Building a Pearl 2

Snubber network is different for each type of transformers, there is no universal value. Mark Johnson showed how to select the right one with his jigs and oscilloscope. Very simple to build in dead bug form with copper surface as gnd.In fact, it is CRC snubber.
 
True! And with the proper tools it's easy. Without the proper tools, the 0.22uF is better than nothing.
DIY builder who are ready to pay high amount of money for cartridges and tonearms, and even cables , and build high grade phono stages should have oscilloscope which are no longer so expensive in USB form.I is only half the price of decent entry level phono cartridge.
 
True! And with the proper tools it's easy. Without the proper tools, the 0.22uF is better than nothing.

If you are using a torroid, the leakage inductance is probably in the tens of microHenries. If you're using an EI transformer the leakage inductance will be in the milliHenries.

Christophe Basso is your go-to-guy and you would probably find this paper he wrote for APEC illuminating: http://cbasso.pagesperso-orange.fr/Downloads/PPTs/Chris Basso APEC seminar 2011.pdf

Just looked at my Pearl 2 power supply -- no snubber and no ringing -- using an Amveco trafo and bridge rectifier.

On the other hand, real world issues on an EI core trafo -- this traf was salvaged from an HP 465 amplifier:
 

Attachments

  • nosnubber2.gif
    nosnubber2.gif
    16.9 KB · Views: 594


Moved here from elsewhere ...

15va transformers (one per rail) to MBR20200 rectifiers feeding 10,000uf 63v T-Net (4 pole) caps raw to super teddy regs...I had all/most the bits knocking about and just sorting out the layout with the existing case I have.

Luckily it looks like it all fits OK..
 
IF you have an extra case I'd strongly suggest placing the raw PSU in it by itself. Both my Pearl and Pearl 2 were only really quiet when the transformers were 3 feet from the board.

That said, I'm really looking forward to seeing how the Teddyregs work out in your build! They are neat bits of kit and I've always wanted to try them.
 
Moved here from elsewhere ...

15va transformers (one per rail) to MBR20200 rectifiers feeding 10,000uf 63v T-Net (4 pole) caps raw to super teddy regs...I had all/most the bits knocking about and just sorting out the layout with the existing case I have.

You would be better off with LM317/LM337 with the adjust pin bypassed, even better with the Sjostrom or Jung. The Super Teddy Regs are very quiet, but very slow and they will put back on the power supply rails harmonics of the fundamental. They were among the worst regulators tested for the Linear Audio article. Here are some comparisons of the THD on supply rails. In order, Super Teddy, LM317, Sjostrom, Jung:
 

Attachments

  • SuperTed.gif
    SuperTed.gif
    26.7 KB · Views: 580
  • LM317_Thd.gif
    LM317_Thd.gif
    24.4 KB · Views: 518
  • Sjostrom.gif
    Sjostrom.gif
    59.7 KB · Views: 514
  • Jung.gif
    Jung.gif
    23 KB · Views: 492


So always willing to take advise...revised cases. One for the PSU one for the Pearl's..WTF they just fit..

Regs..Mmm, I use S-teddy regs in my existing phono amp with superb results over Jung/Weeks super regs or Russ white shunts but will now (first) load the board with 317 337 variants and give them a go. I can always just pop the teddies in to see at a later stage.
 
In my experience, R-cores hummmmmmm. I'd avoid them.

YMMV. If you've got the 22V toroid, might as well use it. Also fewer volts will be dissipated as heat in the regulators with the 22v.

I don't have as much experience as you, but at home every toroïd humm (and, as long as I remamber, I've always heard the toroïd in all my gears). I'm used to it (even if the noise of the one in my Aleph J is sometimes annoying).
I used Rcore for the first time in a dual mono psu for a Phonoclone. There was no noise coming from the box with the two 50VA Rcores.
Then, I read an interview of John Curl (link) where he says that, for small signal application, toroïd is not the best choice (see P9) so I choose a Rcore for my Pearl2.
 
Last edited:
I would like to try an R-core again and see how it works!

😀

I used Rcore for the first time in a dual mono psu for a Phonoclone. There was no noise coming from the box with the two 50VA Rcores.
Then, I read an interview of John Curl (link) where he says that, for small signal application, toroïd is not the best choice (see P9) so I choose a Rcore for my Pearl2.
 
You would be better off with LM317/LM337 with the adjust pin bypassed, even better with the Sjostrom or Jung. The Super Teddy Regs are very quiet, but very slow and they will put back on the power supply rails harmonics of the fundamental. They were among the worst regulators tested for the Linear Audio article. Here are some comparisons of the THD on supply rails. In order, Super Teddy, LM317, Sjostrom, Jung:

I understand your belief and one cant diss the tech but I use my ears over 'tech' to determine what 'sounds right/best' IMO the S-teddy reg is sonically superior in my system to others and I've had them / tried all over the years. Just to clarify I have the 4 transformer, 4 cap, 4 reg set up in my current phono front end which is the LT1115 - LT1010 buffer, as used in the Dynavector, mine is a DIY jobbie though.