That's why I was behind the turntables.
Yah, I can't seem to get the courage to get rid of my big singles.
Nowhere to run. Lookin down the barrel of the Devil's gun.
jn
Cool.
I used a pair of technics SL 51's (I think that was the model number.) They were rock solid torque wise when I stopped the vinyl during spot mixing, and didn't lock synchronously like the SL 1200's mark 1, but gently slowed or speeded up without springing back.
Had a local vendor who could mod the 1200's to break that solid lock without losing torque, but I didn't need it.
jn
A friend desperately wanted a 501 sound for his sons disco . He was one of the JVC people who got Mobile Fidelity in Alabama started so knew a good sound ( Paul Stewart of JVC UK ) . Paul said find me the scruffiest 401's you can with good mechanicals . I had some real dogs and did just that . Apparently these decks caused astonishment in North London for their dynamics . Not bad seeing Technics 1210 is excellent on that . Paul tells me Lockwood audio are back in business , some will know that is great news . Lockwood Tannoys etc .
I have always speculated that heavy elements are not created in Super Nova . Or Super Nova are in fact dying black holes . There are big and little black holes . I suspect boundary conditions dictate that . I got this idea from super conductors . They are zero ohms , however they have limits of current they can carry . That is a strange paradox . Not really when seeing how they work . I wondered if black holes were the same and like Mr Creosote of Monty Python they can not eat any more ? Most people are religious skeptics , me also a science skeptic at times .
Black hole stabilize galaxies ? Seems very likely . When did the first black hole emerge ? Are some heavy elements the result of many ingestion's ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v29QfOyuZ3Y
Black hole stabilize galaxies ? Seems very likely . When did the first black hole emerge ? Are some heavy elements the result of many ingestion's ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v29QfOyuZ3Y
If S. Hawking is correct..
The first black hole was before everything ..time 0..before the big bang..(so to speak)...The unstable nothing...
The ultimate black hole...before everything...
Regards
M. Gregg
Exactly . I asked Dr H what hi fi he has and asked him to finish the work of Michael Gerzon . Bet the carers never showed him it ? Thought it right up his street . My friend Hubert said when I was concerned about Michael that he had discovered things beyond Higgs and it would not let him sleep ( the proofs ) . As far as I can tell he gave it up . Perhaps he thought it would be the end if we had such power ? Michael Gerzon is known as Oxfords unknown Hawking . I knew Michael . Like me he diverted into his hobby .
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Gerzon
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiomatic_quantum_field_theory
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Gerzon
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiomatic_quantum_field_theory
Last edited:
However,
does it need a black hole at the centre of a universe to keep it stable?
If so what would be at the centre of a multiverse?
Then again it can't have a centre can it...
Regards
M. Gregg
That needs answering . On a crude level the black hole becomes an axle . Without it nothing . Let there be light is a very curious statement . Before energy arranged itself to the atomic level I suspect there was no light . I have often wondered if Hawking just proved Genesis ? I have often said the first two pages interest me , the rest is about a tribe . My Rabi says that days is mistranslation and is era's ( 6 era's ) . When missionaries went to Africa it is said that African tribes already knew this story . I suspect the Jews took it from a time far before their tribe existed ? Perhaps a missionary 30 000 years ago did a similar job and caused much confusion . I always thought Hawking got his idea from Genesis . Fred Hoyle might not be wrong you know . Indications are that he was .
The problem is,
The human mind has a problem with the idea of "No end" and "no start".
You have to assume that the start was posssibly the end of something else..creation of the "nothing"..(the big problem is the idea of a thought being nothing)
Talking scifi for a moment..if there was a multiverse..would all universes end at the same time..or are we looking at a superverse with multiverses inside it..
Even the problem with a black hole is the compression of matter to one area..within this universe...ie a start point..this cannot be if the universe is infinate..it would have to be infinite multiple black holes..???
Regards
M. Gregg
The human mind has a problem with the idea of "No end" and "no start".
You have to assume that the start was posssibly the end of something else..creation of the "nothing"..(the big problem is the idea of a thought being nothing)
Talking scifi for a moment..if there was a multiverse..would all universes end at the same time..or are we looking at a superverse with multiverses inside it..
Even the problem with a black hole is the compression of matter to one area..within this universe...ie a start point..this cannot be if the universe is infinate..it would have to be infinite multiple black holes..???
Regards
M. Gregg
I'm only guessing here..
However I thought the idea is that light can only travel in...so there is light in a black hole...the problem is that time is supposed to stop..so as it travels in it speeds up...ie a change..unless the light still travels constant but once in thats it...that would say that the gravity would not effect it, just divert it..however if time stops relative to outside I assume the speed should change? Density etc? If it dosen't then how can time change for light?
So inside a black hole it should be very very bright? All light is pulled in..
Regards
M. Gregg
I think we get confused between black holes and Alpha and Omega . I suspect we emerged from a black hole is a simplification . We emerged form something similar to a black hole . Multiverse same time references ? Most likely yes .
I find finite ideas difficult . The classic example was when someone said to me when very young . Imagine a wall in space that says the end . What is the other side of the wall ? I also say infinity hasn't happened yet . Finite is far more complicated . One of my friends said infinity is only a mathematical concept that makes some equations work better . I liked that . He said we should not image it has a life outside of mathematics . The finite is the reality as the alternative has not happened and NEVER will ( discuss ) .
You need to imagine that you are in the black hole i.e beyond the event horizon (relatively speaking 😉 ) as opposed to observing the black hole from a distance
My understanding is it's not the speed of light that changes. it's the frequency. To a distant observer a light source will appear to red shift i.e it's frequency reduces as it approaches the observable event horizon (due to the relative time space distortion) as it moves though the event horizon the frequency of the light appears to become zero relative to a distant observer
Last edited:
- Status
- Not open for further replies.