Studio Reference Amplifier

check this 100x77.7
 

Attachments

  • SR50.pdf
    32.6 KB · Views: 1,489
  • SR50.GIF
    SR50.GIF
    46.8 KB · Views: 6,084
SR50, SR200

Good design , apex. Mind if I make a voltage board out of it ??
hawksford cascode meets hitachi topology ....


A few comments/questions.

1 . why 47k for r22/23? , mje340/350 are low hfe , might need more current for stable cascode reference. also , why do you reference cascode to ground.

2.why no CCS for input pair , this might make for better sonics at the expense of PSRR.

3.very small Vbe decoupling.. - .22uF ???

4. C10/11 ... are there OPS stability issues ?? I have only needed this on my prototype triple EF's.

Still , nice in general... might need a 100 x 100mm voltage board layout to do it.(lots of trannies) But I will , as well as simulate the heck out of it. :D
OS
 
Good design , apex. Mind if I make a voltage board out of it ??
hawksford cascode meets hitachi topology ....


A few comments/questions.

1 . why 47k for r22/23? , mje340/350 are low hfe , might need more current for stable cascode reference. also , why do you reference cascode to ground.

2.why no CCS for input pair , this might make for better sonics at the expense of PSRR.

3.very small Vbe decoupling.. - .22uF ???

4. C10/11 ... are there OPS stability issues ?? I have only needed this on my prototype triple EF's.

Still , nice in general... might need a 100 x 100mm voltage board layout to do it.(lots of trannies) But I will , as well as simulate the heck out of it. :D
OS
Hi OS,
1. I always use 1N4148 with 1-1,5mA reff to gnd for CCS or cascode and it's stable with half of this current.
2. I considering to use CCS with FET instead 15k resistor.
3. I usualy don't use Vbe decoupling or very small value 22nF.
4. I don't use C10/11 for my home amp, it's add only for DIY version.
Regards