• WARNING: Tube/Valve amplifiers use potentially LETHAL HIGH VOLTAGES.
    Building, troubleshooting and testing of these amplifiers should only be
    performed by someone who is thoroughly familiar with
    the safety precautions around high voltages.

HiFi phase splitter - "best" design option?

The swing problem is not resolved even using 500V supply . A cathodyne can't give you 200Vpp swing , or more , for 6AS7 cathode biased .
And of course you can't push it to the max with high distortion , or what is this , a contest for stinginess ?
 
Last edited:
One thing to remember is that for a cathodyne to supply ~200Vpp the first stage needs to supply 200Vpp.
This is the typical setup used by @kodabmx in his triode-strapped TV tubes amps:
1704983032907.png
You can get there, but you need a ton of voltage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: banat
To be honest I still believe the LTP is the best option here. Are there other options? Sure, but the LTP is the simplest one, imho.
Same.

I love the cathodyne and prefer it in every instance where I can use it- but this is not the place for it. Unless you go for a Williamson front end and follow up with higher voltage gain stages it doesn't make sense to use it here. 90% of my amps have used the cathodyne- and of the dozen or so finished push-pull amps on hand that I held onto- all use a cathodyne.

Personally, if this were my project that for whatever reason I was required to make happen- I would grab a filament transformer- run it backwards off of the filament supply, and stack that on the plate supply for the differential and front end. Another ~120-150 volts rectified of headroom will make a huge difference here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jcalvarez
Sorry not replied sooner, my PC died.
could create a negative supply from?
Think so, having trouble visualising that. A lot of amps use a tap off the secondary to power a bias supply, see - http://www.valvewizard.co.uk/bias.html I prefer a separate tfmr & bridge rectified supply, mainly because the negative V supply is ripple free & I get more Vout.

Re the CCS, I use the attached. I prefer using a MJE340 or BD139 with or without another transistor. The extra tranny gives a higher impedance but there's not much in it. I use Piher 500r presets with a fixed R for the emitter R and use 6V2 zeners. A 6V2 zener gives more adjustment than a LED. With a 6V2 zener Er is found by dividing 5.4 by what Ik you want. Remember for an LTP thats Ik x 2.

Hope that helps, Andy.
 

Attachments

  • MJE340 BC549 CCS.jpeg
    MJE340 BC549 CCS.jpeg
    73.4 KB · Views: 99
  • MJE340 CCS.jpeg
    MJE340 CCS.jpeg
    62.2 KB · Views: 97
  • Like
Reactions: jcalvarez
Not falling into the main body of the thread, but true to the thread title, sometimes the "best" design option is to accept that a mu of 2, not very linear, output valve is just not a good design choice. Engineering is evolution, mostly by death of the not-fit-est. Good information lives to procreate, both as continuing designs and as cautionary tales.

All good fortune,
Chris
 
  • Like
Reactions: gorgon53
Another option with split-load/cathodyne/concertina is placed it in the front as the input, acting like a 1:2 input transformer and not inside the feedback loop, and cap coupled the PP signal to your favorite PP or differential/LTP driver circuit.

My allegiance to split-load/cathodyne/concertina is that each of the two phases of PP goes through the same number of active devices. Unreasonable? Maybe...
 
  • Like
Reactions: mashaffer
I'm going to breadboard a power supply and one channel so I can play around with various configurations.

The power stage will remain fixed as 6AS7, however I might have to change to bias resistors if the B+ voltage varied a lot. I have octal relay bases which are superb for breadboarding (see attached). There's not a noval valve base relay socket unfortunately, however I'll sort something out.

Breadboarding will allow me to easily change components and configuration of the phase splitter/inverter type. I will buy some DC voltage display meters to wire in so I can easily take notes of the circuit voltage levels.

I've got a digital scope knocking around somewhere so maybe time to dig that out or possibly invest in something newer...

Oh, I've taken delivery of a number of ECF82 valves NOS so I will experiment and compare in LTP with CCS against 6N1P, with CCS. And a measure of negative bias as well.
 

Attachments