andRookie said:As you might be able to read Norwegian this project may be interesting.
I just looked at the pictures! I'm a little uneasy about global feedback around so many stages of AC coupling, but driving the output valves directly from cathode followers is definitely worthwhile.
Hi everyone,
I'm new in this neck of the woods, so first of hello!
I am looking at another project altogether but have found somewhere in my travels that might be of interest, it is in German but it is pretty easy to follow. www.welter-electronic.de
and also
www.thel.de
They have lots of kits and the iron is relatively inexpensive. They have alot of experience and get good reviews on the German fora apparently.
Cheers Stroop
I'm new in this neck of the woods, so first of hello!
I am looking at another project altogether but have found somewhere in my travels that might be of interest, it is in German but it is pretty easy to follow. www.welter-electronic.de
and also
www.thel.de
They have lots of kits and the iron is relatively inexpensive. They have alot of experience and get good reviews on the German fora apparently.
Cheers Stroop
EC8010 said:I just looked at the pictures! I'm a little uneasy about global feedback around so many stages of AC coupling, but driving the output valves directly from cathode followers is definitely worthwhile.
I ended up with a mix of local and global feedback in that amplifier. About 10dB local feedback (from the plates of the output tubes back to the drivers) and ~14dB gNFB. This gave me the best sonic and technical results (frequency response, distortion, Zo, etc).
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
http://www.veiset.net/valhalla/04MAR2006.html
Jan E Veiset
I'm putting my money on this, half a fortune in transformers though....
http://www.audiodesignguide.com/my/pp3.html
Simple design, 20W class-A, HT increase to 400-450 for <40W power, but drops out of class-A.
To get more power than KT88, 6550, EL34, 300B... will do in P-P is a pain in the ***....
So paralleling output tubes or using transmitter tubes (845, 211) requires a third driver stage and sometimes even a cathode follower + a beast of a power supply.... So were looking for more than twice the complexity and component count...
Most of use give up or keep on dreaming....
SE - Interstage - PP in classA, I've heard credible reports from several that they sound like sunshine on a spring moring...
http://www.audiodesignguide.com/my/pp3.html
Simple design, 20W class-A, HT increase to 400-450 for <40W power, but drops out of class-A.
To get more power than KT88, 6550, EL34, 300B... will do in P-P is a pain in the ***....
So paralleling output tubes or using transmitter tubes (845, 211) requires a third driver stage and sometimes even a cathode follower + a beast of a power supply.... So were looking for more than twice the complexity and component count...
Most of use give up or keep on dreaming....
SE - Interstage - PP in classA, I've heard credible reports from several that they sound like sunshine on a spring moring...
I am using a universal SEAmp, triode, push pull, driving a full range planar speaker of my own design, 21" x 24" x 2.5". Using neodynium magnets. The amplifier uses2 x 6J5GT's, and 2 x EL38's and a GZ 37 RECTIFIER. I use variable bias so the amplifier can use any of the following valves :-7581A,KT88,KT66,EL35,EL38,EL34,12E1,12E14,S11E12,6550,TT21,5881,6L6. Which makes it truly a universal amp. It sounds great with the planar speakers much better than any other speaker I have made in the past.
You know a lot more about valves than I do!! All I DO IS FOLLOW SCHEMATICS. If it doesn't work , bad luck on to the next amp!! I also build speakers and I have built about 6 pairs of planar full range speakers from 21" to about 3 mtrs. I must say that these speakers sound wonderfully airy and clear, better than any box.
Cobra2 said:How do I check if an amp is running in class A?
If you can warm your hands from a distance of 300mm, it's Class A.
Seriously, you need a current probe and an oscilloscope. You measure the current going into the anode, and if it drops to zero at any point, you're entering Class B. It's easier to look at valve data sheets and draw loadlines to predict it...
Cobra2 said:I think I will search more for an old Dynaco or Citation to buy, and modify. Maybe a better start?
Or maybe something like this ARC VT60, reminded me visually of the old Dynaco. Couldn't find a schematic, just pics.
http://www.6v6gt.com/VT60/index.html
http://www.arcdb.ws/VT60/VT60.html
Jeff
You said that a ST70 costs to much.
Look here http://www.tubes4hifi.com/
I bought the VTA amp and I liked it alot.
There prices are really good.
Look here http://www.tubes4hifi.com/
I bought the VTA amp and I liked it alot.
There prices are really good.
vinylkid58 said:
Or maybe something like this ARC VT60, reminded me visually of the old Dynaco. Couldn't find a schematic, just pics.
http://www.6v6gt.com/VT60/index.html
http://www.arcdb.ws/VT60/VT60.html
Jeff
I like VT60. Its just so well and logically and err... honestly executed. And Manley is almost like that. Good sound, clean and forceful, only that 6922 & 6550 signature is always present. I would like it so much if it was based on 6SN7 & KT88.
Hi Cobra 2,
Couldn't help but to ask why you want to build a tube amp which is "not tube sounding"?
40~80Watt? why stop there? With a pair of 805, 200W is possible with 2+KV in PP. then you can have an apple to apple comparison with your Mosfet amp... Just a thought...
Cheers
Couldn't help but to ask why you want to build a tube amp which is "not tube sounding"?
40~80Watt? why stop there? With a pair of 805, 200W is possible with 2+KV in PP. then you can have an apple to apple comparison with your Mosfet amp... Just a thought...
Cheers
Why not 200W?
1) cost
2) heat
3) by experience, I know that most(?) tube-amps have more usable headroom.
But I could stretch to a 100-120+W ;-)
I have been looking at these...(links) any comments?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dl...MEWA:IT&viewitem=&item=170075401952&rd=1&rd=1
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dl...MEWA:IT&viewitem=&item=170075403784&rd=1&rd=1
Arne K
Why not tube-sound? What I think of tube-sound, is only good for jazz & classical...not talking guitar-amps and fuzz boxes here...
1) cost
2) heat
3) by experience, I know that most(?) tube-amps have more usable headroom.
But I could stretch to a 100-120+W ;-)
I have been looking at these...(links) any comments?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dl...MEWA:IT&viewitem=&item=170075401952&rd=1&rd=1
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dl...MEWA:IT&viewitem=&item=170075403784&rd=1&rd=1
Arne K
Why not tube-sound? What I think of tube-sound, is only good for jazz & classical...not talking guitar-amps and fuzz boxes here...
Hi Arne,
Maybe they would be better with electric guitar when tube power exceeded the 200Watt per channel? and have a better control over the speaker cones
I can't comment as I do not have the means to build >200W tube amp without breaking the bank...
Anyone tried this apple to apple comparison?
Cheers
Maybe they would be better with electric guitar when tube power exceeded the 200Watt per channel? and have a better control over the speaker cones
I can't comment as I do not have the means to build >200W tube amp without breaking the bank...
Anyone tried this apple to apple comparison?
Cheers
Hi Cobra 2, If I can drive my small planar speakers with only 20watts why do you need 100 watts. 30 watts is more than enough and you could get it with SEAmp, which would sound better than a P/P Amp and be cheaper to build , especially if you use normal speakers which are more sensitive than planars or ribbons. Yours Henry.
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Tubes / Valves
- The sound of... tubes !