I know that an accurate system will reproduce a bad recording......bad.
No confusion here.What I meant is that none of us has to listen to such recordings as they are.
The ability to localize sounds develops from within and IS therefore innate. I don't know of anyone who has ever taught his child to localize sounds.
John
Consider the test setup. When the battery powered source is NOT driving the system, then the measurement will only see hum and noise.
When the battery powered source is driving the power amplifier, the measurement obtained will be the result of the power drawn by the amplifier and coupled into the input loop.
The first case is a simple hum and noise test.
The second is the geometric reaction to the energies being bandied about.
If the second produces measureable results, then you are seeing a distortion mechanism which clearly alters the musical content that the power stage will see. It is a result of the wiring around the devices, the internal couplings of the source and amplifier, and the odd harmonic power draw of the amplifier itself.
None of this is measureable when the components are seperated. The wire does not create it, nor the source, nor the amp.
It is the connection of the three that does it, and only when significant power is drawn.
Cheers, John
Everything is connected, hallelujah! Still we don't know what audible errors the univers injects in our beloved audio gear.
I know that an accurate system will reproduce a bad recording......bad.
What I meant is that none of us has to listen to such recordings as they are.
Absolutely, We have to do what we can to improve those recordings.
You believe that cables improve bad recordings, I think EQing improve bad recordings.
I must be a pain to swap cables for every different flaw in those recordings?
Hi neededandwanted,
I could suggest some other things to use this for, but that would just be stirring the pot!
-Chris
I think that we should all recondition our speaker wire by replacing the electrons periodically. Hook them up to a DC source for a bit each year. You could charge for that service.
I could suggest some other things to use this for, but that would just be stirring the pot!
-Chris
That is the field of work my wife has been in since she left teaching in medical school in 1984. I may have overheard a thing or two.
Lol, uniformed tests are done daily. Subjectivity is at work 24/7.
From Cameras showing people choosing products based on bias to the blind taste tests from win to Coke vs pepsi that happen around the world. From golf ball testing to diet pills.
I stand behing that One billion number.easily.
Bias has a presents and to argue against this is about as wild as you can get in the realm of logic.
They are not used in many studies. When they are used, they are not the often mentioned sugar pills. Sometimes they are not pills at all.
There might be one or two things you know about audio but, denials to the contrary, the bulk of your posts are indeed trite sideswipes. You seem to be under the illusion that the believers are trying to convert you and the other deniers to their way of thinking in regard to cables, and as such you demand that the believers provide proof that they hear differences, but the problem with that little scenario is that the believers for the most part don't really care whether or not you hear cabling differences or not. The prevailing believer's attitude is that if you hear differences, then great, and if you don't hear differences, then that's OK too. To each his own. Live and let live. End of story.
But I suspect that there some amongst us that like to be the center of attention, and seeing as it's difficult to argue with the live-and-let-live attitude that the believers practice, then the only way to stay in the game is to make trite sideswipes towards the other thread participants and what they have to say. Instead of being an *** and driving away those that want to engage in civil discourse in regard to cables, why not go listen to some music instead? Or is your system so unresolving and boring that it's not pleasurable to listen to music through it, so you instead get your jollies belittling those who don't hold the same opinions and beliefs in regard to cabling that you do?
Absolutely, We have to do what we can to improve those recordings.
You believe that cables improve bad recordings, I think EQing improve bad recordings.
I must be a pain to swap cables for every different flaw in those recordings?
I consider mix and match of speaker A to Amplifier B,a form of "EQing",and the cables I use,also a good match to my system and taste.Where do you not agree?
My speakers cost 3 tmes more than my turntable,cd player,amplifier and cables put together.None of my equipment suffers imo more than the systems of most here
I am closing this thread for a bit while I wade through it and clean out the muck.
Go find something else to do for a while. Not sure how long this is going to take.
Don't bother filling up my inbox with comments or complaints, I'll just delete them anyway so just go find something else to do for now.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.