Goldmund Mods, Improvements, Stability

+ and - schematic for the preregulated shunt...

- keantoken
 

Attachments

  • KShuntPreregulated_schem.png
    KShuntPreregulated_schem.png
    101.9 KB · Views: 472
I think I get it. Problem with the caps though is that if they sit on top of the rails and we use 16V ones, the upper rails ground at HF will effectively become the power amp rails. I think this is asking for trouble.

- keantoken

Kean what makes you say that? What does HF have to do with the supply rails.

You are in effect adding a 9V battery to each rail, do you think it will become more than 9V because of some magic called HF? Who is he anyway?
 
keantoken,

The power supply in post 1367 is a terrible overkill. What does it do better that a simple circuit? What difference does it make? What are the specs? The PSRR of the output stage will dominate, so it doesn't make sense to use all these parts for the low voltage regulator.

How are you doing on the thermal analysis?

Rick
 
Rick,

this is where DIYers live out their fantacies. Value engineering comes much later in life. At first you throw as many components as you can at a problem because it has to be complex, later when you become an engineer you see how few componets can achieve the same result.

Nico
 
🙂Rico you sound like a Muntz ING engineer...🙂

From Wikipedia:

Muntz played the madman in his unorthodox television commercials, but in fact he was a shrewd businessman and a self-taught electrical engineer. By trial and error, taking apart and studying Philco, RCA, and DuMont televisions, he figured out how to reduce the devices' electrical components to their minimum functional number.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madman_Muntz#cite_note-sickels-20 This practice became known as "Muntzing

I like to think we are a cut above that paradigm...:smash:
 
Whatever you believe, to be fact which includes HF.

Nico, could you restate this?

Sawreyrw, beats me. They say a good CCS makes a good shunt, and cascoding it was the only thing I could do to increase performance. Dunno yet, haven't built it yet.

I haven't got the amp thermal sim up yet. That is what I'll do next.

Muntzing:

He literally carried a pair of wire clippers around and when he felt that one of his builders was overengineering a circuit, he would begin snipping components out. When the TV stopped functioning, they would reinsert the last part and leave the TV as-is.

From Wikipedia.

- keantoken
 
If you want/need another view:
Use dual secondaries for the main PSU. bridge rectify each secondary.
Use dual secondaries for the little transformer. Tap the 9Vac onto the 45Vac to create 54Vac Bridge rectify this low current supply for +ve and bridge rectify the other 54Vac for -ve.
Now couple all the zero volts together.

This fits with not importing the mains PSU ripple and transient glitches into the low current supplies.
 
Hi Krisfr,

Never heard of the term value engineeringor value management? 😕

I always thought that institutions of learning as enacted in the movies were for entertainment, maybe I was wrong and it is actual. 😱

I spent years training and leading Process Improvement teams. A rewarding experience if properly performed - "if properly performed" being a key aspect to success. If you are successful it really will show you the way to improving performance, quality and cost of your product or services. If your competitor is doing this better than you are then you are about to get your *** kicked in regards to profit ratio, customer satisfaction - blah blah blah. I loved doing that stuff!!!
 
I spent years training and leading Process Improvement teams. A rewarding experience if properly performed - "if properly performed" being a key aspect to success. If you are successful it really will show you the way to improving performance, quality and cost of your product or services. If your competitor is doing this better than you are then you are about to get your *** kicked in regards to profit ratio, customer satisfaction - blah blah blah. I loved doing that stuff!!!

Hi C2Cthomas,

at least there are some on the forum that apreciates the whole engineering process. It is amazing how much do nothing cr*p are added to circuits thinking that it is smart.

Since this subject is of interest to you I suppose then you also subscribe to MTBF and mimum component count to perform the specific function amicably.

Kindest regards

Nico
 
Why don't layout jumper positions, so some could only populate the capacitor multiplier part, and others the CCSed parallel reg too. So both persuasions can have it the way they like in one board, not to make a reg second board in any case and avoid extra cost. It will also be a nice opportunity to listen with or without the whole thing and compare for those curious, and Kean's reg work not to pass non evaluated.:wrench: