Your next compression driver?

why bother due to the crazy low (or normal, VS other brands) price of this unit

Because it is cheaper, enviroment friendly and lower shipping expense to use recone than whole compression driver.

I know about Cedric's website. He made that comparison but it is debatable what is subjectively more/less important of those measuring parameters he used to form a list valuing them equally.
 
Last edited:
I must say yes and Iagree, more friendly and more green. I would say they don't bother as it's cheap for the customer. But Seas tweeters are cheap for some and you can find the recone parts. I rate these brands higher as a customer 🙂. It should cost them as factory makers more monney because of the supply chain complexity related to the low ratio difference between the spare part and the whole reference ! It pays elsewhere ...
 
Last edited:
Peerless DFM2535 seem to be out of stock in most shops and limited stock for tlhp that still has few of them.

Are we going to witness the same scenario that happened for transducers used in Kii Three with minimum order quantity over 100-500 pieces ?

Stay tuned 🙂
 
I didn't see it anywhere on the web so, dfm2535:

View attachment 962616

You can't get a recone for this one, can you. If it breaks, buy a new transducer.

Thanks for the pic, I daren't open mine for fear of dropping my vape on it or it or something equally stupid to damage it.

I've only used two compression drivers and this Peerless was my first and made me wonder why some people don't like CDs as it is super sweet.
 
I have (had?) hope for BMS 5530ND which seem to be designed 6-7 year later than the 3550. But comparing their presented data I wonder if they just made the 5530 to be smaller with same performance....? Or maybe the old one is actually a bit better?

I have the same question really 🙂

5530 in red...

//
 

Attachments

  • FrDist_BMS_4550vs5530.jpg
    FrDist_BMS_4550vs5530.jpg
    297.1 KB · Views: 241
  • Imp_BMS_4550vs5530.jpg
    Imp_BMS_4550vs5530.jpg
    334.1 KB · Views: 232
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ErnieM
Damn! We need more free diy time! I think we are a lot in this situation, i just postponed an amplifier built because highest priority work have to be done on the house... i hate when masonmery take over electronic or woodworking ( depend of the woodwork: i have 15x 10m height thuja to get rid off in my backyard, this will be a lot of non fun woodworking). At least this is still diy...
 
@fluid , I also picked up the 5530nd

I was so excited for it to be good …. And it’s not amazing but it’s good. The 4552nd is better and it’s pretty easy to tell just by listening…

It has a flat sound that I think BMS likes to call “transparent”…I like a little horn gak I know how to tune it out, it’s the 2-3k octave Just need tamed, and 2-3k can give such powerful presence it’s what I love the most, this one is smooth out of box and no gak , so perfect for the no dsp ppl , and this one however does play to 500hz before it breaks up… that’s impressive!

I like the 2408h better for everything above 2k, below 2k this one just gets down… and it excellent sounding below 1200hz …(all compression drivers sound about the same past 3k to there natural rolloff so meh) this one has fantastic highs…. I’m giving good and bad and being picky

At stadium levels it would need to be crossed at about 1k (2nd order) but for low to normal levels I have crossed it on a 500hz horn using a 48db linear phase filter and it doesn’t jam or hit the phase plug nor does it get constrained….

Realistically I would cross at 700 with a LR4 and I bet most ppl would find that works fantastic…

I ended up loading it on a 1k waveguide and it does sound good….

Altho ….. again, the 4552nd does indeed sound better , and I think they know it hence half the price as the former…

Overall a great buy , for 270$ea it’s a fantastic driver…. Miles ahead of anything in the 100-150$ price range and they priced it just right for what you get….

I think I’ll keep it
 

Attachments

  • C9CFE6F8-DCD4-4620-813D-F373D42FBC12.jpeg
    C9CFE6F8-DCD4-4620-813D-F373D42FBC12.jpeg
    395.2 KB · Views: 194
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: matthiasw