The Weather

The power grab "who" was exactly what I thought. It's an old friend who thinks this, he was quite unpleasent about it. As luck would have it he didn't seem to want to say who the "who" might be. I didn't want to go down that road.

Thank you for the answers. One graph I saw said 1 foot in sea level since 1900. That didn't seem right. The friend says that the Thames Barrier only gets used because the people working there must prove it's value. 90% of me says not true. 10% says he might be right.

Your friend could be right. Then again, the near unanimity of the science world could also be right...
 
My friend set me thinking. I suspect the Dutch have the most knowledge. I would place my trust in it more than any other source. I said the only plot might be to take money power away from oil producers. If so why now and not the past? I can see a time when London floods and Amsterdam not because the Dutch acted quickly enough. My friends words " The sea hasn't changed in 60 years. It's a pack of lies. I know what I see with my own eyes ". More or less what he said. I have known him nearly 50 years. This is the first time I had to disagree with him to the extent that feelings were hurt.
 
Britain has very good records of floods going back hundreds of years.....

"Number of floods" is a dubious metric. New Jersey had dozens of 100-year floods 1960-2000 because we were bulldozing and paving watersheds relentlessly. Bound Brook hadn't flooded twice in 3 centuries until Rt22 and the uplands were developed and forced to drain to the river instead of soaking the ground, then it got knee-high 3 times in 2 decades. (Which was about the last stroke for a town devastated by a chemical industry collapse.) Then again in 2007.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipe...ndbrook041607.jpg/1280px-Boundbrook041607.jpg
 
My friend set me thinking...snip... The sea hasn't changed in 60 years. It's a pack of lies. I know what I see with my own eyes ". More or less what he said. I have known him nearly 50 years. This is the first time I had to disagree with him to the extent that feelings were hurt.

So your friend doesn't believe in anything he can't see? He also doesn't believe in COVID (a virus MUCH too small to see)? Or any number of other phenomena? I'm sorry this caused hurt feelings. That sucks...

"Number of floods" is a dubious metric. New Jersey had dozens of 100-year floods 1960-2000 because we were bulldozing and paving watersheds relentlessly. Bound Brook hadn't flooded twice in 3 centuries until Rt22 and the uplands were developed and forced to drain to the river instead of soaking the ground, then it got knee-high 3 times in 2 decades. (Which was about the last stroke for a town devastated by a chemical industry collapse.) Then again in 2007.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipe...ndbrook041607.jpg/1280px-Boundbrook041607.jpg

Exactly!
 
I've recently read a very interesting book: "The unnatural nature of science". The author argues that science and the scientific method are unnatural, because it involves NOT believing what you see or hear, but instead rely on reason, repeatable experiments and math. And, most important and most difficult for us, a willingness to accept that you were wrong and made a mistake. A really good scientist is constantly trying to prove himself wrong!

There's not much more unnatural for the human species.
So it is no surprise that not all humans are comfortable with such a mindset and have trouble to believe that what they can't see or even what goes against what they clearly see!

Again, the solution is threefold: education, education, education.

Jan
 
My point was. The Dutch know more than us. They live very near us. I bet we ignore what they are doing. And yes to we build where we shouldn't.

I have said many times that the train Greta Thunberg believes in left the station maybe in 2000. It might have arrived at it's final station already. It is right to agree with her, but for different reasons. Reduction, not cure. The rest is engineering.

It is possible the train was in the station as long ago as 1850.
 
Taking an average of what's said this is typical. I can understand my friend thinking it's not true.

"Global mean sea level has risen about 8–9 inches (21–24 centimeters) since 1880, with about a third of that coming in just the last two and a half decades. The rising water level is mostly due to a combination of meltwater from glaciers and ice sheets and thermal expansion of seawater as it warms"

Climate Change: Global Sea Level | NOAA Climate.gov
 
What power could exactly be grabbed by saying that the sea level rises if it doesn't? Is it a plot of the dike-builders association? Have they bribed the entire science community all over the world?

Jan

You know, could be you're on to something there! 😀
Maybe the Masonic Lodge is trying to get the dike builders to use more stone and concrete. 😀

It's like summer is ending here, I have to think of something to save my chilies so they can mature. Especially my Trinidad Moruga Scorpion...
 
Here in the U.K. the last week or so has seen heavy rain ‘showers’.

All the water soaks back through the render and block work.

62B6BEB0-72D1-41FB-9545-9E48EC2EF895.jpg