CFH7 Amp

Originally Posted by zoky2 View Post
apexaudio,

I replaced 6k8 resistor with 12k and still no change . Something other must be wrong
Regards

zoky2
XRKaudio wrote:

Did you ever resolve the lack of bias issue?

Yes, I was resolve bias issue,but I can t remember how exactly I do this.
It was something with 100k trimers T1 and T3 and some voltage across them.
Sorry ,I can t remember anything else.

Regards
zoky2
 
Founder of XSA-Labs
Joined 2012
Paid Member
Sorry I developed this back when I was using Tina. I have since switched to LTSpice but never made this one. It’s easy enough to make from the schematics. All common parts.

563077d1470254072-cfh7-amp-cfh7-sch-v1.1.png
 
yes i tried these changes.
FFT looks a bit weird but this is a FFT-setup problem i think.

I added cap multiplier ( power supply )
and want to see hat happens and what is the difference

and use a cap multiplier instead of diode + 10Ohm

i will understand the functionality of current feedback amplifiers ...
 
Founder of XSA-Labs
Joined 2012
Paid Member
Hi Saddevil,

I took your LTSpice file and modified the FFT analysis part to use V(out) label. Changed the gate snubbers from 22 ohm to 220ohm. Otherwise the schematic is the same.

It runs fine and a nice performance: at 72Wrms (68Vpp) into 8ohms has
predicted 0.00123% THD and nice harmonic profile. Dominant third order and
descending higher orders. This will only be true if parts are matched but in reality, MOSFETs and other parts are not matched above and below so THD will be a bit higher and distortion profile may end up being dominant 2nd order (a good thing).

Here is predicted FFT:
attachment.php


Revised .ASC file attached.
 

Attachments

  • CFH9-Cx-FFT-72Wrms-8ohms.jpg
    CFH9-Cx-FFT-72Wrms-8ohms.jpg
    207.3 KB · Views: 569
  • CFH9-Cx-xrk971.asc
    15.1 KB · Views: 74
Last edited: