Well does the speed of light always have to be the same?
I know there are lightfreezing or slowing down experiments takeing place....
I propose we rather accept what we call the speed of light is the limit of speed of linear information transfer.
I know there are lightfreezing or slowing down experiments takeing place....
I propose we rather accept what we call the speed of light is the limit of speed of linear information transfer.
No reflection on Bruno, just on the hilarity of finding secret patterns and anachronistic messages in it (or Nostradamus or whomever).
You might enjoy Martin Bernal. In fact, I'm sure you would. Try his two volume set, Black Athena.
Yes, it's fixed at 1 second per million microseconds.
And miraculously, one cycle per second works out exactly to one Hertz. Isn't Nature amazing?
And miraculously, one cycle per second works out exactly to one Hertz. Isn't Nature amazing?
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
Just over 95% is unknown?
I did not say the guy wrote the theory as is stands today, but anticipated, which is far from writng theory and completing mathematical aspects.
It is also foolish to discount the development of hypothesis, it tends to and can be the foundation of how a given idea or thought experiment begins in the world of physics, for example. Based on data, extrapolation, whatever. Pardon me if I am pointing out the obvious but unspoken by you. (a minor direct Sy comment)
There is also the bizzare aspect of science itself, whichs seems to think that everything that exists or may exist need or must be explained via mathematics. Over time, throughout history, this particular point of one sided analysis has proven to be the downfall of every single thing that has come before science.
Granted, science itself is only following the shape of itself that has come to be through the active life and history of it's creation, but that does not exclude it from the point that all that have come before in such endeavors, have either failed or fallen down to some degree. Times and the human mind change - social and cultural considerations of the moment-the herd aspect, whatever shape it may take within the given group or 'time'.
I'd like to say that human logic and capacity for observation to be hauled through reason and deduction - might prevail as an aspect, but history teaches us otherwise. Power and animalism slam the intelligent observer, as thought usually leads to a freedom of sorts. Thankfully that particular aspect (thinking and reason-however badly stated) is a cornerstone the record of human development and a component of the odd intelligent person who poessess the desire to share their particular point of illumination, whatever it may be, and we may have the odd bit of so-called 'progress'. The pendelum swings. Eg, For what it is worth, remember that truckloads of gold bullion were found in the basement of some recently demolsihed buildings, yet few seem to be aware of this. The pendelum swings to the negative side of the equation at this time, it seems.
With just over 95% of the universe being realtively unknown and a goodly part being completely sauced and black to our perception or capacity record or understand, it is, after any or the slightest bit of rational consideration and analysis, uterly foolish to turn the 'back of science' on a group of people who are trying to tell you what they know of the nature of those components..what they have known and understood...for thousands of years. Hence, people like the Dali Lama speaking with scientists physisists, etc, on the nature of reality and what buddhism understands about the subject.
In any given area of emergent understanding there are bound to be charlatans and even good hearted and meaning people who will be either slightly off, wrong or completely delusioned about what they think the understand or do understand in that given area of human expolration. Sharks will make their appearance as well. The story of alchemy is deep, millennia deep, ie over 10,000 years deep, if one bothers to do some looking. It encompases a potential correlation with some of the characteristics of dark matter, and also encompasess the aspect of human realization and knowledge of such as in how the buddhists state it.
Due to the concerns of how the mind works, how psychology and studies of the physical aspects of human mental construction and how perception etc, are all intertwined..... it has developed, over time, that knowledge and understadning of these things is not a common point of all mankind in the 'mass' - but one of individual passage and understanding. Knowledge of physics, rationality, deduction, mathematics, etc, are not components that can really help the individual in this particular case, but the deveolpment of the capacity to break and realize existence through the concious-unconcious barrier that exists within the very nature of the human mind.This then leds to the aspect of humane existence via the understanding of the very connectedness of all and the aspects of multidimensionality that are inherent within the understandings, but little understood by most of the people involved in such knowledge. Same as proponents of science can sometimes little understand the true depth and complexity of the subject, yet vehemently support and defend it, regardless of the pressures born down upon them.
So, if science is ignorant of 95% of the nature of the universe..who is to say that people who have been working on such for thousands of years..are wrong, because it comes from a direction that mathematical, literal and physically oriented science cannot seeminly pursue, due to the very nature of science and physic's design and execution....itself?
Like anything science and physics can be blinkered by the very avenues of exploration, hypothesis and system of proofs....themselves. For example..take western religion. Please.
A final point that should be utterly facinating for those who are paying attention:
What is the percentage that has been arrived at over time and analysis...of the level of the human mind that is conciously used by man, overall?
95%.
I return your attention to the caption written within the supplied image.
Spend a bit of time thinking about that. One more hint out of thousands.
whoops!
ie NOT used by man, the figure is 95% is unrealized by the conscious mind.
think of it as this:
Human (observer) = 'X'
Where X equals the realization of the universe.
What one can take away from that, is ..attempting to discern the nature of the universe without proper realization of the human, results in an impossible equation. Ie, it cannot exist, and simply won't.
Until or unless the observer rectifies their side of the equation, the reality or nature of the universe..to the act of observation, realization and record....simply will not unfold. Maybe, though, it eventually will...but people like the buddhists are here to tell you....
'Dude, you are doing it the hard way!'
And likely the path will remain brutally difficult until the given individal or mankind in totality (overall) goes back and understands the nature of the self, in all it's depth and complexity.
This is what I mean when I say that science is being 'hoisted by it's own petard' when it comes to these sciences and points of realization and understanding. As many a wise man has said, in many areas of endeavor:
'As Above...So Below'
ie NOT used by man, the figure is 95% is unrealized by the conscious mind.
think of it as this:
Human (observer) = 'X'
Where X equals the realization of the universe.
What one can take away from that, is ..attempting to discern the nature of the universe without proper realization of the human, results in an impossible equation. Ie, it cannot exist, and simply won't.
Until or unless the observer rectifies their side of the equation, the reality or nature of the universe..to the act of observation, realization and record....simply will not unfold. Maybe, though, it eventually will...but people like the buddhists are here to tell you....
'Dude, you are doing it the hard way!'
And likely the path will remain brutally difficult until the given individal or mankind in totality (overall) goes back and understands the nature of the self, in all it's depth and complexity.
This is what I mean when I say that science is being 'hoisted by it's own petard' when it comes to these sciences and points of realization and understanding. As many a wise man has said, in many areas of endeavor:
'As Above...So Below'
I know you are not religeous, but did you know gold is mentioned allready in genisis 2:12, even before the cretion of man's wife.
Strange that! Especialy seen in porportion to the whole creation story, and the scope of everything created....
Strange that! Especialy seen in porportion to the whole creation story, and the scope of everything created....
Has your foot swelled to the point that the door to the plane cannot close?
Thanks for the name, Sy. Looks interesting. I will investigate. Hopefully I can find a book of this nature on a shelf somewhere, so I don't have to buy first; I'd like to peruse before dumping the cash into it. If I do so.
Has anyone looked at this one? I bought it and am slogging through it. It qualifies as a 'pig' when it comes to books. Some reviewers have even stated it as being 'the most important book written in the past 200 years'. Who knows, really. "Out Standing in his Field", as they say.
The Temple of Man
Thanks for the name, Sy. Looks interesting. I will investigate. Hopefully I can find a book of this nature on a shelf somewhere, so I don't have to buy first; I'd like to peruse before dumping the cash into it. If I do so.
Has anyone looked at this one? I bought it and am slogging through it. It qualifies as a 'pig' when it comes to books. Some reviewers have even stated it as being 'the most important book written in the past 200 years'. Who knows, really. "Out Standing in his Field", as they say.
The Temple of Man
Nordic said:
Nope. I'd have to go and own one of those things, and I'm not a huge fan, after being kicked out of the organization for daring to think for myself, and questioning the logic..at the age of 8-1/2 years. I read it twice then, and then spent the rest of my time there looking aghast and in wonderment at the crew who uhm, er....worshipped. It was..weird. Bad scripting on that movie. It gave me the creeps. Wrong pew!