Slewmaster - CFA vs. VFA "Rumble"

BTW, you can use the LEDs with 1K resistors in series instead of the big relays for initial testing, just to see everything goes right - it's easy to see them switching on one by one as soft-start is performed...

Also, for better understanding of the plugs' polarity on the board. You can see a sort of a "key" on one side of each 2-pin plug. This plug always indicates the "bottom" pin, as shown on schematic. The other pin is the "top" one.

Sorry, I meant "This key always indicates..."
 
I'm back!

No Internet (wired) here 😡 .
Took a month to research 3G/Evdo wireless (expensive B$ ISP's).

Have 2 new IPS's.

VFA/superpair version

AND a CFA/superpair with 1K/V us.

Both self clamp on saturation.

Glad to see this thread did not fall into oblivion. :RIP: 🙂

?? Lateral OPS ? any boards ?


OS
 
No Internet (wired) here 😡 .
Took a month to research 3G/Evdo wireless (expensive B$ ISP's).

Have 2 new IPS's.

VFA/superpair version

AND a CFA/superpair with 1K/V us.

Both self clamp on saturation.

Glad to see this thread did not fall into oblivion. :RIP: 🙂

?? Lateral OPS ? any boards ?


OS

We have been waiting for the new IPS. Looking forward to seeing them.

Jason designed a couple layouts for the Lateral IPS. I've been waiting to see if he was going order some. If not I will. I'd be happy to send you a pair if I'm the one who orders them.

I etched the first layout and they actually work very well with the CFA-XH and the Wolverine.

Blessings, Terry
 
We have been waiting for the new IPS. Looking forward to seeing them.

Jason designed a couple layouts for the Lateral IPS. I've been waiting to see if he was going order some. If not I will. I'd be happy to send you a pair if I'm the one who orders them.

I etched the first layout and they actually work very well with the CFA-XH and the Wolverine.

Blessings, Terry

Once Spooky is ready I will get some of the Mini OPS at the same time.

I'm looking forward to the latest too :drool:
 
Only 2 IPS's ... but they rock !

The VFA (attachment 1) is the original luxman IPS + a super-pair VAS.
- 10ppm THD20
-soft clipping
- faster slew than the typical VFA.

The CFA (attachment 2) is a re-do of the NAD-CFA.
The super-pair not only alleviates the stress on the current FB stage,but
has faster slew ,easier current trim , and the same "self-clamping" clip
behavior (attachment 3).

Both are literally saturation proof ( superpair to-92's shut off .. att 3 - upper plot) ... with
"tubelike" clip harmonics.
.... Less load on either VFA or CFA input stages .... superpairs are like
the blameless beta enhanced VAS , but with superior speed,slew and
overload characteristics. 😎

I now see why this is the Yamaha "way". Apex on the forum has also
used the superpair.

PS - on this forum (I might be wrong) ... this is the first "symmetric
super-pair"


OS
 

Attachments

  • VFA-ESP.jpg
    VFA-ESP.jpg
    103.7 KB · Views: 443
  • CFA-ESP.jpg
    CFA-ESP.jpg
    135 KB · Views: 431
  • superpair-clip.jpg
    superpair-clip.jpg
    65.8 KB · Views: 425
Sweet. Any concerns about the super pair and internal stability? Some info I've read suggests they can be finicky.

I read that too !!

The Koda KD261 has a "cult following" (they mod this amp like a hotrod).
It also has a bad habit of instability (attachment 1).

The Yamaha XP series , on the other hand , has the best record for reliability.
😕

Superpairs are actually a very tight FB loop. The probe shows the pole is
near the Ft of the BJT's.
Beta is close to the wolverine/badger ... only a few uA to "swing" the VAS.

Look at the 2'nd attachment .... slew is 500V/uS with no tweaks.
Superpairs are much faster than the hawksford/single BJT.

PS - I was also both apprehensive and surprised by the superpair's performance.
I could only imagine the slew of a CFA-X/super-pair combo ... overkill ??
😀😀 ... (2kV+ ?)


OS
 

Attachments

  • Koda.jpg
    Koda.jpg
    51.7 KB · Views: 445
  • CFAESP slew.jpg
    CFAESP slew.jpg
    37 KB · Views: 442
OS, welcome back.

I have so many question to you but right now I will ask one question only 😀.
Why did you discontinue about GLA IPS and change it to Symasui IPS? I sim GLA IPS, it have very low THD.


The GLA is just a differential feeding a second differential (with a level shifting
I to V stage after).

The symasui is also just two differentials .... the difference being that the 2'nd
one also doubles as the I to V stage , as well.

In short , the Symasui performs just as good as the GLA without the extra
stability issues or complexity.

Loop gain and THD are nearly identical between the 2 variants.

I'm excited about both being online , still having 2 of my 4 PC's working
(pod storage was 80C and fried much of my electronics 😡😡).
A most frustrating and expensive relocation.... glad it is OVER !!

I am going to try a superpair "spooky" next ... maybe even a superpair/ hawksford "abomination" ... "hyper-VAS".
This will kill both the early effect AND device saturation.
I predict 1ppm THD20 , perfect clip , and almost CFA slew
for a spooky-superpair (superspook 😀 )

PS - my "prediction" is objectively based .... any previous design gets a 3-6db
CL gain boost , less loading , and a drastic clip/slew improvement over the hawksford
based designs. NO change in transient/stability tests.
OS
 
Last edited:
Why I am on the "superpair "kick" ...

Observe (attachment 1).

top plot is a perfect symmetrical overload.

Middle plot shows the low current superpair "clamping" the main
VAS bjt's .... (bottom plot).

The 3 Yamaha amps (schema's)... like this use no heatsink in the IPS ... ,
this is because all the stages actually dissipate LESS during
overload.

-The "blameless" overloads and draws more current from both
the beta enhancement device ( and both CCS's) .

-The Hawksford VAS's will also demand more current from the
preceding stage . This was (IS) an issue with most of the CFA
designs.

- We WILL clip our amps (even occasionally) .. the behavior at
this point will be heard (or we will smell it 😀 ).
Superpairs have classic "rounded" tops when over-driven (tube-like??)
- (attachment 2) ...

Hope this explains the improvements ... both in reliability and performance.

OS
 

Attachments

  • SPcurrents.jpg
    SPcurrents.jpg
    98.9 KB · Views: 416
  • rounded edge.jpg
    rounded edge.jpg
    33.3 KB · Views: 400
Hi OS! Great to see you back 😉
Just woke up on this side of the Earth... and so many things have happened 😛
I like your recearch on super-pair. Rounded tops clipping looks very cool.

Cheers,
Valery

Almost want to go to sleep on my side of the earth and wake up
on your side.... 😱

Just found out all I can do on Sprint PCS is surf google , buy things
from amazon/ebay ... or zone out on youtube !

ALL else is either censored of in violation of contract (bad sites , P2P).

WOW ! 🙁

Can't even get a new Linux ISO ! (legal)

The corporate masters still allow me to post on DIYA (for now).
OS
 
The VFA (attachment 1) is the original luxman IPS + a super-pair VAS.
- 10ppm THD20
-soft clipping
- faster slew than the typical VFA.

The CFA (attachment 2) is a re-do of the NAD-CFA.
The super-pair not only alleviates the stress on the current FB stage,but
has faster slew ,easier current trim , and the same "self-clamping" clip
behavior (attachment 3).

Both are literally saturation proof ( superpair to-92's shut off .. att 3 - upper plot) ... with
"tubelike" clip harmonics.
.... Less load on either VFA or CFA input stages .... superpairs are like
the blameless beta enhanced VAS , but with superior speed,slew and
overload characteristics. 😎

I now see why this is the Yamaha "way". Apex on the forum has also
used the superpair.

PS - on this forum (I might be wrong) ... this is the first "symmetric
super-pair"


OS

It is not first symmetric super (baxandall) pair on this forum, look the GainWire mk2 or some of my power CFA as this one http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/solid-state/243481-200w-mosfet-cfa-amp-51.html#post3999756.