Building a Pearl 2

6L6

Moderator
Joined 2010
Paid Member
To eliminate the interference from the PSU, have the RIAA box 3ft from the PSU. Easy. :D

I used the 20-series for my Pearl 2, I wholeheartedly recommend it.

The regulators on the PSB don't get very hot. I wouldn't describe it as much more than warm.
 
Member
Joined 2003
Paid Member
To eliminate the interference from the PSU, have the RIAA box 3ft from the PSU. Easy. :D

I used the 20-series for my Pearl 2, I wholeheartedly recommend it.

The regulators on the PSB don't get very hot. I wouldn't describe it as much more than warm.

The top of my case remains cool. In fact, I place something over the vents when using it, as I found that just breathing over it caused readings to vary. Even after hours of use, top is still cool.

Russellc
 
Thanks for the input, guys! Perhaps I'll go with the 20-series vented chassis and get the Alodine coating on it for a little bit of RFI/EMI protection. I understand the benefit of moving the power supply a little bit away, but I'm also looking at the potential of adding the RIAA box in an equipment rack with 12 other pieces of equipment, so it is not as simple a just moving the power supply box further away because the box above/below it will also have its own AC power transformer...

Good to know that it doesn't generate much heat.
 
Jack,

Glad you like my web page - it's a 15 year accumulation of projects, several of which don't even appear there. If I keep going, we'll need a bigger house soon...

There are about 4 times a year when there are no available hotel rooms in town, and graduation is certainly one of them. Were you in town specifically for graduation, or was this just a poor timing coincidence?
 
Just finished the outboard PSU for the Pearl as well as populating the onboard regulators. I've used a 28v transformer with CRCRC filtering (10,000uF and 10R). The outboard PSU provide 39.2VDC to the onboard regulators, which provide 24.3VDC for the rest of the board.

Everything looks OK, but I'm thinking +/-39.2V is a bit high for the 7824/7924 which specify a maximum input voltage of 40v. Should I put in a few diodes to drop the voltage down a bit?

I've also never used bleeder resistors in a PSU before. These are 2k2 3w and run at about 58c. The datasheet says they max out at 350c, so I presume they are good at this temp.
 

Attachments

  • Pearl PSU.JPG
    Pearl PSU.JPG
    121.9 KB · Views: 613
  • Pearl Board.JPG
    Pearl Board.JPG
    180.3 KB · Views: 602
I was thinking of trying so 20r resistors that I have, but was wondering if they would do any good to bring down voltage since the power supply measures 39.2v all of the way through. It seems that the Pearl does not draw enough current to really make the resistors do much to the voltage.

I'll stick a set of resistors directly after the rectifiers to see how this affects the voltage.
 

6L6

Moderator
Joined 2010
Paid Member
Series resistors after the rectifier will make a noticable drop. It should work great! Also make sure you use large dissipation resistors, as the AC component that they see is quite large.

If you can take a scope shot of the before and after, that would be cool... filtering like that is extremely effective. (As it's so lossy.)
 
Did some measurements with various amounts of resistance placed in various places in the PSU. I'm using a 28v transformer, MUR820 diodes, 0.22uF film cap, 2k2 bleeder resistors, followed by CRCRC made of 10,000uF and 10R 3w resistors. This configuration provides 40.0vDC on the PSU output

To make any real impact on the output, additional resistance needs to either be directly after the rectifier or at the output from the PSU, after the last cap. Also, to make any real impact, the resistance needs to be rather large.

Placing a 20R 5w resistor after the rectifier provides 38.2v out from the PSU, which drops to 37.5v when one Pearl channel board is connected to the PSU. Changing this to 40R after the rectifier provides 37.0v out from the PSU, which drops to about 36.0V with one Pearl channel board connected to the PSU. Both of these changes are a little boring - not much happens here.

If I put a 1kohm 1/4w resistor on the output of the stock configured PSU, it drops the output voltage down to 32.8v with one Pearl channel driven. I figured this largely killed the value of all of the capacitance in the PSU.

Things got interesting, though, when I put a larger resistor after the rectifier. I tried a 390R 3w resistor and this dropped the PSU output to 23.8v - too low to be useful.

So, I paralleled two 390R 3w resistors (~200R) and this provided 26.3v DC on the PSU output when driving both Pearl boards, still enough to drive the output of the Pearl regulator to full power at 24.3v.

Three images from my scope are below. The first one is taken directly after the rectifier and before the paralleled 390R 3w resistors. This shows 5.48v AC ripple (1v/division) The second image is taken directly after the paralleled 390R resistors and shows 3.6mV (2mV/division) of AC ripple - quite a reduction in ripple! The final image is from the output of the PSU after the last cap. Scope is set to 2mV/division and shows less than 0.1mV ripple.

I will try one more configuration with ~100-120R after the rectifier. I'd like to give the onboard regulator just a bit more headroom.
 

Attachments

  • before resistor.JPG
    before resistor.JPG
    229.9 KB · Views: 563
  • after resistor.JPG
    after resistor.JPG
    215.9 KB · Views: 538
  • PSU output.JPG
    PSU output.JPG
    229 KB · Views: 533
Member
Joined 2003
Paid Member
Just build it stock. Only increase the gain if needed.

(And it won't be needed with that cartridge.)

I built mine stock. Has worked fine with Ortofon Super OM 30, Shure V15 Vxmr, soon to try my SAE 1000 LT.

It also worked fine (with BA-3 preamp) using a Denon 103, which is a fairly low output moving coil, just had to crank the volume a little harder. Another vote for stock unless you need MORE gain.

Russellc