Discussion - What makes a speaker sound dynamic

Status
Not open for further replies.
Why would a lighter cone be more dynamic?
Because it has less inertia and responds quicker to an impulse. (This is taking the definition of "sounds more dynamic" to be closely related to transient response)
That is not correct, once that driver is part of a loudspeaker system. Faster response to an impulse would mean that the speaker runs to a higher frequency. For a bare speaker the impulse response would indeed be better, but if you put it in a loudspeaker you would remove the high frequencies with a crossover. Then the only factor differentiating the impulse responses of different drivers would be if there are resonances in the pass band. For a direct radiator, which operates between the box resonance and the cone breakup frequencies, this is already close to perfect.

(This of course neglects diffraction and resonances of the surround etc. but that is not my point.)
 
That is not correct, once that driver is part of a loudspeaker system. Faster response to an impulse would mean that the speaker runs to a higher frequency. For a bare speaker the impulse response would indeed be better, but if you put it in a loudspeaker you would remove the high frequencies with a crossover. Then the only factor differentiating the impulse responses of different drivers would be if there are resonances in the pass band. For a direct radiator, which operates between the box resonance and the cone breakup frequencies, this is already close to perfect.

(This of course neglects diffraction and resonances of the surround etc. but that is not my point.)

F=MA Force equals Mass x Acceleration

If the mass is increased (of the cone) the acceleration decreases. Put simply, a lighter cone responds quicker.
 
My previous post might be unclear, so let me try to rephrase it:

Let's say you are designing a two way loudspeaker. There is a target transfer function (frequency response) for the woofer, e.g. fourth order butterworth low pass at 3 kHz. Using a crossover you shape the transfer function to your target. Let's assume the target is met. For the result it does not matter how you got there. A light-coned woofer or one with a heavy cone would now both give the same transfer function: the target transfer function. As the impulse response can be derived from the transfer function*, those impulse responses would also be identical.

*It must be noted that this is only true for minimum phase systems.
 
Last edited:
Let's say you are designing a two way loudspeaker. There is a target transfer function (frequency response) for the woofer, e.g. fourth order butterworth low pass at 3 kHz. Using a crossover you shape the transfer function to your target. Let's assume the target is met. For the result it does not matter how you got there. A light-coned woofer or one with a heavy cone would now both give the same transfer function: the target transfer function. As the impulse response can be derived from the transfer function*, those impulse responses would also be identical.

*It must be noted that this is only true for minimum phase systems.

Are you saying you are building a 4th order Butterworth minimum phase system? 🙂
 
F=MA Force equals Mass x Acceleration

If the mass is increased (of the cone) the acceleration decreases. Put simply, a lighter cone responds quicker.

If you increase the force applied to the heavier cone, you can equal the acceleration initially obtained with the lighter cone.
Another thing to consider : the material of the lighter cone has probably less self-damping properties and may present resonances which compromise the impulse response.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.