Warbler; Mos/Schade MOS/SIT choke loaded follower power amp

all roads are leading to Rome

:clown:


in many cases, cheapskate/dumpster diver approach is giving enormous joy


:devily:
Is there any other approach? :rofl:
Now imagine me bringing... Uhm... 4, no, 8 microwave ovens from the dumpster.
I will say that I am building a new fusion reactor by using 8 magnetrons in a star configuration and a gram of Helium 3 as a fuel, maybe someone will believe and pay for that, so I can buy bigger speakers! :rofl:
 
in fact, I believe there is a way of doing it even better, mostly thinking of better Iq stability in dynamic domain

stiffer Iq with large signals and much faster recovery

oh well, can't always end with what's drawn on first napkin, sometimes second one is better

:rofl:

in short, out with optocoupler, in with current mirror

Warbler postponed to final version, whichever one ends as one
maybe it's a good idea to clarify this

difference between (note C5, 470uF):

warbler-schm-png.1069190



and (note C3, 470uF):

final-one-with-cm-png.1069210




crucial part for integrating function of biasing mechanism is 470uF cap , which positive end is establishing voltage level for 100K, JFets gates biasing voltage; of course that JFets source is following gate voltage , thus establishing gate voltage level for big output part, setting Iq

in case of substantial voltage swing at output ( large signal condition), there are also large current changes through 0R22 sense resistors, so that's translating to changes in voltage across said 470uF

point is - when using optocoupler based circuit (pic 1) - level of integration stability is lower / changes of 470uF cap voltage are greater than in case of current mirror based circ (pic 2), and also ...... when large signal is over, recovery time that circuit is settled again to programmed Iq, with CM based circuit recovery time is much much faster

all of that being experience with Babelfish XA252, same as direct comparison between, say, SissySIT R.3 and SissySIT (42)

so, why not gilding da Lilly, when you can ..... :clown:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
OK, as I promised - revised and (sorta, will explain later) final schematic

Forgot to bring ant pic-taking apparatus to workshop with me today, blissful silence of cellphone, when absent :rofl:

Anyway - pics of populated pcb shown in #28

Due to change in biasing circuit, it's now rock stable, in all manners - with temperature change, with rail change, big modulation etc.

I'm completely happy with revision
 

Attachments

  • Warbler schm.png
    Warbler schm.png
    179.8 KB · Views: 63
Last edited:
Pure Mos iteration

Everything the same as explained in start of the thread - same crummy choke ( uWave xformer primary) , negative rail aroundish 35Vdc, Iq 3A2

so, MOS, 8R load
 

Attachments

  • Warbler MOS 1W 8R.png
    Warbler MOS 1W 8R.png
    7.3 KB · Views: 23
  • Warbler MOS 5W 8R.png
    Warbler MOS 5W 8R.png
    7.3 KB · Views: 27
  • Warbler MOS 10W 8R.png
    Warbler MOS 10W 8R.png
    7.3 KB · Views: 23
  • Warbler MOS THD vs. Freq. 8R.png
    Warbler MOS THD vs. Freq. 8R.png
    9.6 KB · Views: 19
  • Warbler MOS Freq. 8R.png
    Warbler MOS Freq. 8R.png
    5.6 KB · Views: 26
MOS Schade arrangement

R21 changed to 750R, R22 (18K) populated

8R load
 

Attachments

  • Warbler Schade 1W 8R.png
    Warbler Schade 1W 8R.png
    34.7 KB · Views: 18
  • Warbler Schade 5W 8R.png
    Warbler Schade 5W 8R.png
    35.8 KB · Views: 18
  • Warbler Schade 10W 8R.png
    Warbler Schade 10W 8R.png
    36.5 KB · Views: 10
  • Warbler Schade Freq.  8R.png
    Warbler Schade Freq. 8R.png
    47 KB · Views: 8
  • Warbler Schade THD vs. Freq.  8R.png
    Warbler Schade THD vs. Freq. 8R.png
    50.7 KB · Views: 18
SIT arrangement, same conditions as above, THF51S as active device

8R load
 

Attachments

  • Warbler THF51 1W 8R.png
    Warbler THF51 1W 8R.png
    34 KB · Views: 31
  • Warbler THF51 5W 8R.png
    Warbler THF51 5W 8R.png
    34.8 KB · Views: 31
  • Warbler THF51 10W 8R.png
    Warbler THF51 10W 8R.png
    39.5 KB · Views: 22
  • Warbler THF51 Freq. 8R.png
    Warbler THF51 Freq. 8R.png
    5.7 KB · Views: 20
  • Warbler THF51 THD vs. Freq. 8R.png
    Warbler THF51 THD vs. Freq. 8R.png
    49.7 KB · Views: 31
now, 2SK2087C as active element

negative rail decreased to -25V, Iq set at (moderate) 2A

that's ballpark really, not carved in stone - rail can be little lower or higher, Iq can be higher

I mean - my gut telling me that anything up to 70W of heat per one 2SK2087C is safe, as long it's properly cooled

which means - thin mica and proper ( not no-name) thermal goop, or 86/82 Keratherm pad; last one demanding torque wrench, 0.9Nm, to avoid uncontrollable squeeze of soft pad

so, 2SK2087C

8R load
 

Attachments

  • Warbler 2Sk2087C 1W 8R.png
    Warbler 2Sk2087C 1W 8R.png
    34.5 KB · Views: 25
  • Warbler 2Sk2087C 10W 8R.png
    Warbler 2Sk2087C 10W 8R.png
    7.8 KB · Views: 25
  • Warbler 2Sk2087C 5W 8R.png
    Warbler 2Sk2087C 5W 8R.png
    7.5 KB · Views: 24
  • Warbler 2Sk2087C Freq. 8R.png
    Warbler 2Sk2087C Freq. 8R.png
    5.9 KB · Views: 19
  • Warbler 2Sk2087C THD vs. Freq. 8R.png
    Warbler 2Sk2087C THD vs. Freq. 8R.png
    49.2 KB · Views: 26
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
OK, as I promised - revised and (sorta, will explain later) final schematic

.........


later:


PowerUp/PowerOn thump just a little stronger than I can tolerate. In fact, nothing dangerous but I know that there would be difference - driving my 15" Tanns I know that thup is going to be naahwhocares, but with RCA of same size, them being almost microphone-like sensitive, thump would be ear-brain-nerve wracking, even if electrically benign

so m aking that change is gilding da lilly or matter of principle, whatever

so, decided to change pcb and incorporate thump eliminator (one small automotive relay and few itsybitsies), already proven in Choked Singing Bush ( that one still to come, really tried just function of said subcircuit)


will post some graphical amusement as soon I made pcb files with that; nice enjoyable evening in front of me, reading, drawing pcbs, some interesting movie - who can ask for more?
 
ok, here it is

final final

:rofl:

final

added relay across speaker output pads

during startup, relay/speaker is shorted for few seconds, so output cap is being charged through relay, not speaker coil; after that, relay is energized thus speaker left alone and free to sing

when powered Off, due to ultra small filter/smoothing cap in relay supply line (10uF), relay is momentary switched Off, thus shorting speaker coil and output cap is discharged through relay short

easy peasy

tomorrow, if not lazy, Choked Singing Bush; that one MOS Schade ( not interested in pure pentode MOS) and SIT - both THF51 and 2SK2087C
 

Attachments

  • Warbler Eagle sshot.png
    Warbler Eagle sshot.png
    91.6 KB · Views: 90
  • Warbler top render.png
    Warbler top render.png
    1.1 MB · Views: 51
  • Warbler bottom render.png
    Warbler bottom render.png
    888.2 KB · Views: 82
  • Warbler schmtc.png
    Warbler schmtc.png
    387.5 KB · Views: 91
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user