AP uses 47pF between pin 6 and pin 8 of the '797.
But be sure you have some means to check for oscillation (or not).
Jan
But be sure you have some means to check for oscillation (or not).
Jan
@johnego I am using the board from the DIY Audio Store. I don’t think it would work without D5 in place. Then how can I listen without LM440? Are you referring to some additional extension?
Oh, so LM440 is a zener in place of the LM329. It has nothing to do with whether you can or cannot add pre-regulation. If you ask whether LM440 noise is good enough, I think yes. I have never compared the LM329 as I thought it is not critical. LM317 is a 3-leg independent regulator. It is used as pre-regulator so that the input to SR will be regulated.
The second part of your post is exactly what I inquired above. What changes do I need to make to the circuit to make AD797 stable? This would be a great help. Thank you!
There, the Master already answer you. I changed the circuit but I don't have the file right now (in an old harddisk, right now I'm using SSD).
@johnego Would a pre-regulator provide any improvement if my power source is a battery? I use a 13V 16AH LiFePO4 battery that I need to charge only once a month at most.
AP uses 47pF between pin 6 and pin 8 of the '797.
But be sure you have some means to check for oscillation (or not).
Perfect. Thank you Jan! I have a 100MHz desktop digital oscilloscope. If I need anything else to check for oscillations, please let me know.
AP uses 47pF between pin 6 and pin 8 of the '797.
The little Cedarburg card I designed for the M2x power amp, has an AD797 without external compensation capacitor. Pins 1, 5, and 8 are floating. And yet it's perfectly stable at unity gain.
_
Attachments
@johnego Would a pre-regulator provide any improvement if my power source is a battery? I use a 13V 16AH LiFePO4 battery that I need to charge only once a month at most.
I have no experience with using regulator with batteries. I guess the SR functions differently here because there is no ripples etc. from the battery itself, so it can be something like lowering impedance etc.
My experience with battery is with power amplifier (Hiraga). Most complain about battery used here is about bass dynamics. I think that's about high impedance of the battery. The battery should charge large capacitors with low impedance and let the capacitors charge the amplifier...
But your preamp (or is it DAC) current requirement is small and your battery is I think sufficiently overrated in current capacity and voltage. I'm not sure what is needed from the regulator here. Probably shunt type is better. If you use SR, play around with the series transistor (if you have the inventory). Will be better if the transistor drops more voltage (at least not too few). Find high hfe transistor to lower the output impedance. There are many medium transistors with crazy hfe.
Hope others or Jan can explain about the issue so you can get the best out of your SR without accidents or having to use the expensive AD979.
The little Cedarburg card I designed for the M2x power amp, has an AD797 without external compensation capacitor. Pins 1, 5, and 8 are floating. And yet it's perfectly stable at unity gain.
Is it called noise gain? There are many ways to make it stable. The case here is to make the SR stable without doing redesign of the component or PCB 😉
@johnego The issue is the low output impedance of the power supply in the signal frequency range. Batteries alone sound horrible. Capacitors are better, but large ones have a low impedance only at low frequencies. A good regulator, such as the SR, drops the impedance dramatically in a wide frequency range. The USB audio signal is 480Mb/s (MHz) and the SR beats capacitors hands down.
Last edited:
The little Cedarburg card I designed for the M2x power amp, has an AD797 without external compensation capacitor. Pins 1, 5, and 8 are floating. And yet it's perfectly stable at unity gain.
Mark, thank you so much for your insight. I am not an expert and I wonder if you could please explain how your post translates to using AD797 specifically in the Super Regulator. Should I leave certain pins floating or try without a capacitor, etc.? Thanks again! -Alex
When Walt and I worked on these regulators, many years ago, we had issues with stability of the 797 version in some cases. We could not find a cure-all for it so we discouraged its use.
But it is perfectly possible that in your application, wiring, load etc it will be stable. But you should check it.
Jan
But it is perfectly possible that in your application, wiring, load etc it will be stable. But you should check it.
Jan
The little Cedarburg card I designed for the M2x power amp, has an AD797 without external compensation capacitor. Pins 1, 5, and 8 are floating. And yet it's perfectly stable at unity gain.
_
Scott would know best but I think the cap from 6 to 8 is the distortion cancellation cap (decomp when to GND), and it's actually harder to make the circuit unity gain stable with it populated.
for dual 24v (positive) supply
Got a Naim Stageline phono pre, all discrete, that uses a PAIR of 24v supplies (one per channel).
If I want to use 2 of the positive superregs, each set to 24vdc, can I use a single (meanwell 27v)SMPS to power them both? What are the considerations?
Also, for the same application, can use the negative superreg, flipping the output polarity, to use it as a positive reg (to get my 2nd +24vdc)?
thanks.
Got a Naim Stageline phono pre, all discrete, that uses a PAIR of 24v supplies (one per channel).
If I want to use 2 of the positive superregs, each set to 24vdc, can I use a single (meanwell 27v)SMPS to power them both? What are the considerations?
Also, for the same application, can use the negative superreg, flipping the output polarity, to use it as a positive reg (to get my 2nd +24vdc)?
thanks.
Last edited:
Yes to the first, assuming that they all share the same ground.
Yes to the second, but then the flipped negative must be supplied from a separate floating supply because its ground now becomes a pos output.
If you draw the basic block schematic, it will be clear.
Jan
Yes to the second, but then the flipped negative must be supplied from a separate floating supply because its ground now becomes a pos output.
If you draw the basic block schematic, it will be clear.
Jan
Would there be any performance increase by using the Saligny bridge rectifiers
We make electronics ! – Evotronix SRL
3rd group buy for Synchronous Bridge aka Ideal Bridge
in place of the standard diodes to power the SuperRegs?
the claim behind Saligny is less switching noise...
We make electronics ! – Evotronix SRL
3rd group buy for Synchronous Bridge aka Ideal Bridge
in place of the standard diodes to power the SuperRegs?
the claim behind Saligny is less switching noise...
I have no experience with such circuits. Diode switching noise can anyway be minimized by using fast, soft recovery diodes.
But you can give it a try.
Jan
But you can give it a try.
Jan
@noviygera
Maybe give these a looksee?
Rectifiers 22A 600V IXYS (Fred)
https://www.mouser.ca/ProductDetail/IXYS/FBE22-06N1?qs=t7yjd2JO/gQZcPlfp0TXTw==
Maybe give these a looksee?
Rectifiers 22A 600V IXYS (Fred)
https://www.mouser.ca/ProductDetail/IXYS/FBE22-06N1?qs=t7yjd2JO/gQZcPlfp0TXTw==
Is there a lesser expensive part for lower current <1 amp?
Oh, I see the datasheet. The four diodes are built into one package. Then it's not so expensive.
https://www.mouser.ca/datasheet/2/240/FBE22-06N1-1547529.pdf
Oh, I see the datasheet. The four diodes are built into one package. Then it's not so expensive.
https://www.mouser.ca/datasheet/2/240/FBE22-06N1-1547529.pdf
Last edited:
- Home
- The diyAudio Store
- Super Regulator