Salas SSLV1.3 UltraBiB shunt regulator

I tested Q1, and found a short between Base and Emitter. To late at night now, not easy to dissasemble. Tomorrow I will replace. THANKS SALAS:)
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20181101_224917.jpg
    IMG_20181101_224917.jpg
    847.2 KB · Views: 545
diyAudio Chief Moderator
Joined 2002
Paid Member
P.S. When you will replace Q1 also check mV drop from leg to leg on R4. If its running something normal like 2mA that will make 540mV. There is range in mV reading due to J1's various IDSS but not order of magnitude range. So to know J1 is not the fault's root problem for draining high current through that kills Q1.
 
Hi Salas,
I am assembling parts for a pair of UltraBibs, and I hope that you can give me your view on whether FQP13N10/12P10 would be acceptable alternatives for IRF530/9530 at the M2 position?
They appear to have similar performance characteristics, e.g. Rds-on pretty close, the FQP's have a little lower available continuous drain current and perhaps are not quite as thermally robust, FQP's appear to have lower dynamic capacitance.
Which characteristics are important at M2?

Thanks,
Keith
 
diyAudio Chief Moderator
Joined 2002
Paid Member
In simulation (with ON Semi published Spice model) the FQP13N10 looks precarious to oscillate as the system loses 20deg phase margin vs using the IRF530. It may prove otherwise in practice if you have the time to test it. Having lower dynamic capacitance is nice but that's straightforward only for M1. M2 has to fit best the rest of this circuit's parameters. The IRF630 looks good for M2 as well.
 
Salas, thanks very much, I appreciate your patience. In my naivete' I imagined this might be answerable my inspection.

In simulation (with ON Semi published Spice model) the FQP13N10 looks precarious to oscillate as the system loses 20deg phase margin vs using the IRF530.
Yikes. This sounds less than optimum. I will need to learn how to use SPICE.

It may prove otherwise in practice if you have the time to test it.
I don't think I know how to test this, but I will do a search for "how to test phase margin" should I try the 13N10 in this circuit.

M2 has to fit best the rest of this circuit's parameters. The IRF630 looks good for M2 as well.
It seems prudent to stick with the published values, but I'll have a peek at the IRF630 too.

Thanks again,
Keith