yeah
Papa's Kung
is funniest
Fu
![]()
So nice Zen Mod, it comes in my special 😎 folder!
entire thread can go in your special folder 
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/pass-labs/198589-papas-pubs.html

http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/pass-labs/198589-papas-pubs.html
Zen Mod. You did a great job in that special folder.entire thread can go in your special folder
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/pass-labs/198589-papas-pubs.html
One more step to STASIS[R] for lhquam's schematic. Is a minimal current fluctuation in the amplifying MOSFETs needed?Threshold days?
Of course it all depends on what you mean by the word needed''
My remark about Ihquam was to mean that he anticipates some of the same
variations that I do....
😎
My remark about Ihquam was to mean that he anticipates some of the same
variations that I do....
😎
Papa's Kung
is funniest
To put it in context, that is about 35 years old.
😎
[We] are looking forward to your variations on F6 that you wrote about earlier. You taught the world that STASIS[R] is an amplifying conditition whereby a constant voltage is put across the amplifying transistor [cascode it] and a constant current is enabled to flow through the transistor. Constant must mean neededOf course it all depends on what you mean by the word needed''
My remark about Ihquam was to mean that he anticipates some of the same
variations that I do....
😎
That looks like Stasis. Note that the drive fets are used as source followers. Is there a patent for a common-source cascoded output stage?that would be #4107619
is that Stasis ?
Simulations of a circuit based on post #4540 http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/pass-labs/216616-f6-amplifier-454.html#post3527968 suggest that it would perform very well with NO FEEDBACK, having an open-loop gain of about 70 into 8 ohms and -3dB at 67kHz.
The artwork is finished and I intend to order PCBs tomorrow.
The artwork is finished and I intend to order PCBs tomorrow.
And this is how to get bias vs. temperature stability with ordinary MOSFETs:
any problems if + leg of V2 is connected to junction of R4/Q3 and - leg of V1 to junction of R5/Q6 ? Eliminates the coupling cap ?
Yes. Doing what you suggest would eliminate any need for R4 and R5, but those resistors are important for bias current stabilization. As MOSFET temperatures rise, the MOSFET current will increase for a given value of Vgs, but the voltage drop across R4 and R5 will increase, thus reducing Vgs. Thus, R4 and R5 provide negative feedback for the DC bias of the MOSFETs.any problems if + leg of V2 is connected to junction of R4/Q3 and - leg of V1 to junction of R5/Q6 ? Eliminates the coupling cap ?
Please count me in for 2 PCBs if that is possible. -3dB by your simulation is ~10 times that observed by Mr. Pass for F6. This is a remarkable improvement. Pass Feedback from this high Zo output port to the inverting port is expected to give your amp triode-ish instead of pentodish characteristics.Simulations of a circuit based on post #4540 http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/pass-labs/216616-f6-amplifier-454.html#post3527968 suggest that it would perform very well with NO FEEDBACK, having an open-loop gain of about 70 into 8 ohms and -3dB at 67kHz.
The artwork is finished and I intend to order PCBs tomorrow.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Pass Labs
- F6 Amplifier