Revisiting some "old" ideas from 1970's - IPS, OPS

Get a temperature controlled iron with replaceable tips.
I regularly use the smallest but the radius on the end is far too big. But it works.

I wish I could take a big tip and shape it to a chisel point, but I don't know how to iron plate it to cover up the reshaped copper.
I have a chisel point in my spares box, but it is not quite wide enough and the radius at the tip is too big. I want a real chisel POINT.

There are Youtube videos showing how to solder parts such as TQFP with a massive wedge tip. You lay fine solder(.015") across the pads and just quickly swipe the iron across the row. It actually work quite well if everything is clean enough.
 
I hope to ended up the war🙂
Yes this sot363 dual transistor is smaller to bc846 sot23
Yes it is difficult to solder by hand this sot363
You must solder all pins from the same side together😉
You must solder all pins from the other side together
Then either reflow each side(using flux) keeping the board vertical or use desoldering wire.
I use 0.5mm solder wire
 

Attachments

  • bc846.PNG
    bc846.PNG
    20.7 KB · Views: 383
  • 846npn pnp.PNG
    846npn pnp.PNG
    71.6 KB · Views: 386
Last edited:
it's the same size as the sot23.
It has extra pins.
It is the same height, it is not top heavy.
Because it has extra pins the pins are clsoer together.
Once the device is tacked by one corner pin, it becomes an easy job to solder the other three corner pins. Then properly solder the first pin. None of this is any more difficult than soldering a 3pin sot23.

The bigger problem is applying solder to the middle pin of each group of three.
Jw has described a method of "swiping" and then cleaning out any shorting between the very closely spaced pins.
I prefer to solder the close fitting pins individually. I have done it with a soic 8pin, but this is nearly double the spacing at 0.05".
 
They are not the same size. Sot363 2.2mm x 2.0mm x 1.1mm. Sot23. 3.0mm x 2.5mm x 1.1

Biggest issue is aligning very narrow pins on very close pads and holding the part still and aligned to get it soldered. Then clearing solder from between the close pads buried berween the narrowly spaced pins.
 
it's the same size as the sot23.
It has extra pins.
It is the same height, it is not top heavy.
Because it has extra pins the pins are clsoer together.
Once the device is tacked by one corner pin, it becomes an easy job to solder the other three corner pins. Then properly solder the first pin. None of this is any more difficult than soldering a 3pin sot23.

The bigger problem is applying solder to the middle pin of each group of three.
Jw has described a method of "swiping" and then cleaning out any shorting between the very closely spaced pins.
I prefer to solder the close fitting pins individually. I have done it with a soic 8pin, but this is nearly double the spacing at 0.05".

I'm not calling you a liar, but I am telling you they are a different size and they are top heavy
 

Attachments

  • 2016-08-26 09.53.48.jpg
    2016-08-26 09.53.48.jpg
    586.2 KB · Views: 356
Yes - we can have a matched (and thermally coupled) pair of npn+npn, pnp+pnp, or npn+pnp - whatever we need in particular case - suitable for virtually any kind of a front-end. Lots of freedom for designer.

But there must be some drawback. Difficult to solder manually 🙂 Even SMD opamps - like AD711 - are not that much of a problem as they are slightly bigger.

I'd love to have some more matched-dual or even -quad options available... some C3503/A1381 in a big 6-pin case would be great. As well as some sort of C1845/A992 and N5551/5401 pairs for higher-voltage application. Some jfet pairs would be great. K389 are not produced any more. Just dreaming 😉
BC846BPDW1T1G dual NPN-PNP. not reported on datta seat as matched devices😕
 
Last edited:
BC846BPDW1T1G dual NPN-PNP. not reported on datta seat as matched devices😕

Hi Thimios,

You are actually right. NPN-NPN and PNP-PNP duals are matched within the package. NPN-PNP ones are complementary, so they are never really matched. However, if you look at the curves in the datasheet, NPN and PNP ones are rather close to each other.

It would be interesting to compare h21 and Vbe measurements within NPN-PNP dual - never really did it.
Although these duals perform very well, so I never felt the need for this kind of comparison 🙂