Unity gain inverting amplifier/buffer

Well you should trust Calvin on that 🙂
Besides you can use 100...220nF there instead of 68 uF.It is used mostly for coupling the RIAA network.The dc bias is fixed and external instead of autobias and you don' t need so much coupling capacitance.A mu- follower needs a higher value source resistor and the RIAA network would have been placed at the source of the follower transistor.
Maybe you are right, I don't know. I thought the mu-follower has this capacitor driving the upper gate and the SRPP not.
 
So what is the design objectives ?
Gain -1, Single Supply 30V, NJFETs, Zero Global Feedback (ZGF) ? Preferably low distortion for 4Vpp ?

For a simple circuit with ZGF, a phase splitter followed by Source follower comes to mind.
But the supply voltage sets some limitations to the phase splitter.
The JFET sees the fully 4V swing at maximum input.
So it needs at least 7~8V across D-S at no signal.
The drain resistor has to be a touch higher than the source resistor to be truly inverted unity gain.
So they should get ~6.5V and ~6V respectively.
The bias is determined by the resistor values. Let's say 4mA as a starting value.
The source resistor is then 1.5k, and 1/Yfs of the JFET is roughly 40R.
That basically determines the amount of distortion at the output.
For 20V, H2 is about 0.05%, and H3 ~10x lower. Tube sound.
At 30V, the values can be halved.

It is known that some BJTs can have low Vce_sat and little Early effect.
And the gm is higher than JFET at the same bias.
As can be seen, the BJT circuit with 20V supply can have half the H2.

Which one would I choose ?
If I can have 30V, I would use NJFET, as H3 is 10dB lower than the BJT version.
If I am stuck with 20V, then no choice but to use BJT for the splitter.

BTW, you don't need to buy expensive 2SK170, and for sure not LSK170.
Just wire a 2SK2145GR in parallel and use as K170GR replacement.
www.diyaudio.com/community/threads/njfets-for-source-follower-applications.329131/


Cheers,
Patrick

.
Thanks for the simulations and the explanation/recommendation. In fact I can have higher voltages if necessary. I'm still in the design phase.
 
Yep you just use a same old typical known op amps for low noise, gain and RIAA
Mystically magical high distortion discrete circuits, don't do much but make distortion.
So comical from small signal to high current to speakers. There is so many lost concepts to engage in.

Complicated circuit. Aside from power supply decoupling.
1 cap 2 resistors = done Anything from .001% THD to .00006% little bit below -60 dB LOL!!

What is next to add to Overthinking longer solutions for easy problems a 18 month permit process to start building nonsense audio.
 
Complicated circuit. Aside from power supply decoupling.
1 cap 2 resistors = done Anything from .001% THD to .00006% little bit below -60 dB LOL!!

What is next to add to Overthinking longer solutions for easy problems a 18 month permit process to start building nonsense audio.
Thank you for your fruitful contribution to this topic. Again, I know that an operational amplifier can be ways better and I'm used to work with them in other circuits. And yes, I know that there is a reason why most circuits today are based on integrated circuits and the manufacturer of them had done a great job providing great solutions since 1958.
 
That is not mu- follower , it is one srpp stage and a follower buffer , it' s using a very passive riaa network as well.I looks like highly nonesensical to me, but I' ve done way more stupid things in life so who am I to judge it?
You could go active like this although the usual configuration is with a passive riaa network in between stages.Just replace tubes with jfets and their usual lower resistor values to go with transistors:
I'm pretty sure you already knows

https://www.ti.com/lit/an/snoa620/snoa620.pdf?ts=1737831833497

where you can find this type of amplifier on page 5. If I got you right, you mean something like this

https://www.valvewizard.co.uk/mufollower.html

without the extra DC offset at the upper gate?
 
I am not a tube guy.
But I guess you are using something like the Ultra High Gain Audio Amplifier in P.5 of TI AN-32.

Then Av = Yfs / Yos / 2 of the lower JFET

If you choose a JFET like MMBF5456, you will have a gain of 50 or less.
You can further reduce the effective Yfs by adding a source resistor to the lower JFET, right ?
http://www.geofex.com/article_folders/foolwfets/foolwfets.htm
It also helps to give you a more manageable bias current.

The upper JFET and the source follower don't have to be the same as the lower JFET, right ?


Patrick
 
Last edited:
Hi,

"I looks like highly nonesensical to me, but I' ve done way more stupid things in life so who am I to judge it?"
Exactly! Before dismissing other´s designs with stark wording rather think about them in depth.
It´ll prevent You from appearing arrogant if not foppish, especially when You seemingly haven´t ´got´ the reasoning behind the design decisions.

back to #36: I came up with these circuits after having seen Alex Nikitin´s designs for Creek (OBH-series) and his contributions here at DIYaudio.
My part was basically having translated his bipolar and hybrid-bipolar-JFET designs into a JFET-only world.
Along this process it became quickly clear why the cap needs to be large ... at min in a medium 1-digit µF range.
So, yes, it makes sense.

As for the gain=-1 buffer application: You could omit with it by just connecting the pickup inverted .... or, if You don´t believe in ´absolute phase´ 😉

jauu
Calvin
 
  • Like
Reactions: EUVL
220nVs68u.jpg


Here a quick example. It's not the same circuit, just quick and dirty with some random components and a riaa network. Notice, that the capacitor C is places at another position. The three results are for 220n, 3.3u and 68u.