The Tango is a good stuff, of course
But the Interstage which brand is?
Walter
The interstage is NC-20F made by ISO Transformers.
[It is the same as Tango NC-20F. As you know
Hirata Tango is no longer in business. The people
from Hirata made a company ISO Transformers,
they make old Hirata Tango models under the
name of ISO transformers.]
Think to buy a good sound card and use a software to test the chain.
It is not a hard job
Walter
I see. I will try to look for solutions I can choose.
Thanks again.
In any case, I would measure the frequency range of the speakers with that tube amp of yours, but also with some SS that has a small output impedance (in the order of milliohms). The simplest measuring program is Holmi Impulse (free software).So I didn't have a chance to try Matrix 800 with solid state amps.
I tested a lot of Tango trafos, are very good of course.The interstage is NC-20F made by ISO Transformers.
[It is the same as Tango NC-20F.
But can you send the schematic of the amp?
Walter
And measure the output impedance of your amps. Like said, it’s quite likely the top end will come out exaggerated due to the high impedance of the speaker above 1kΩ.
The X10s is for one 211 because it has 10 kohm
With two 211 in Pse you need 5 kohm to match correctly ( theory)
With 10k and 4 ohm you will have a better DF ( but less power) but this is not the problem .
Walter
Originally, the designer suggested me to choose between X-5S and X-10S.
X-5S is a 5kOhm transformer. He said X-10S has more primary
inductance (max 80H) and might produce better midrange, while X-5S
can produce more power and can potentially produce better bass.
The maximum power I can get with X-10S is about 35~40Watts per channel.
But, I felt 35Watts is enough for me.
And measure the output impedance of your amps. Like said, it’s quite likely the top end will come out exaggerated due to the high impedance of the speaker above 1kΩ.
I see. I will try.
I don't think it is real value ; how much is the THD?The maximum power I can get with X-10S is about 35~40Watts per channel.
With 5 K ohm as primary can be a right power but less DF and in a speaker as 800 a good DF is fine even with the tube you have a general low Damping factor
Walter
Could an LCR, externally at the speaker connections be used to improve the speaker impedance?
Of course. Linked thread is almost 10 years old, surely one of the most exciting ones, beside many others.
https://www.diyaudio.com/community/...ve-entries-due-by-oct-9th.279893/post-4482563
Come to think of it. By simply removing the bridge between HF and MF terminals one can disable the tweeters.Disconnect both tweeters and put them back in place to close the enclosure.
No easier test to find out if the mid or tweets are the culprit.
I don't think it is real value ; how much is the THD?
With 5 K ohm as primary can be a right power but less DF and in a speaker as 800 a good DF is fine even with the tube you have a general low Damping factor
Walter
I don't know the THD of the amps.
By the way, I don't have a permission from the designer
to make the schematics available to others.
Overall, the schematics is like this.
The two triode sections of 12au7 are connected to form a SRPP.
There is a global negative feedback loop connected from the
speaker output terminal to the cathode bypass cap (which is
then connected to the ground through a 100ohm resistor).
The next stage is 6SN7. The two triode sections are connected
in parallel. The output of this stage is connected to NC20F
interstage transformer.
The output of the interstage is connected to another 6SN7 tube.
Again both inputs and outputs are connected in parallel.
The output of this 6SN7 tube is then connected to 211,
which are again connected in parallel.
Come to think of it. By simply removing the bridge between HF and MF terminals one can disable the tweeters.
No easier test to find out if the mid or tweets are the culprit.
I just don't hear harshness without tweeter.
It is not really like distortion or something.
I just hear more salient high frequency and slight less
mid-highs.
As many people mention, it may be due to my amps.
Might, but unlike other B&W's these speakers are very easy to drive.As many people mention, it may be due to my amps.
I'm following with much interest 🙂
Here's what a CR can do to a woofer impedance. This is with 4uf cap, and 12 ohm resistor. Proper calculations to alter the speaker impedance would likely come up with different values, but the effect could be similar.
Thanks for the information.
There are so many thing I have to learn from now.
I find your advices are eye-opening to me.
I will study it soon because many people are
giving me advices now and I cannot swallow
everything at once.
It was a rhetorical question. 🙂 I was hoping to draw someone into the conversation who was familiar with doing the added compensation. Can you speculate on a CR, or LCR? I think 4uf and 12 ohms may be close, but it's important to be careful. Maybe a zma could be traced, and a filter verified.Of course. Linked thread is almost 10 years old, surely one of the most exciting ones, beside many others.
https://www.diyaudio.com/community/...ve-entries-due-by-oct-9th.279893/post-4482563
The treble is too prominent, and should be muted. However, along with that, some changes will be needed on the crossover, because it is poorly integrated with the midrange. And that will be difficult without measuring equipment. With that DC resistance, the tweeter is practically 6ohms nominal impedance. And as far as I can see from Stereophile measurements, there are also some high-pitched rings on two frequencies.
As you said, I also thought treble should be muted a little bit.
At least the stereophile measurement says that and my hearing
also tells that. For that reason, I didn't try to measure the sound
even though I bought a small measuring mic (UMIK-1). I was not
actually sure how well the mic can measure and was not that
sure about my measuring ability. This is something not what I am
accustomed to.
In any case, this time I will also consider changing the crossover.
Making measurements is fun, but can be tricky at lower frequencies. Maybe practice with a small speaker until you get things working, and know your way around.Thanks for the information.
There are so many thing I have to learn from now.
I find your advices are eye-opening to me.
I will study it soon because many people are
giving me advices now and I cannot swallow
everything at once.
Probably not.
It is otherwise known as a phase issue and the crossover needs to be 1400 Hz not 3000 Hz.
Excluding using truncated mids, then still manage to mount the tweeter far away. With larger center to center spacing than needed.
Excluding 2x mids at 5 inches will behave like 10" vertical like many magical "MTM's"
looking at the midrange response the crossover coil values probably rather poor for the actual impedance.
And with such poor Q and no impedance correction, The peaking response of all the drivers is very visible.
would expect to carry forward for the tweeter as well.
It does, excluding the 3 almost 4 dB response peak and huge dip up higher, AKA lots of cone breakup even at 1 watt.
At this point even Dayton RST28F or RST28A would beat it by a landslide.
With big rear chambers and Fs down in the 700 ish range they can actually cross over at 1400 Hz
Needs a little crossover work for sure, a custom plate be easy to make if needed, since the mounting plates can be changed.
Dear WhiteDragon,
Many people are giving me great advices.
It is very difficult for me to sallow everything at once.
But, you are probably one of the very few who are
giving me the information I was originally seeking.
While it may turn out to be my amps that lead to
the prominent treble.
But, still I wish to try different tweeter because it is
not only the loudness of certain frequency region.
In any case, I am looking at the specs of the above
Dayton speakers.
RST28F:
- nominal 4ohms, DCR 3.0ohms,
- 93.5dB, Fs 775Hz
RST28A:
- nominal 4ohms, DCR 3.0ohms,
- 92.5dB, Fs 775Hz
Do you think I can use either of these
instead of stock tweeters by approprately
changing the crossover?
I was originally thinking about Satori Beryllium tweeter:
Satori TW29BN-B-8 (nominal 8ohms, DCR 6.2ohm, 93.5dB)
or Satori TW29BN-B (nominal 4ohms, DCR 3ohm, 95dB).
Would 92.5dB sensitivity or 93.5dB sensitivity be enough?
What I was worried about was the situation in which I will
have to reduce the gains of the midrange and the bass
because the volume of the new tweeter is too low.
So I first wanted to know whether I have to choose high
efficiency tweeter such as 95dB or higher or I can just go
with 93.5dB tweeter. Could you tell me the answer
if you know it from your experience?
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Multi-Way
- Tweeter Selection for B&W Matrix 800