zygibajt said:the couse was a speaker cable (quite expensive one,figh capacity-about 1nF per meter).
Bartek
whoever designed that kind of cable has zero understanding of audio and should PAY $$$$$$ for others to use the cable.
This further solidifies my view that the "cable" thing is just rip-off.
Cable
Thanks a lot for answers.
To be honest that's the very first amp it behaves that way with that cable (Alephs for example work great) and I like that cable a lot,couse it sounds wonderful,and that is why it bothered me (Instead of my favorite one I had to use some ordinary Cordial speaker cable).
Thanks a lot for answers.
To be honest that's the very first amp it behaves that way with that cable (Alephs for example work great) and I like that cable a lot,couse it sounds wonderful,and that is why it bothered me (Instead of my favorite one I had to use some ordinary Cordial speaker cable).
I was just playing with my new toy (a Tektronix 2232 scope 🙂) and my gainclone.
I looked at the supply voltages:
in DC mode, I saw a nice flat line, 25V DC
In AC mode, with a little more sensitivity, I saw something like a sawtooth
100Hz (normal) 0.4V p-p
I found this very high, but after easy maths:
(F*V)*S=A
with 1000uF, 0.4V and 0.01s, I got 0.04A (40mA)
This is at idle, quite normal.
Have other people looked with theyr scope on the supply rails?
I looked at the supply voltages:
in DC mode, I saw a nice flat line, 25V DC
In AC mode, with a little more sensitivity, I saw something like a sawtooth
100Hz (normal) 0.4V p-p
I found this very high, but after easy maths:
(F*V)*S=A
with 1000uF, 0.4V and 0.01s, I got 0.04A (40mA)
This is at idle, quite normal.
Have other people looked with theyr scope on the supply rails?
Bricolo said:
Have other people looked with their scope on the supply rails?
yes, I was given a scope a while back - really helpful
did you look at the ac on the secondary ? according to the theory, and on a simulator, there is HF ringing just after the diodes switch off.
In real life I have yet to see this. I would be interested to hear what you see if you feel like having a look.
wether you see anything or not I think you will probably notice a big improvement in the sound if you put a 4.7uF cap directly across the secondary. which suggests that there is something going wether it can be seen as a voltage or not. perhaps trying to have a look at the current would be more revealing.
cheers
mike
No, I looked after the diode bridge, at the supply rail themselves.
I'll have a look at the secondaries, please do the same on the supply rails. This way we will each compare our results 😉
I'll have a look at the secondaries, please do the same on the supply rails. This way we will each compare our results 😉
Stupid question:
how did you look directly at the secondaries with your scope?
My scope is connected to earth, and I think that it's the same earth that is on my probes. So how can I connect my scope to the secondaries, as none of the 2 wires of the secondaries is connected to earth?
how did you look directly at the secondaries with your scope?
My scope is connected to earth, and I think that it's the same earth that is on my probes. So how can I connect my scope to the secondaries, as none of the 2 wires of the secondaries is connected to earth?
Bricolo said:Stupid question:
how did you look directly at the secondaries with your scope?
My scope is connected to earth, and I think that it's the same earth that is on my probes. So how can I connect my scope to the secondaries, as none of the 2 wires of the secondaries is connected to earth?
well, the secondary windings should be completely isolated as long as nothing is connected to earth in your gainclone.
If this is the case, and you can check this with your multimeter ohm range with the cct TURNED OFF, then you can ground one end of the secondary with the probe earth and measure the other.
my mate at work says measure twice cut once...in this case it's good to check twice measure once !
mike
Sorry, but you're wrong.
The "middle point" between the 2 diodes briges is my star ground, and is earthed.
The "middle point" between the 2 diodes briges is my star ground, and is earthed.
Bricolo said:Sorry, but you're wrong.
The "middle point" between the 2 diodes briges is my star ground, and is earthed.
OK, that's fine, there are two ways around this. You could either temporarily disconnect this earth so the the amp is floating with respect to earth and proceed as discussed before or if you have two i/p on the scope connect both the i/p earths to the star ground of the amp and connect the probes to either side of the secondary. if you 'sum' the two channels. You should be able to see what is going on. Without setting it up my here I can't recall if you need to to pase invert one channel or not, but it only takes the flick of a switch to find out.
alternatively you could just try the cap across the secondary and see if you like the effect
at present my clone is supplied by batteries so I can't do a meaningful comparison
cheers
mike
I'm too lazo to switch my soldering iron on 😉
Disconnecting the scope from earth is also a solution, and an easier one.
I just have to plus it on a wall wart that has no earth
Just tell me if I'm wrong and that this is a bad idea
Disconnecting the scope from earth is also a solution, and an easier one.
I just have to plus it on a wall wart that has no earth
Just tell me if I'm wrong and that this is a bad idea
I've looked at the secondaries: a nice sinusoid 🙂
No HF garbage (except a mV or so, don't even know if it's really on the secondaries, or if it comes from my probes)
No HF garbage (except a mV or so, don't even know if it's really on the secondaries, or if it comes from my probes)
Bricolo said:I've looked at the secondaries: a nice sinusoid 🙂
No HF garbage (except a mV or so, don't even know if it's really on the secondaries, or if it comes from my probes)
That sounds more or less what I have measured, I think that most of the theoreticl ringing must be inhibited by winding capacitance.
I hope that your observation of a clean waveform does not put you off the idea of trying the cap...😉
mike
I'll try the cap 😉
Have you looked at your secondaries?
How does the AC look?
If I find the manual for my tektronix 2232, I'll try to get data with the comouter and post some graphs
Have you looked at your secondaries?
How does the AC look?
If I find the manual for my tektronix 2232, I'll try to get data with the comouter and post some graphs
Bricolo said:I'll try the cap 😉
Have you looked at your secondaries?
How does the AC look?
If I find the manual for my tektronix 2232, I'll try to get data with the comouter and post some graphs
only on my class A amps. on those the sinewave has a flattened top because of the high current, just after this they may be a hint a wiggle, not much.
I will try to measure current on the scope sometime
cheers
mike
I did a mistake
I wrote secondaries instead of supply rails.
Did you look at your gainclone's supply rails with the scope?
just tell me if (in AC mode) you also have a kind of sawtooth, and what is it's amplitude peak to peak
I wrote secondaries instead of supply rails.
Did you look at your gainclone's supply rails with the scope?
just tell me if (in AC mode) you also have a kind of sawtooth, and what is it's amplitude peak to peak
Bricolo said:I did a mistake
I wrote secondaries instead of supply rails.
Did you look at your gainclone's supply rails with the scope?
just tell me if (in AC mode) you also have a kind of sawtooth, and what is it's amplitude peak to peak
I'm sorry I can't do that at present. my current chipamp runs off batteries. I'm in the process of building the very best chipamp thay I can manage. On this I will try batteries & mains.
However the sawtooth that you've measured sounds completely typical & normal for the kind of current that you are drawing
mike
Peter Daniel said:Few people asked me about it already. I bought them locally at Active Surplus. They've been there for months and I didn't really know how to use them. It's after building my first gainclone I figured they might be perfect size for that amp. So I went there and bought all of them (about 12 pcs.). There are still few left, but they are slightly damaged on the fins.
MPJA.com has the same heat pipes. Be aware that the way these are mounted inthe picture SEVERELY limit the effectiveness of heat pipes. Because they use fluid convection, they must be mounted vertically to do any real good as heatpipes. They may still work as conventional heatsinks, though.
They work alright, and are only slightly warm when pushed. Also the temperature is uniform along the whole length of a heatsink assembly. I would also expect that in horizontal position, the heat dissipation is much better from inbetween the fins.
Hmm are these not SPARC-type processor sinks? I believe they were designed for horizontal use. At any rate they are quite sufficient to the task.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Chip Amps
- This is not just another gainclone