This is not just another gainclone

Status
Not open for further replies.
Beryllium Oxide is one of the most dangerous materials used in electronic components. Only when used safely the risks are acceptable in the eyes of some countries. It may come as no surprise that these are the same countries that dump their chemical waste in the 3rd world for some money.

Ok, but what if one buys a Gainclone from you and has it repaired after some years ? The one who repairs it can slip with his screwdriver and then...

This kind of discussion we had before about asbestos. There still are a lot of countries that think the risks are acceptable.
My parents had a friend that drew technical drawings ar a shipswarf. He died of asbestose and never even worked with the stuff. He just walked to his office everyday and passed the workshop.

IMO opinion all these materials should be banned because there are too high risks involved if people don't know what they are working with. There is not a sign on it that says it has Beryllium in it does it ? You know how careless people can be.
 
At the risk of repeating, here is some of the info found at:

http://www.hostboard.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=3729&t=114

Beryllium's dangers

"Beryllium is a gray metal lighter than aluminum but stiffer than steel. It is used to make other metals stronger and more resistant to bending. It makes golf clubs harder, bicycle frames lighter and nuclear weapons more powerful.

"The metal is so toxic that in 1949 the government adopted a maximum exposure limit of 2 micrograms per cubic meter of air over eight hours. That is the equivalent of pulverizing a beryllium marble and dispersing it into the air six feet high over one square mile.

"Last year (1999), the Department of Energy concluded that the standard should be only one-tenth that amount. But there was no standard at all in the early 1940's, when beryllium became an element vital to the nation's nuclear weapons program. And it was used in Kansas City from the time the plant began making nuclear weapons components in 1949.

"The greatest danger comes from breathing beryllium dust. So those most at risk are the craftsmen who drilled, ground and shaped beryllium-copper alloys into the parts that make warheads work. The metal included about 2 percent beryllium to add strength to the copper.

"But other workers -- including hundreds of people who tested, inspected or processed beryllium copper alloys at the Kansas City plant -- could have been exposed, Energy Department officials said.

"Because people react differently to beryllium, even incidental exposure to the metal's dust can trigger the disease in some people.

"At other weapons plants, some secretaries, security guards and others who never handled beryllium were diagnosed with CBD. Even some women whose only contact with the dust was through handling their husbands' dirty work clothes came down with the disease.

"CBD is particularly insidious because it often does not show up for 10 to 30 years after exposure, government researchers said. That means even people who originally test negative to beryllium sensitivity can become sensitive years after the last exposure.

'Some people develop the sensitivity within months of exposure,'(I got sick immediately - TWW) Cragle said. 'Others won't show sensitivity for more than 20 years. ... We have no idea how long after sensitivity that a person will develop CBD. Those data are just now being gathered.'
 
... I know how careless i was when i was 12-16. I unsoldered my parts from dozens of old TVs and radios. And the greatest you can get in this situation is old computer stuff from university labs etc. I don´t know how much toxic stuff i inhalated that days...
 
I quote Aavid Thermalloy again:
>Beryllium oxide is chemically inert and completely safe to use in its fired state. Handling of finished parts presents absolutely no health hazards.
Beryllium oxide,however, is toxic when dust, mist or fumes containing particles small enough to enter the lungs are inhaled.<

I tried to grind beryllium oxide washer, and there was absolutely no dust produced. The material is ceramic like, it got red hot, but I couldn't shave off any material. The same goes for trying to scratch it with a screwdriver. Anyway, it is always covered with thermal paste, so how anybody can inhale the particles?
 
The risk itself should be enough to refrain from using it. You only need 1 or 2 microgram in your lungs to die. It will oxidise in your lungs and then the toxidity is at its best. ( or worst actually ).

That's why it is forbidden for a long time now in Europe.

BTW I don't know Aavid Thermaloy but is there a chance they are the ones that produce the poison ?
 
Maybe there will be a ban on cigarettes. Maybe we will have that same stupid thing like in the USA that it is forbidden to smoke outside in some cities.

...But since I smoke myself I can tell that I choose to smoke and I am very well aware what risks are involved.

I think the Beryllium thing is something else. Probably most people that became ill from BeO only learnt the risks afterwards. They did not have an opportunity to choose...

Please don't advise people to use this stuff or to recommend it.
Alu Oxide, Mica or even silicone sheets are really good enough for a DIY amp. We're not building space gear here. That 0.1 degree difference that it makes, we will survive that.

Recommending it will create demand and production will continue.
No demand means no production and more research for environmental acceptable materials.
 
yea, coming back to diy audio

I wonder if this can effect the sound of your system?


Hmm. I don´t want to criticize with the following statement. I´m not able to hear differences in different power cords, caps, resistors.

I´m able to hear difference between different speakers and listen room situations. (door window open or closed, where speakers are placed etc)

I don´t belive the device makes a differnce - not with the SE class A amps. 2 amperes DC are 2 amperes DC - no matter what kind and how many cables and transformers between power station and amp.

If i want to make tests on this my experience until now says i need to complete the new speakers - see my forgotten horn thread - Nelson needs to publish the active XO , so i could biamp, best if i complete the ax for the TL1601a, and i need my new listening room under the roof, 2 years of work.

If there is a difference maybe i will dicover then. I will make a 3*230V 2,5mm^2 Cu cable to the new listening room - so i´m able to make 3 phase power supplys for the next generation of amps.
 
All my European customers please stay assured that I'm not using any toxic susbstances in my amps.😉
 

Attachments

  • al.jpg
    al.jpg
    49.2 KB · Views: 1,425
Peter Daniel said:


I wonder if this can effect the sound of your system?😉

/QUOTE]

Yes, unfortunately these RCDs all do, and very little is ever made of it in the audio press etc. They are ruinous to the sound as (almost all of them) have a very fine wire in series with the live and neutral mains wires, each wound around a ferrite type of choke to act as the current sensing element. There is only one make available in the UK (as far as I know) which has more robust windings, but this is still pretty lousy to 'listen' through, presumably (at a guess) also due to the chokes effect.

I avoid the problem but retain the safety aspect throughout the rest of the house by having a dedicated mains supply to the listening room, which has the additional advantage of using specialist mains audio cables which dump RF quite effectively.

The result compared with the 'old' RCD type arrangement is very much improved sound, and absolutely no clicks or pops etc., ever, so for those who really care about high-end sound, there is no choice IMHO.

Regards,
 
Yes, unfortunately these RCDs all do

This statement can´t be true in every case. Different amplifiers work in very different ways. It may be the device has influence on some amplifier types. But if so, there will be a difference of this influence if different amplifier topologies are used.

btw, i don´t belive anyone can hear. This can change at the moment i hear it, but not earlyer. And : i belive the influence of the type of glass used on the window of the listening room is more important. (no joke)
 
Regarding the 'Class A' mods. I removed my 1.5 K resistor to hear the difference again. I do not really know what's better. With resistor the sound is warmer and without the sound is more lively...
(always those choices...)

Echo echo...

Hi,

After posting this mod a while back I have been busy working on the amp and a current source is much better then the resistor - period. The resistor is a bit lumpy and contrained. I still prefer a resistor to no class A mod but we can do better.

At the moment I use a constant current diode with a decent 1K resistor. I like it.

Also try an 8K resistor instead of a 1.5K I found it sounds a bit better. It pulls less current but I think what is important here is not the amount of current but the fact that the output is switched on at all times. The higher impedance of the 8K resistor makes it sound better - it can't compete with a good current source but its worth trying to see if you like this mod or not before going down this road.

Cheers,
Anthony
 
awesome

Man, this thread has an awesome quantity/ quality and diversity of information!
I was colecting idata on GC paciently over a year and now in a matter of days, this information is condensed here from theory of inverting gizmos to insolator and heat radiation.
I think the only data I still need is a not very expensive brand of caps to use betwwen the GC and the fragile mid horns and tweeters I use. It was suggested the audiocap. Anyone can provide a source in the US market for this? Or any substitution?
Cheers

Ric--amazed
 
Status
Not open for further replies.