• WARNING: Tube/Valve amplifiers use potentially LETHAL HIGH VOLTAGES.
    Building, troubleshooting and testing of these amplifiers should only be
    performed by someone who is thoroughly familiar with
    the safety precautions around high voltages.

Tube Watts Question

I test my amplifiers in my own way....
It's established that AC line voltage/current/wattage are real things, and according to Ohms Laws, it is the way we judge actual circuits, right?
Well, 60 Hz AC is also a part of audio, isn't it?
So, I set the signal generator for 60Hz into an amp with an 8 Ohm load and oscilloscope on it.
I bring the level up to just clipping, and read the resulting AC voltage...
Simple, huh?
If the amp is putting out a clean 25.5 volts AC into that 8 Ohm load, I gather it's putting out 150 watts RMS of "continuous" bass, which is a relatively decent stress test.
To hell with all those "peak power" readings.

Back before I could justify buying a signal generator I didn’t even do that. I’d use a 6.3 volt power transformer and a pot as a signal source. You can get by without a scope, too. Use a peak detector (diode and cap) on your DMM and measure DC. Drive the amp *into* audible clipping with the 60 Hz sine wave from the transformer, and calculate equivalent sine wave “RMS” power - Vpeak^2/(2*RL). Don’t forget that pesky factor of two to get “real” watts.

150 watts would measure 34.6 volts RMS. Or 49 volts measured with that peak detector. If your amp can’t do a test like this for at least 5 seconds without exploding or having the power supply go into hiccup mode it needs to be *junked* IMO.
 
IMO clipping behaviour is very important when comparing tubes to SS.

Tubes produce mostly 2nd order and remain listenable much further into clipping than SS.

SS amps must be generously proportioned so they will never get anywhere near clipping.
With tube amps you can sail much closer to the wind as it were before they become dangerous or unpleasant to listen to.

YMMV
 
I test my amplifiers power output using 30Hz sinewave drive. My largest will run 110WRMS @ 30Hz all day.

Well it s a *tube* amp, is it not? Mine will do 210 watts. Haven’t left it on all day like that, but one of them did run for an hour or so, with nothing overheating or any nasty looking glow inside the tubes. I call it good enough.

I did leave my “CS800 clone” on at full power into dummy loads for two days back when I developed it.

Low frequency output below 120 Hz tends to be limited by the main filter caps. The pole frequency between the cap and the load resistance needs to be about 2Hz in order to approach full power at 20 Hz. It’s easier to do this with tube amps because the load impedance is high and it doesn’t take a ridiculous number of microfarads.
 

Attachments

  • 9778AF2C-65E8-4E7A-A97C-C6B95B5B624C.jpeg
    9778AF2C-65E8-4E7A-A97C-C6B95B5B624C.jpeg
    92.9 KB · Views: 118
  • 404962BE-8944-4004-98A9-1D8CA5CD4FD7.jpeg
    404962BE-8944-4004-98A9-1D8CA5CD4FD7.jpeg
    409.6 KB · Views: 120
That means typically a 100W amplifier is twice as loud as a 10W amplifier, and a 10W amp is twice as loud as a 1W amplifier. This applies to tubes and transistors.

I was under the impression current thinking was moving toward 6 dB as double perceived loudness. Two speakers are 6dB louder than one for example. Are two perceived as twice as loud?
 
Charles Darwin,

Generalizations are just that . . . Generalizations.

The nature of different solid state amplifiers are not always similar.
Many have dominant 3rd harmonic distortion, both before clipping, and at clipping.
But not all respond that way.
Some solid stage amplifiers use totem pole output stages. Some use single ended output stages. Some use push pull outputs driving an output transformer, similar to a push pull tube amplifier.

The nature of different push pull tube amplifiers are not not aways similar.
Push pull amplifiers often have dominant 3rd harmonic distortion, both before clipping, and at clipping.
But not all respond that way.

The nature of different single ended tube amplifiers are not not aways similar.
Single ended amplifiers often have dominant 2nd harmonic distortion, both before clipping, and at clipping.
But not all respond that way.

What happens if the clipping occurs at the driver, or at the earlier stage, and not due to the output stage?

What happens if the clipping occurs at about the same level for both the driver and the output stage?

What happens to a single ended amplifier where the driver 2nd harmonic distortion is equal to the output stage 2nd harmonic distortion, and the two distortions cancel (serial cancellation)?

Before stating about the orders of harmonic distortion, and which is dominant, first consider the particular topology of the amplifier, and the implications thereof.
Or . . . just measure it, so you can be sure.
 
Last edited:
The ears have an automatic self adjusting sensitivity, versus the sound level.
Ear muscles adjust the ear's bone's position according to the sound level.
The varying bone's position changes the mechanical advantage as the bones transmit sound energy from the eardrum to the drum on the Cochlea.

In the literature (if I could find it again), 10dB more sound is perceived by the ear, as a doubling of sound level.

I do not see anything in the literature that talks about the percieved sound level, as related to feeling the sound on your body, legs, etc. There are no changes of mechanical advantage on those nerve sensors, so perhaps a 3 dB or 6dB increase of sound level might be perceived as a doubling or quadrupling of sound in terms of vibration.
 
150 watts would measure 34.6 volts RMS. Or 49 volts measured with that peak detector. If your amp can’t do a test like this for at least 5 seconds without exploding or having the power supply go into hiccup mode it needs to be *junked* IMO.

Wait. It sounds like you are saying that any amp that can't output 150 watts for at least 5 seconds is junk?

If this is true, then all I can say is there are a lot of truly excellent sounding pieces of junk on planet earth.
 
I never considered 0.03% to be anywhere within Miles of clipping . . .
unless there is an extremely unusual sharp transition from linear to non linear.

Your Mileage May Vary.

I have never owned an amplifier that was rated at 0.03% distortion (-70.5dBc total harmonic distortion), even at 1 Watt.
Neither 60 dB of negative feedback, Nor super-complex super-compensated circuitry that is somewhat similar to a really good chip OP amp, can ever be my cup of tea.
There may be other configurations that also give that kind of performance.
Performance aside, I do not want to spend that kind of money.

The original whiz-bang solid state amplifier from Audionics in Portland worked wonderfully into a power load resistor.
100% of them came back from the customers, they all blew up when loaded with a variety of models of loudspeakers.

Just my opinions.
 
Wait. It sounds like you are saying that any amp that can't output 150 watts for at least 5 seconds is junk?

If this is true, then all I can say is there are a lot of truly excellent sounding pieces of junk on planet earth.

No, an amp that can’t run at full signal sine wave for five seconds (at whatever power it clips at) is JUNK. Even home theater receivers can, usually. Some *really* cheap HT receivers don’t have enough SOA in the output transistors to run at full signal for even a couple seconds, and as such are walking time bombs. That makes them JUNK, since they will end up in a landfill because it’s only a matter of time till failure. A lot of cheap class D garbage will shut itself down, go into hiccup mode, cut waaaaay back on power, or otherwise misbehave when you ask for more than a few watts or tens of watts of average power even for a second. So-called “professional” units among them.
 
IMO clipping behaviour is very important when comparing tubes to SS.

Tubes produce mostly 2nd order and remain listenable much further into clipping than SS.

Charles, far too much of a generalization. Topology of the amp, and its execution are more imortant than tube vrs SS but the different transfer curves of the devices does tend to dictate the topologys most often used.

dave
 
I was under the impression current thinking was moving toward 6 dB as double perceived loudness. Two speakers are 6dB louder than one for example. Are two perceived as twice as loud?

10 dB is the recognized double as loud figure.

2 loudspeakers will produce 6dN mpre level, half from the doubleing of the speakers and half from the additional amplifier channel (or additional amplifer power if 2 speakers connected in parallel).

dave