The simplistic Salas low voltage shunt regulator

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
diyAudio Chief Moderator
Joined 2002
Paid Member
Hi,

I want to build Salas Reflektor to use in my amplifier buffer. It is the first time I try with a Shunt Regulator so I have some questions that need your help:

- The circuit need about 50mA / channel so 100mA in total. Is it ok if I set CCS current about 300mA? I think it is the minmum recommend current value?
- Is it ok to use FQP3N30 FQP3N30combo for M1 & M2 (two mosfets). Any change I need apply if I use those two?
- Did anyone compare SQ of Reflektor to Salas 1.2R or 1.1? Will I lost something if I go with the easier Reflektor?
What is the rail voltage level for your amplifier buffer? Is it (+) V only or symmetrical?
Make sure you count for the peak current draw. 200mA plus is very good spare.
M1 needs be PMOS, M2 needs be NMOS. Reverse in a negative reg. So no single type would do.
What's the better reg to use from those three depends on the application. Tell us more about that buffer.
 
The Calvin Buffer is very capable of driving cable capacitance.
You must allow for peak transients much higher than what the typical 10k to 100k loads would draw.
Your 300mA less 20mA as the Shunt minimum leaves 280mApk for the two Calvins.
140mApk compared to 50mA quiescent seems like a big enough margin (90mApk) for transients.

Can you see that the Iq is almost completely irrelevant to sizing a CCS/Shunt regulator?
 
diyAudio Chief Moderator
Joined 2002
Paid Member
It is a calvin buffer out buffer. It run on +-15v and use about 100ma for two channels. I have an transformer that can out +-25vdc after filter capacitors. I did have a typo. I have both pmos and nmos version of the mosfet.

You may use a couple of Reflektor-D with R1=2 Ohm, two LM329 instead of LEDS (cathodes in reverse than LEDS) and a JFET (G+S shorted) instead of R6 with your MOSFETS. You can stack them for symmetry and virtual center point ground as shown at the bottom of the Ref-D pdf guide. Will do 15.22V symmetrical @ 300mA current limit per rail that way. Give them 22V raw DC in at least. Calculate dissipation* and get proper sinks. They should give you less than 0.001 Ohm extended output impedance and good stability. You may use J113 if difficult to get surely genuine 2SK117GR, with a small noise penalty, but well passable for an analogue line level buffer's rail noise demand.

*
WM1=ICCS*(VinDC-VoutDC)
WM2=VoutDC*(ICCS-ILoad)
 
@Andrew: I got what you mean. Iq will only applied when there is no input signal. And we need to take care of maximum peak current when we use Salas Shunt regulator.

@Salas: Thank you for your circuit recommend and extra info! I will try to follow it and will come up later with a schematic to confirm. BTW, how 2SK246GR or 2SK170BL compare to 2SK117GR in R6 position?
 
Last edited:
I will try to find some 2SK117GR since it was prefered. Here is the schematic that I will use to build. Please correct if I done something wrong.
 

Attachments

  • salas.png
    salas.png
    23 KB · Views: 296
diyAudio Chief Moderator
Joined 2002
Paid Member
Looks drawn alright. Being based on my 2011 linked example from post#2 using IRF640 it has C1,R5 heavier values. Better use 1R & 0.1uF for those lighter gm and Ciss FQP MOSFET types.

As for 2SK117GR, if you are not 100% sure they are genuine, better use J113. In a very recent example for SSHV2 in the HV regs thread an Australian user had drift and noise problems because of fakes.
 
diyAudio Member RIP
Joined 2005
2SK2145

As for 2SK117GR, if you are not 100% sure they are genuine, better use J113. In a very recent example for SSHV2 in the HV regs thread an Australian user had drift and noise problems because of fakes.
Although Toshiba has discontinued all of the leaded parts afaik, a dual in SM exists, the 2SK2145, which might be useable with some sort of adapter socket. They also tied the two channels together instead of bringing both ends of them out and using a sixth pin, which I found remarkably short-sighted.

edit: the 2145 is essentially two SK117
 
I didn't know that 2N4403s was low noise, I checked again and I think in same condition with 2N5401, 2N4403s has NF = 1dB. I choice 2N5401 because I have a lot of them.

I have some Toshiba A1015GR (original - get from Japan) which NF = 1dB. I also have some OnSemi BC556B, Fairchild KSA992. Do you think it is ok to use one of those? If not, I will try to get some 2N4403s.

I think I can use J113 in J1 and 2SK880 in J2. PJ2 = 4ma x 14V = 56mW seem still ok.
 
Last edited:
diyAudio Member RIP
Joined 2005
The A1015's are as good if not bit more linear and noiseless.
Yes, rbb' for 4403 and 1015 is about the same, with the 1015GR having a somewhat higher beta than the typical 4403 if memory serves.

It's interesting that the 2N4403 was designed for switching applications, and it was regarded by some as a trade secret that it had low noise with low source impedances. One friend made something of a name for himself at TRW by designing a preamp for very-low-resistance detectors using the 4403, back in the 70's, that was better than that of the resident low-noise-preamp specialist.
 
diyAudio Chief Moderator
Joined 2002
Paid Member
Yes, rbb' for 4403 and 1015 is about the same, with the 1015GR having a somewhat higher beta than the typical 4403 if memory serves.

It's interesting that the 2N4403 was designed for switching applications, and it was regarded by some as a trade secret that it had low noise with low source impedances. One friend made something of a name for himself at TRW by designing a preamp for very-low-resistance detectors using the 4403, back in the 70's, that was better than that of the resident low-noise-preamp specialist.

JC was using those for low noise audio back then. Something he learned in Ampex if I remember well by reading one of his reminiscing posts.
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.