@Galu , bloody hell, how much meters is 7.8 hz ?!
Nasa researcher : definition : a guy who is ready to send a man to death with a one way ticket to Mars to keep his job and good incomes and explaining this is fantastic and a gift to the human species to conquer the universe w/o pulling the flush here biut eventually found foam technology for our beds.
I would like they focus on how reducing the sky pollution... sorry I mean the global warming.
Nasa researcher : definition : a guy who is ready to send a man to death with a one way ticket to Mars to keep his job and good incomes and explaining this is fantastic and a gift to the human species to conquer the universe w/o pulling the flush here biut eventually found foam technology for our beds.
I would like they focus on how reducing the sky pollution... sorry I mean the global warming.
Last edited:
By contrast the acoustic Schumann frequency wavelength is only 44 meters. Note, that must be one helluva long antenna in those Schumann EM generators. 😲
Next thing we know, some cheeky chappy will be marketing a device that is said to emit an acoustic wave of frequency 7.83 Hz, claiming that it makes your hi-fi sound better! 😀
44 meters are unaceptable for protcology ! Me run to build myself a concrete anti alliens shelter !
Note to self: pseudo skeptics oft provide no evidence whatsoever to support their claims. Not even math. Google may not be their friend sometimes. At least they could say it’s a placebo effect. Come on, guys.
Pseudoskepticism is a form of dogmatism, which refers to any belief which is held unquestioningly and with undefended certainty.
A quick google informed me of that! 😉
As a scientist, I am quite the opposite of a pseudo skeptic, always questioning and always seeking certainty.
Be free thinkers, guys, and never let your brain die!
If only that pulsed electromagnetic field technology could modify genetic regulation in the human brain at a cellular level, it could prove a revolutionary cure for UFO dogmatism!
@Galu, Pseudo skeptics never think they’re the pseudo skeptics. It’s always someone else.
Real skeptics don’t normally have knee-jerk reactions to statements or claims, they investigate, they’re curious. “I have too much education to fall for that” is the oldest logical fallacy in the book. And when presented with evidence that contradicts their firm beliefs they oft resort to name calling.
The real proof of any outrageous claim or device is if you show it to a PhD in physics he laughs so hard milk squirts out of his nose. QED
Real skeptics don’t normally have knee-jerk reactions to statements or claims, they investigate, they’re curious. “I have too much education to fall for that” is the oldest logical fallacy in the book. And when presented with evidence that contradicts their firm beliefs they oft resort to name calling.
The real proof of any outrageous claim or device is if you show it to a PhD in physics he laughs so hard milk squirts out of his nose. QED
Last edited:
Invisible robots are at this very moment are trying to steal your luggage. Don't just knee-jerk write it off, be a 'real skeptic' and get back with your results.
I must be a real skeptic because I am regularly investigating new scientific claims, many of which turn out to be experimentally unverifiable hypotheses.
"Due to the lack of cooling because of the global warming, plus the potential Greta Thunberg 's thread for our pcbs, we decided as A.I. not to enslave the human beings"
So, in other words, you can’t prove they’re not true but you assume they‘re false anyway.