Best Compression Drivers today 2022?

Do you know of any modern, say below $500, that comes close?

Well, it depends on how you define "close".

If bought new, these are approx $1,500 (driver) + $500 (diaphragm) + $4,000 (horn) each, so $ 12,000 total for the pair.

$500 (I presume each, and for driver+horn) would be $ 1,000 total, i.e. over a factor of 10x cheaper.

Clearly, the law of diminishing returns always applies. I'm not suggesting for a minute that any such alternative would be 10 times worse in any objective measurable way.

I also agree with Dr. Geddes that good system and crossover design is more important than the compression driver used (but not to the point of making all drivers equal and fully interchangeable).

Having said all of the above, I'm afraid I don't have a straight answer to your question.
What I can say, is that I do not think that any $500 combo would ever be "just as good".
Then, whether it would be "good enough" for you... will depend on how easily pleased (or otherwise) you are!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ra7 and Jonasz
Must say I do like my cheapskate system, faar from the ultimate but probably on par with many quite expensive commercial systems. Battered Altec VOT cabs with 515s, and either Altec 1505b with 299-8a with original alu or paper diaphrams or SEOS 30 with Celestion axi2050. Subwoofers are JBL 2242H ( one yet, number to in progress) all bought used and cheap or exchanged with other audio stuff. I use autoformer 6db filters or active with miniDSP flex 8. Amps are a selection of DIY tube, class A and D. Regrettably the SEOS axi combo sounds better than the beutiful multicells.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IamJF
I'll give you three current products that would qualify as "cream of the crop" out of the box:
TAD TD-2002 (1" throat)
TAD TD-4001 (2" throat)
GT SOUND GSU-D04R (2" throat)

Horns:
Yamamoto SS-500 (1" throat)
Yamamoto SS-300 (2" throat)

I'll let others summarise on the "reasonably priced" options (none of which I can guarantee will be as good as the above).
What's your opinion about horns from Joseph Crowe?
The biradial horns seem a bit similar to the Yamanoto horn.
Time domain behavior on Joseph's horn is really good (with good driver) so does the multi-tone measurement.
 
I'll give you three current products that would qualify as "cream of the crop" out of the box:
TAD TD-2002 (1" throat)
TAD TD-4001 (2" throat)
GT SOUND GSU-D04R (2" throat)
I've been doing some research and finding that TAD products are generally ridiculously expensive, similar to some boutique capacitors with exorbitant cost and dubious performance advantages. See this for example:
1684954786570.png


There is no demonstrable advantage that they are providing to justify the higher costs, and seems like their drivers are the same as 30 years ago. TAD had a reputation for top quality engineering and products but looks like development of CDs stopped many years ago. This is my opinion and I'm sure the folks at TAD are doing their best.

I have personally heard the TAD 2001 on a tractrix horn and besides the obvious last octave advantage, there was not much difference in sound compared to two inch drivers with Be diaphragms. In fact, side by side comparison showed more dynamic ease at the lower end compared to the TAD 2001. My other TAD experience was with their Reference One loudspeaker at a show. It sounded okay on simple vocals songs, but as soon as I asked them to play a symphonic piece (the famous RR recording of Rachmaninov's symphonic dances) it fell apart badly. I'm sure TAD 2001 is kind of up there with the best, but it misses the point of this thread. Technology has evolved, and compression driver design has evolved too. To me at least, it is exciting to figure out what folks are doing to push performance in new designs (improved motors, phase plugs, diaphragm materials, voice coil design, and coupling to horns).

(Marco, I am looking for evidence, I promise. It's slow going with all the other things in life.)
 
TAD had a reputation for top quality engineering and products but looks like development of CDs stopped many years ago.

True, it did.

I have personally heard the TAD 2001 on a tractrix horn and besides the obvious last octave advantage, there was not much difference in sound compared to two inch drivers with Be diaphragms. In fact, side by side comparison showed more dynamic ease at the lower end compared to the TAD 2001.

To be expected. A larger diaphragm will always be more at ease at lower frequencies, because of lower excursion.

My other TAD experience was with their Reference One loudspeaker at a show. It sounded okay on simple vocals songs, but as soon as I asked them to play a symphonic piece (the famous RR recording of Rachmaninov's symphonic dances) it fell apart badly.

Those have nothing, zero, in common with the older TAD units (apart from a logo).
Not the same design team either.

I'm sure TAD 2001 is kind of up there with the best, but it misses the point of this thread.

Fair enough.

Technology has evolved, and compression driver design has evolved too. To me at least, it is exciting to figure out what folks are doing to push performance in new designs (improved motors, phase plugs, diaphragm materials, voice coil design, and coupling to horns).

This is where we disagree perhaps. I see most of the "evolution" after the time when the TAD drivers were designed (1980s for the original 4001 and 2001, and then 1990s for the improved 4003 and 2002) as having been directed at trying to approach the same level of performance while cutting costs as much as possible. A worthy goal in its own right, for sure, but it does not mean that any actual improvements have been made in terms of absolute performance.
Quite the contrary, in fact. Those TADs are still unsurpassed.
 
Thanks for the above and I appreciate your nuanced opinion. I wish the performance advantages were obvious though. Top end extension and smoothness throughout seems to be clear—the latter being very important—but I am not finding comparative distortion measurements to say for sure. Also, the 2001 seems to be better above 800 hz and may be improved upon when mating to a 15” woofer using drivers that go just a bit lower.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marco_gea
I see most of the "evolution" after the time when the TAD drivers were designed ... as having been directed at trying to approach the same level of performance while cutting costs as much as possible. A worthy goal in its own right, for sure, but it does not mean that any actual improvements have been made in terms of absolute performance.
True enough and admirable IMO, and also successful, what's not to like.
Quite the contrary, in fact. Those TADs are still unsurpassed.
Unsurpassed?! Maybe. Equaled, absolutely.
 
I think they're very good, and another very good option.
The CNC shop in China is carzy affordable. I've contact one store and he said he'd made the horn before and he also shows the product picture to me.
Maybe I'll order one someday...
Major concern would be the wood selection. Is there suggested wood type or the type one should avoid?
Picture below is the product from seller.
1684958356843.png
 
I also agree with Dr. Geddes that good system and crossover design is more important than the compression driver used (but not to the point of making all drivers equal and fully interchangeable).
That is not what I am saying.

Once a companies engineering expertise and quality control reaches the highest levels, the differences in sound quality are insignificant.

This is not true of all manufacturers, PAudio comes to mind and many others. I've tried dozens of drivers and only ones at the top work for me, but there are several at the top and price is not a factor.