Rawson Repair Reflections

Member
Joined 2004
Paid Member
Each one of these are so fascinating and oddly satisfying to see them fixed. What's different on this one is that the RED/BLACK from the PSU are actually V+/- rails and the GND is passing through (lifted) 3R 3W resistors via grey wire. I bet this thing suffered from some pretty bad hum, even worse than what you might be experiencing currently. Just make sure you double and triple check your connections when you replace the PSU board.

I just also noticed the resistor across the input rcas. If these are 'true' aleph boards, see if there is an input- on the board. If there is, it should be jumpered to input GND.

Why do you still have hum? I'm sure the power wiring is contributing to a degree but probably not the only cause. If you get the PSU board out, I'm sure everyone would like to see the bottom. The creator had a habit of scratching together PSUs from self etched copperclad boards.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Member
Joined 2004
Paid Member
Update - when I actually LOOKED at the IEC it does have a fuseholder! So at least that was there. But I'm in agreement that the rebuild is necessary, and I'm looking forward to it.
 

Attachments

  • F3E20B9E-3F7C-4FFA-9C1D-897702392552.jpeg
    F3E20B9E-3F7C-4FFA-9C1D-897702392552.jpeg
    517.2 KB · Views: 46
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Hello, I’m relatively new to DIY audio though I have lurked on various forums for years. In any case, I recently acquired a Rawson built Aleph J and upon trying to reach out to Randy via a PM discovered I’m under moderation.

Randy, assuming you see this, could you “start a PM conversation“ with me so I may share some info with you in hopes to determine reasonable next steps regarding this amp.

Thanks much for any consideration.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Member
Joined 2010
Paid Member
Hello, I’m relatively new to DIY audio though I have lurked on various forums for years. In any case, I recently acquired a Rawson built Aleph J and upon trying to reach out to Randy via a PM discovered I’m under moderation.

Randy, assuming you see this, could you “start a PM conversation“ with me so I may share some info with you in hopes to determine reasonable next steps regarding this amp.

Thanks much for any consideration.

IMHO, by default, we get moderated when we purchase a Rawson amp.

Randy seems to be the main exorcist around here. :devilish:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
You need 200 watts.
Your funny....I'm currently driving LRS Magnepans with the little ACA "Mini" amp! And they are filling a 12 X 24 X 8 living room....Three biggest lies in history...I'll love you in the morning, The checks in the mail, My Volvo is a great car and Magnepans need lots of power! (But they do need current!)
 

Attachments

  • P1060134.JPG
    P1060134.JPG
    267.7 KB · Views: 30
Member
Joined 2010
Paid Member
Funny? Nope, just realistic... been there, done that as a matter of fact.

I've tried running the 1.7s with the SissySIT and the Mini myself.

It has NO right to sound as good as it does. BUT, it won't play loud and the bass lacks punch. I mean it sounds fantastic, within it's peak dynamic range. You can get used to it, I listened to it for two whole days, amazed, plain amazed. But then... I hooked it up to the A2s and reality hit me right on the forehead.

When I tried running the Mini last year it sounded very good, really good, but again, ran out of steam too soon.

In my book, the A2s do it for me... glorious 2nd order distortion and deep down bass drive. And, I'm not taking about Euro Techno or anything crazy like that... just normal acoustic dynamics.

I'm punching for a 100wpc SIT. That might do it. Or perhaps an F5T v3.
 
Last edited:
Adding another one to the list- an F3.

Notes when opening it up-

-No signal on the right channel.
-No CL-60 but a strange resistor set up to lower input voltage?
-No grounding, of course.
-54v from the power supply seems a bit too high.

The plastic spacers for the right channel RCA jack were either missing or melted and the input shorted. I replaced the jack, mounted it correctly and both channels worked.

I noticed that the back panel holding the resistor bundle got really hot, almost immediately. That bundle is right next to the right RCA jack. Hmm...that does not inspire confidence in playing the amp as it is. It looks like I'm off to the parts bin for a rummage and a call to rthatcher for advice and some new parts.

Next steps:

  • Replace the power supply board with a new board, 63V caps, CL-60's and proper grounding.
  • Replace the doughnut with an 36V one, giving me 43V at the amplifier boards.
  • Remove the resistor bundle on the back panel.
The update took a bit longer than expected but I'm now enjoying Papa's F3. The right channel was fine once I made the updates and resoldered all the connections. The amp gets warm and now runs like a First Watt amplifier as opposed to burning your fingers, if you touched it.

I removed the resistor set up attached to the back panel, which had turned the amp into a toaster.
Bought a new transformer with the correct voltage.
Added a power supply board from Rthatcher, made to fit a small chassis. (The key to making this all work)
Added a star ground.
Replaced the cheesy speaker terminals.
Keratherm pads underneath all the Fets.
And plenty of CL-60s on the small board connecting the 120V in and also on the power supply board.

A big Thank You to Papa and Randy!
 

Attachments

  • IMG-6538.jpg
    IMG-6538.jpg
    584.5 KB · Views: 54
  • IMG-6539.jpg
    IMG-6539.jpg
    574.4 KB · Views: 51
  • IMG-6540.jpg
    IMG-6540.jpg
    558.2 KB · Views: 50
  • IMG-6541.jpg
    IMG-6541.jpg
    558.6 KB · Views: 49
  • IMG-6542.jpg
    IMG-6542.jpg
    545.7 KB · Views: 52
  • Like
  • Thank You
Reactions: 2 users
Member
Joined 2010
Paid Member
Re: F5M.... as I recall, Nelson introduced it as a "cheaper" alternative to the F5. He said that FYI'rs want it cheap and so he took out some parts that lowered the cost.

So, I read that as an effort to make a cheaper F5.

I don't recall any claims that it would sound better. It could be implied that less parts are better, but still... IMHO less parts.. easier to build, etc... yes, but how many parts are the minimum to make something sound good?