but went back to the Miro PS2. Just thought I would share this observation as it was unexpected given the great feedback the uBib gets. Maybe the Jung/Didden superreg will be next for the opamps, or the PSU2 mini with one for each channel.

Cheers,
Soren
 
From all discrete regulators I ever tested in simulation, the best so far seems be the one from Pioneer PD-93. Very stable output under switching load, very stable output with dirty input ... everything a good DAC PSU should have 😊
 

Attachments

  • Pioneer_PD-93_PSU_Transistors.jpg
    Pioneer_PD-93_PSU_Transistors.jpg
    85 KB · Views: 149
  • Pioneer_PD-93_PSU_Transistors_Sim1.jpg
    Pioneer_PD-93_PSU_Transistors_Sim1.jpg
    62.6 KB · Views: 147
  • Pioneer_PD-93_PSU_Transistors_Sim1_stable-output_detail.jpg
    Pioneer_PD-93_PSU_Transistors_Sim1_stable-output_detail.jpg
    75.1 KB · Views: 86
  • Pioneer_PD-93_PSU_Transistors_Sim1_Switching-Load.jpg
    Pioneer_PD-93_PSU_Transistors_Sim1_Switching-Load.jpg
    109.4 KB · Views: 89
  • Pioneer_PD-93_PSU_Transistors_Sim1_unstable-input_stable-output.jpg
    Pioneer_PD-93_PSU_Transistors_Sim1_unstable-input_stable-output.jpg
    89.5 KB · Views: 146
I don't have the skills/knowledge to appreciate the technical differences between the PD93 and Jung/Didden regulators, but would be curious how they would compare to Miro's PS2, in simulation or measurement. I guess an answer still wouldn't eliminate the need/urge to build and compare...
 
From all discrete regulators I ever tested in simulation, the best so far seems be the one from Pioneer PD-93. Very stable output under switching load, very stable output with dirty input ... everything a good DAC PSU should have 😊
Don't forget that the final result depends as much on layout and implementation as simulation.
Did those you tested have remote sensing? If not, they will fall behind the Jung/Didden in practical use.

Look at these graphs: https://linearaudio.net/color-graphs-jack-waltons-regulator-article-vol-4

Jan
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sorenm and miro1360