it all helps! 💚
some numbers stand out to me as a result of some experiences in the United States Naval Nuckear power program. Not that they would normally but this wasn’t a normal investment on a normal boat we had issues like no others since the Cuban missile crisis or even World War II.
The same time the comet crashed into Jupiter (Shoemaker-Levy), we lost our towed away antenna submerging from the polar ice cap we are just broken through.
For over 24 hours we had nothing as the capstand was jammed, and that hasn’t happened since the Cuban missile crisis.
later we will experience flooding like no one has since unfortunate Russian navy most recently. Subsequently several individuals including the executive officer transferred or got out of the Navy all together.
The boat with later collide with the USS San Francisco.. More things very awkward but numbers would stand out because of these types of things including uranium 238 to 235/92/143.
or krypton and xenon136-138/86-88 helium 4and hydrogen1…
Fission products and leftovers. 20 years later I ran into transmission loudspeakers for I don’t know what reason I suddenly bumped into more numbers that look familiar for whatever reason…
(13.5-14)
13.5-13824)hz from 0.0625-6.4m, The same discrepancy as seen in 1 /254 if you leave off the decimals and divide back into it.
(1/254)/2.54 shows 15.5000003100006200012400002480000
2.48 is thecaverage logarithmic energy decrement per collision of nuetron in uranium 235 fuel mix.
(1/254/4
As:0.98425/1016.
3048/.032808
1.609344/0.6213711…
360/.2777777778
729/137174211248
1/137 as 07299270729927….
One just requires a little bit more detail with the same number that has more information attached to it which means something else or is directing you some words like a verb.
11/2.54 is
4.33(070) 11
8.66(14) 22
1.732(28) 44
3.464(56) 88
6.2929(112)* 176
13824(224)* 352
27648(448)*704
1408
2816
5632
and
(11264/7) is the conversion from meter to mile) it’s 1609.142857, (1.609344) saying the same thing that happened to
402.2857143(2816/7)
100.57142(704/7) 25.142857 which is 176÷7, 44/7 x4 and (1/4 44/7 is 11/7) and 2.75/7.
2.75/7 as 2.75/2.54 108 hz(and More information.)
It’s a wild goose chase but it does work out it’s not ******** because it leads you places that are more real information you just have to figure out where and what to say in these decimal points that nobody looks at it all of these very important numbers.
We are so arrogant to think that somehow our number system or our understanding in pitifully small dimensions is going to reveal anything so easy to see as the golden ratio would portray it just like Fibonacci it was simple numbers instead.
It is it it’s the mathematical functions that must be used and expressed in these other ways makes a mark and you’re supposed to notice and go see what that actually is
In this case it all has to do with Wavefunction no matter what entire universe or wherever 144In this case it all has to do with Wavefunction no matter what entire universe or wherever
We can change this all to distances or frequencies or circles or phase angles I described him in anyway we want to starting with the simple base is that the speed of light is the number three but slightly altereWe can change this all to distances or frequencies or circles or phase angles I described him in anyway we want to starting with the simple base is that the speed of light is the number three but slightly less, pi is just less than 1/7 and 3x(7/7). And all together this matters just like 365.25 whatever is 360 and that number is changing and always has.
there were 21 hours 66 million years ago approximately why was that it was also great deal more oxygen ppm on the earth. Was that a more luminescent sun a smaller sun a faster moving earth or a combination of things?
Physics altered because of this? The numbers are the same then as they are right now because right now the sun is not exactly pi but it’s awfully close. You can use the speed of light times 12 to be slightly under 360.
and 2.54 is slightly more than 2.539955… and sometime around 1954 became 2.54. And while people want to get rid of the metric system then you miss out on all these numbers and connections to the inch etc. etc.
already happened horribly because look at how hard we have to search these numbers to find these connections already.
But clearly a large chunk of this is available right now if you hop on a plane with me and we take a laser level and a framing square and a couple of tape measures /calculator and jump into the Egyptian pyramid, and into the kings chamber.
we think we’re smart we think we are no more than ever.. if you look at the cycles in the archaeological record you’ll notice everything you need to know about the ice age or global warming. Dig even deeper you’ll notice that a meteor or asteroid is overdue. But it actually isn’t it’s just the level of the event by size that matters in 1908 amongst quite a few others the cycle has never been broken.
Whether or not you look into that is The government may find is an issue or the Vatican Catholicchurch. Things that we’re not able to see or are privy to since we’re not in the church or the government we’re just citizens and have been for thousands of years in that same scenario(not To start a political discussion or anything like that, saying our educational system and everything about our knowledge needs to be considered as inadequate or intentionally left to only serve one purpose that is to produce tax revenue and be part of a system that shoves little people to education system that falls very short on allowing anyone who’s actually smart or creative to actually be those things usually).
Side the box thinking isn’t even the beginning what’s real or what can be real conventional math is quickly fall short of many things and has erroneous numbers all over the place in unit conversions as well
back to the bare bones don’t overthink it how they had to figure it out is how it still is a Compass a straight edge and a metric and standard ruler are perfect isometric graph paper instead of graph paper if you want to cheat but most of all circles that have both metric and standard units are key – if only paper could get so huge is to cover what needs to be covered it’s not that big of a deal however it seems to be a lot bigger than the 17 x 24 or so that you can buy🤪
There’s no need to nickel and dime it to such extremes or to point out such things that are borderline connected or even fair to say honestly.
So that said I’m only using what I can find in horn response and what I can build and how I can arrange that as rectangles in order to do so and nothing more. Sound is great when you’re sticking it into itself already and only time of flight between pulled her outfits to keep it in check or completely create a disaster that conveniently horn response red flag is huge within .002 cm you know
So that said I’m only using what I can find in horn response and what I can build and how I can arrange that as rectangles in order to do so and nothing more. Sound is great when you’re sticking it into itself already and only time of flight between pulled her outfits to keep it in check or completely create a disaster that conveniently horn response red flag is huge within .002 cm you know
~45 years old
Jack of all trades master of absolutely nothing.
‘ Degrees’ in nuclear power, in the nursing field and AWS welding and informal offroad vehicle suspension fabrication.
Every piece of paper it was a diploma etc. landed in the trash except for AWS welding papers cause I had to have thosEvery piece of paper it was a diploma etc. landed in the trash except for AWS welding papers . Those are Needed, Rest are arguably a joke as there’s any thing at this point we all have a bachelors in science at the very least in her hand as long as we’re holding a cell phonRest are arguably a joke as there’s any thing at this point we all have a bachelors in science at the very least in her hand as long as we’re holding asmart phone. Educational system is quickly becoming obsolete. Informatin is all that’s needed, People who can see patterns and deeper into that or further out are going to be the ones that are considered smart.
you definitely might be onto Something with your information theory??
Not very successful in school(stuck in gate and AP classes without a choice by parents) But when that was over things changed…
No offence intended Mr. Weldz, it's just that the human brain is a pretty good pattern-matching machine, and spots patterns (especially visual ones) readily. You may have discovered a unifying 'code' for the universe and mankind's creations, but more likely not. If it gives you pleasure finding patterns then crack on - I'm not here to spoil your fun, and hope that it leads to useful advances in whatever fields you study. Perhaps it would be useful to us to cite a real-world example of how your number-crunching has improved some audio device or other.
I have a book on tensors and vector spaces, one page stick out. It is literally a page of integration symbols making it look horrifically complex.
The reality is that it's language being used makes it looks complex. In reality, the geometry is simple and expressed in a different language form the calculation is simpler and ideas can be deduced faster from it.
A good example of this in "real life" is Feynman diagrams. The same pictorial concept is being applied to quantum reasoning by Bob Coecke and Alex Kissinger and it won't be the last time a different language will appear.
I would expect the same is true for FFT and audio.
The reality is that it's language being used makes it looks complex. In reality, the geometry is simple and expressed in a different language form the calculation is simpler and ideas can be deduced faster from it.
A good example of this in "real life" is Feynman diagrams. The same pictorial concept is being applied to quantum reasoning by Bob Coecke and Alex Kissinger and it won't be the last time a different language will appear.
I would expect the same is true for FFT and audio.
I knew a person (both of us were in a hospital, so I could follow what he were doing), who all day calculated the perfect tooth gear. He did it in head, and entered his results in an exercise book by pencil. He did not disclose any details, because his biggest fear was that someone would steal his intellectual property.
How is it related to this thread? I don't know, it just came to my mind.
How is it related to this thread? I don't know, it just came to my mind.
keep them coming sir, That is the diagonal if measured from the ceiling to floor on either short end of the kings chamber in the inside of the great pyramid @ giza. That would be the entrance or the opposite end where the ark of the covenant(gone) was and it’s solid granite rectangle container still resides…Corner chipped off
Attachments
keep them coming sir, That is the diagonal if measured from the ceiling to floor on either short end of the kings chamber in the inside of the Egyptian khufu pyramid @ giza. That would be the entrance or the opposite end where the ark of the covenant(gone) and it’s solid granite rectangle container still resides…Corner chipped off
I was sharing this Periodically with measured impedance and simulated simultaneously and sifting through tones and generated signals in RTA. Then intentionally offsetting things to create awkward to see what would be detected by datsv3
Attachments
********.
That is a Mathematical Function which applies anywhere meeting that geometry; pyramid (the building, (not the geometrical shape) or not, Giza or anywhere else.
Entrances, ark of covenant granite, containers or chipped ends are irrelevant. just unrelated cr*p.
Not sure whether we are dealing with a mental case or a boring troll, trying to pull our collective legs.
Probably half ´n half.
Last edited by a moderator:
How do you tell a Mathematician from an Engineer?
I call the root of -1 j!
Mathematicians call it i.
But excellent Lecture.
I call the root of -1 j!
Mathematicians call it i.
But excellent Lecture.
really?
One reference to a pyramid and you already sh!t the bed? You might want to Skedaddle because there’s plenty more of that… you might want to check the other measurements that go along with that before you open your mouth? it doesn’t have to be so hard relax…
Attachments
Last edited:
Things im
Not familiar with or havent looked at:
pythagorean comma?
Music notes/ratios?
The odd harmonics: 0.217,0.349,0.424, 0.6, 0.712, 0.848….
Bass reflex?
I am unable to express (Decaying or Growing) exponential "e" in terms of circular "Pi"... (in which it all comes round again.) 🙁
Best I have got to is the extremely interesting number 163:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heegner_number
Related to the j-invariant and the Taxicab (1729) number -1:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J-invariant
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxicab_number
I only got a "B" in mAthematics. My weakness.
Best I have got to is the extremely interesting number 163:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heegner_number
Related to the j-invariant and the Taxicab (1729) number -1:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J-invariant
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxicab_number
I only got a "B" in mAthematics. My weakness.
Last edited:
Code:
e^(pi.i) + 1 = 0 ........ (given from above)
Expanding e^(pi.i):
e^(pi.i) = 1 + (pi.i)/1! + (pi.i)^2/2! + (pi.i)^3/3! + (pi.i)^4/4! + (pi.i)^5/5 + .....
e^(pi.i) = 1 + i.pi/1! - (pi)^2/2! - i.(pi)^3/3! + (pi)^4/4! + i.(pi)^5/5 + .....
e^(pi.i) = i{pi/1! - (pi)^3/3! + (pi)^5/5! + ....} + {1 - (pi)^2/2 + (pi)^4/4! - .....}
The curly braketed expressions are the standard
expansions for sine and cosine:
Therefore:
e^(pi.i) = cos (pi) + i.sin (pi)
e^(pi.i) = -1 + i.0
Substituting in the initial equation, we get:
e^(pi.i) + 1 = 0 ..... (Original equation)
-1 + i.0 + 1 = 0
That is: -1 + 1 = 0
This tells nothing new.One possible way of obtaining the value of Pi analytically (algebraically) is to find the expansion defining arcsine or arccosine. This can be done using the Maclauren Series given below:
Then, when the function is derived, the value of arcsin(1) is evaluated using the derived function. arcsin(1) should evaluate to pi/2.
Code:
f(x)=f(0)+f^'(0)x+(f^('')(0))/(2!)x^2+(f^((3))(0))/(3!)x^3+...+(f^((n))(0))/(n!)x^n+....Then, when the function is derived, the value of arcsin(1) is evaluated using the derived function. arcsin(1) should evaluate to pi/2.
You've certainly got me thinking here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_series
But surely it is a MacLaurin series? Spelling is important in the very precise discipline of Mathematics.
It's got me pondering the Dirichlet Eta Function:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirichlet_eta_function
I am looking at Infinite Series in an entirely new way. Surely left and right handedness may play a part? 😀
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_series
But surely it is a MacLaurin series? Spelling is important in the very precise discipline of Mathematics.
It's got me pondering the Dirichlet Eta Function:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirichlet_eta_function
I am looking at Infinite Series in an entirely new way. Surely left and right handedness may play a part? 😀