Bybee Quantum Purifier Measurement and Analysis

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ed:

It looks like the ringing has at least 10 cycles within a roughly 1 uSec timeframe. That would make the ringing approximately 10 Mhz. If you are saying that you have a slight lowering of this 10Mhz content, then you are indeed working in the RF range. Not an easy thing to do accurately.

What L would be required to give this result at 10Mhz?

Can you explain what the pic is showing? It says a peak to peak in the 11 volt range, with a 2 uSec period.. The time scale is 5 uSec and the vert scale is 5 mV, so I could use a little help with the explanation. Thanks.

Cheers, John


John,

You are right on the spike clipper some information is lost. If the spike were not clipped the following circuits may clip or saturate and the result is even worse. So I think we are in agreement.

The issue of requiring Maxwell's Demon or equivalent is moot, because we do have some information about the noise that is out of band and can safely reduce that (Yes band edges will reduce some information) and clipping the spikes also reduces noise again with another loss of information. But the final result is an improvement in performance of the system following the Demon or equal.

As to the rest of the questions, I may have more about the device in question tomorrow, as the folks who consider some of the information a trade secret have been following this thread and may let the construction details be shown.

The required L would be 15uh. The top peak to the bottom of the peak I assume on the entire trace is 11mV.
 
My prototype noise source and filter. First shot is outside sealed up to prevent EMI confusion, the second the insides!
 

Attachments

  • 2011_0127Misc0006.JPG
    2011_0127Misc0006.JPG
    575 KB · Views: 318
  • 2011_0127Misc0009.JPG
    2011_0127Misc0009.JPG
    538.4 KB · Views: 310
Now the starting point 7 wires 1 14 gauge the other 6 cat5 scraps. Wrap the six small wires two or three turns around the uninsulated thicker one. Note the direction of wind. Be sure they do not cross over each other. Secure them with a piece of 1/4" diameter heatshrink.
 

Attachments

  • 2011_0127Misc0001.JPG
    2011_0127Misc0001.JPG
    671.8 KB · Views: 309
  • 2011_0127Misc0003.JPG
    2011_0127Misc0003.JPG
    605.9 KB · Views: 297
  • 2011_0127Misc0004.JPG
    2011_0127Misc0004.JPG
    353.9 KB · Views: 299
Last edited:
Now why does this attenuate high frequency noise? What is the impedance at the frequencies we wish to pass unaltered? (Rhetorical questions no need to answer.)

Imagine the magnetic field that is generated by current within the 14 guage wire. Use the right hand rule.

Now, think of the wrapped wires as having a common centroid with the 14 guage wire.

The resistor completes a conductive loop which traps magnetic field.

Now, think about the current that can flow within the loop. It couples to the primary, it's voltage is proportional to the rate of change of the magnetic field caused by the current.

So what is it? The resistor sees current proportional to the rate of change of the field, so dissipation is hi-pass.

You've made a hi-pass filter. A convoluted one, but one nonetheless. And this hi-pass filter couples to a dissipative element. So, the overall effect is one of hi frequency attenuation.

Neat..

Boost the frequency up two orders of magnitude, change the wiring a tad, and voila...a directional coupler. I learned about those widgits back in '74.

Cheers, John
 
You've made a hi-pass filter. A convoluted one, but one nonetheless. And this hi-pass filter couples to a dissipative element. So, the overall effect is one of hi frequency attenuation.
The dissipative element is the 6 x 1 ohm resistors.
The QP outer sleeve measures 15 ohms end to end (according to a post somewhere).
Does the QP constitute a resistive load at high frequencies ?.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.