No more peak, no more overshoot
the j113 is the best compromise between distortion and stability
the j113 is the best compromise between distortion and stability

No more peak, no more overshoot
the j113 is the best compromise between distortion and stability
![]()
Thank you for satisfying my curiosity. I would call the step response characteristic something like on the verge of oscillation. Critically damped if you will.
During the rise, before the damped ring-down on the flat top, there are two distinct different slopes. I am curious why the rise has two different slopes.
HI
As I use bipolar VAS and IRFP150N output, the IRF9520 is always the best suited for temp compensattion or there is better ?
thanks
As I use bipolar VAS and IRFP150N output, the IRF9520 is always the best suited for temp compensattion or there is better ?
thanks
Last edited:
Bonjour,
Last try with with J113, dual compensation proposed by Elvee. (Thank you)
square wave with 10uF and 1uF
89° phase margin with 1uF
spice file : Simple CFA Circlotron J113 version | Circlotron Audio
I will do the same with the 2SK170
Last try with with J113, dual compensation proposed by Elvee. (Thank you)


square wave with 10uF and 1uF


89° phase margin with 1uF


spice file : Simple CFA Circlotron J113 version | Circlotron Audio
I will do the same with the 2SK170
Last edited:
Nice damped ringing insured by output inclusive compensation.
Try to be completely GND independent (high Z to GND), meaning true balanced input (XLR: pin2, pin 3 only), so connect mid 100 k input node (now GND) to mid 100 R (2 x 50 R) feedback node and sim if it is problem free.
Try to be completely GND independent (high Z to GND), meaning true balanced input (XLR: pin2, pin 3 only), so connect mid 100 k input node (now GND) to mid 100 R (2 x 50 R) feedback node and sim if it is problem free.
HI,
Thank you for your interest, I tried to remove the GND
I have trouble choosing a reasonable current, 20X feedback and have a sinus output
With 50ohm on RA I have a good sinus but 8mA on Jfet
Thank you for your interest, I tried to remove the GND
I have trouble choosing a reasonable current, 20X feedback and have a sinus output
With 50ohm on RA I have a good sinus but 8mA on Jfet
Attachments
Last edited:
Nice damped ringing insured by output inclusive compensation.
Try to be completely GND independent (high Z to GND), meaning true balanced input (XLR: pin2, pin 3 only), so connect mid 100 k input node (now GND) to mid 100 R (2 x 50 R) feedback node and sim if it is problem free.
In your opinion the BC560 are enough to dissipate 200mW idle and 285mw Max?
The KSA1381 are no longer available
with R5 and R6 at 845ohm we could have 24V supply, so 166mW idle and 258mW peak with 28V peak out
HI banat,
yes I will try this compensation solution. thanks
Do you remember ?
https://www.diyaudio.com/forums/att...1410021153-vssa-circlotron-drive-modified-jpg
yes I will try this compensation solution. thanks
Do you remember ?
For shure that it is possible to acomodate that VAS on your VSSA Circlotron project , it is look nice with that CCS on VAS collector side , any way try to simulate this schematic to .
https://www.diyaudio.com/forums/att...1410021153-vssa-circlotron-drive-modified-jpg
A small test during the lunch break 😀
It works, but it would take a VDS> 40V
(do not watch compensation)
I tried, it does not work, Do you want asc?
for the moment the only one that gives a good result is the one that Elvee had proposed, but it must be adapted
It works, but it would take a VDS> 40V
(do not watch compensation)

Alternative closer to ground connection of neutralization elements C6/R24 and C7/R25 🙂
I tried, it does not work, Do you want asc?
for the moment the only one that gives a good result is the one that Elvee had proposed, but it must be adapted
Last edited:
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Solid State
- VSSA Circlotron