The Amazing Fet Circlotron by Mike Rothacher

Cheers for the feedback Mike, I've found another article on that heatsink I have in mind, with an 85W thermal load it's 29deg above ambient, using the standard fan. My use will have slightly less air throughput, but your article indicates 60W per channel, therefore 30W per FET, easy enough to stay under 25 aa.
Got my fan in the mail yesterday, it's a shame to have it out of view, looks so good, and can't hear it without sticking my ears into the blades, may need a re-wire though, it takes alot of heat to make it go fast.

Isn't it be best though to keep each channel in some kind of thermal contact also? I'll keep the airflow symmetrical enough, but maybe a copper bus bar linking them would keep them behaving more equal, lower distortion, and substantially increase the thermal reservior.

160VA and 300VA is all that's available locally, and there's a proportional price difference. In the future when money grows on trees I'll be able to replace them if they get hot.
 
Pass DIY Apprentice
Joined 2001
Paid Member
160 VA should do the trick for a single channel.

You'll want to keep your output MOSFETs at the same temp. If your fan is temperature controlled, setting the bias may take a little extra time to get just right. Exercise patience and check your DC offset as things settle.

Speaking of transformers, Nelson wasn't kidding about rotating the transformers to reduce noise. I've noticed 20-30 uV differences by rotating them a few degrees. If you can measure noise levels that low, it's a great tweak: effective, sound, and free.
 
Pass DIY Apprentice
Joined 2001
Paid Member
Somewhat preliminary, but here's a test of an "Antimatter" channel using the LSK389 boards.

The noise figure I measured in the audio band was impressive at about 15 uV, which probably accounts for the improved THD at tiny power levels.

Board file and info to be posted this week.
 

Attachments

  • thdvpwr8.png
    thdvpwr8.png
    6.1 KB · Views: 1,775
Pass DIY Apprentice
Joined 2001
Paid Member
I really recommend balanced operation. The two-stage capacitor-less iteration is certainly the way to go in my mind.

However, realizing that might not be possible for some constructors, I had intended to look at three circuits (2 active, 1 transformer) for "unbalancing" the input.

None have been tested, and it will probably be quite some time before I get to them all.

In the meantime, perhaps a few solutions could be worked out here in the forum.;)
 
Attached circuit does a nice job on converting single-ended input to balanced output. It's simple and nice sounding. I used PNP transistor cause I had them at hand - NPNs are OK too, just take care about polarity.
 

Attachments

  • se2bal.gif
    se2bal.gif
    6.9 KB · Views: 1,741
Looks like a good alternative. I found me a local source for the discontinued 2SJ74 though, stocked up with enough to make a few pairs.

Got the rest of my parts from digikey today, now I've got all the components. Tomorrow I'll cut some parts for the chassis, hoping to have it on the way to the anodiser on Sunday.

I'll make a picturey worklog on the AudioEnz forums, and put a link here to it.


Are you going to get Antimatter Circlotron badges made?
 
I was thinking a Russian block capitals type font would be a good theme, crazy soviet space technology etc. I'm going to carve myself a big mold into wood and cast it in lead.

As for the 2SJ74, I'll not assist in them leaving the country until the rest of the world runs out, but gladly share the link with locals (and have). Just found it with a bit of googling anyway.