No you didn't. You used the word "fraud", which is a legal term.Joshua_G said:
Just to help us pitch any replies at the appropriate level, could you summarise the level of your scientific education? In the UK most children now study 'general science' to age 16, which teaches them some scientific words but not much science. Even A-level (age 18) now contains very little real science as it is done with minimal maths. I hope the education system in Israel has not been degraded like ours in the UK, but I would expect in most countries that something between school-leaving science and graduate-level would be appropriate to begin to understand the Bybee technical issues.
Be fair, English is not his primary language, which is why I provided him (without any apparent effect) with the Hebrew word for "search." In this case, the colloquial (non-legal) word is הונאה, which is what I'm sure he meant this time.
That is not an explanation, but a collection of scientific words in valid but meaningless English sentences. It claims to be able to isolate and absorb specific electrons. Two problems with this: signals (and noise) are not carried by specific electrons but by the whole ensemble of electrons; there is no such thing as a specific electron, as all electrons are indistinguishable. Mr. Bybee will have to do better than that if he wants to be taken seriously by scientists.john curl said:
Pavel,
But in that literature from Bybee it does list Neodymium material in the matrix. So the bad electrons must be magnetically charged differently than the good ones and it just magnetically sucks out the bad guys!
I see you are playing with us, hinting at the real effect.
Think of it in terms of red electrons and blue electrons. The device merely chooses between the two.
jn
Everyone gets Top Secret. I had ATOMAL and CTS (Cosmic Top Secret) for some time, many years ago, I don't even dare to think about what it was about...
Jan
Need to know and all that
Last edited:
- Status
- Not open for further replies.