No you didn't. You used the word "fraud", which is a legal term.Joshua_G said:I didn't refer to legal terms, I referred to scientific terms.
Just to help us pitch any replies at the appropriate level, could you summarise the level of your scientific education? In the UK most children now study 'general science' to age 16, which teaches them some scientific words but not much science. Even A-level (age 18) now contains very little real science as it is done with minimal maths. I hope the education system in Israel has not been degraded like ours in the UK, but I would expect in most countries that something between school-leaving science and graduate-level would be appropriate to begin to understand the Bybee technical issues.
No you didn't. You used the word "fraud", which is a legal term.
Be fair, English is not his primary language, which is why I provided him (without any apparent effect) with the Hebrew word for "search." In this case, the colloquial (non-legal) word is הונאה, which is what I'm sure he meant this time.
Tommy1000, just to keep speculation to a minimum, this was what earlier devices measured about 20 years ago. The resistive value was about 0.3 ohms then. Today, it is 0.025 ohms.
And this is different from a simple resistor of the same value how?
jn
This is an earlier (20 years earlier) explanation of a Bybee device and a test that showed what it did. Sorry for the cropping and the lack of resolution. I can get this to you later. The big thing is what materials were used in the original (larger) devices.
Attachments
The main thing is it is NOT an inductor or a capacitor.
No, agreed, it's not. It's a resistor.
And the squiggly lines trotted out on cue!
Sorry Mooly, I don't know how to make them right.
Are you on a MAC ?
How To Rotate Images or Pictures On Mac OSX | Alvin Poh's Blog
No, agreed, it's not. It's a resistor.
And the squiggly lines trotted out on cue!
Yah, that old neutral-ground voltage plot.
What would that device do during a bolted fault in a 20 amp circuit? Would it clear to prevent the breaker from actuating?
I'm constantly amazed by the lack of understanding of power feed noise and grounding issues.
jn
That is not an explanation, but a collection of scientific words in valid but meaningless English sentences. It claims to be able to isolate and absorb specific electrons. Two problems with this: signals (and noise) are not carried by specific electrons but by the whole ensemble of electrons; there is no such thing as a specific electron, as all electrons are indistinguishable. Mr. Bybee will have to do better than that if he wants to be taken seriously by scientists.john curl said:This is an earlier (20 years earlier) explanation of a Bybee device
I would like to learn something new here. What is the difference between the 'specific electron' and a 'standard electron'? 😉
The 'specific' electron is specified in John's image. Only a 'specific electron' is isolated, the other electron guys are allowed to pass through.
The 'specific' electron is specified in John's image. Only a 'specific electron' is isolated, the other electron guys are allowed to pass through.
Pavel,
But in that literature from Bybee it does list Neodymium material in the matrix. So the bad electrons must be magnetically charged differently than the good ones and it just magnetically sucks out the bad guys!

But in that literature from Bybee it does list Neodymium material in the matrix. So the bad electrons must be magnetically charged differently than the good ones and it just magnetically sucks out the bad guys!


You could use the Dyson principal. The dirty electrons could be put in a vortex and the extra dirt would add to there mass and you could separate them out by their molecular weight. Not.
Pavel,
But in that literature from Bybee it does list Neodymium material in the matrix. So the bad electrons must be magnetically charged differently than the good ones and it just magnetically sucks out the bad guys!![]()
I see you are playing with us, hinting at the real effect.😀
Think of it in terms of red electrons and blue electrons. The device merely chooses between the two.
jn
Everyone gets Top Secret. I had ATOMAL and CTS (Cosmic Top Secret) for some time, many years ago, I don't even dare to think about what it was about...😱
Jan
Need to know and all that
Last edited:
The 'specific' electron is specified in John's image. Only a 'specific electron' is isolated, the other electron guys are allowed to pass through.
Fermi and Dirac roll in their graves. 😀
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Member Areas
- The Lounge
- John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier part II