Single Ended Tokin SIT THF-51S Common Drain Mu Follower Amplifier, 45W?

I think ZM's first Lazy Singing Bush is this one, which is a common drain mu follower:

Single Ended Tokin SIT THF-51S Common Drain Mu Follower Amplifier , 45W?

Ah, Lazy Bush... why lazy?

Am I right to assume that the "upper" PCB could run with a choke instead of the "lower" PCB (mu stage / CCS)? And the choke version could run at a much lower voltage (since there is no active current source that needs the extra voltage to work)?

Also, what's the reason for running four input JFETs in parallel? Wouldn't one be enough? Also, the PCB would be awkward without a 2SK77B, which I don't have... I guess I could just be lazy and build the input buffer in dead-bug style of a piece of strip board. Or use a beefy front end to start with...
 
Member
Joined 2004
Paid Member
Hi Ben,

Now that you have had more time with the Mu follower, how does it compare to the Choke loaded? I'm thinking about this for my summer amp as the 150W/Ch of dissipation is more than my room likes in the summer. What differences do you hear? How does the output impedance compare?

Thanks,
 
Member
Joined 2012
Paid Member
Hi Botte,

Are you asking about choke load for summer?

I enjoy both my Mu follower common drain THF-51S and choke loaded 2SK180 follower equally. I don't know if I hear any big difference in sound between the two. When I have one or the other in the system, I do not miss the one that is not in the system. Because my speakers are very sensitive, the difference in power output between the two is also not an issue.

I am not sure exactly what your question is about 2.3A, but I would keep Vds to about 33V to 35V. That seems to be a good value. Interestingly, I did some LTSpice runs because of your questions and the simulations show that for the Mu follower THf-51S with 66VDC power supply and Vds=33V, there is really not much difference in power or distortion between 2.3A and 3.0A. I should have done a bit more investigation initially. However that is based on LTSpice simulation and not on actual testing of the amplifier.

I also did some LTSpice simulations to determine output impedance. The Mu follower THF-51S was 0.35 Ohm and the 2SK180 choke load follower was 0.60 Ohm.
 
Member
Joined 2004
Paid Member
Hi Botte,

Are you asking about choke load for summer?

I enjoy both my Mu follower common drain THF-51S and choke loaded 2SK180 follower equally. I don't know if I hear any big difference in sound between the two. When I have one or the other in the system, I do not miss the one that is not in the system. Because my speakers are very sensitive, the difference in power output between the two is also not an issue.

I am not sure exactly what your question is about 2.3A, but I would keep Vds to about 33V to 35V. That seems to be a good value. Interestingly, I did some LTSpice runs because of your questions and the simulations show that for the Mu follower THf-51S with 66VDC power supply and Vds=33V, there is really not much difference in power or distortion between 2.3A and 3.0A. I should have done a bit more investigation initially. However that is based on LTSpice simulation and not on actual testing of the amplifier.

I also did some LTSpice simulations to determine output impedance. The Mu follower THF-51S was 0.35 Ohm and the 2SK180 choke load follower was 0.60 Ohm.
Hi Ben,

Yes, the choke loaded version of the thf-51s

Sounds like you think the supply should be just a bit more than half. So my MU is at 64v and Vds is 33. So with 2.3A bias across the 1 ohm choke 2.3v drop. So I need about a 36v supply.

As for the output impedance, see attached actual impedance sweep. The sim is very close. What about the THF-51 choke loaded?

thanks
 

Attachments

  • 9FD54E91-8389-41C2-B1A1-2EB5437E8640.jpeg
    9FD54E91-8389-41C2-B1A1-2EB5437E8640.jpeg
    197.9 KB · Views: 95
Member
Joined 2012
Paid Member
So I did LTSpice for a Hammond 193V loaded THF-51S follower, 36VDC PS, Iq 2.3A, Vds 33.7V.

The simulation gave 0.45 Ohm output impedance.

The output power was much less than the Mu follower version as the Mu follower provided quite the boost. The choke loaded version maxed out at somewhere between 20W and 25W, depending on how much distortion and clipping is tolerated. This is more or less the same as my 2SK180 choked loaded follower amp's power.

The THF-51S has a higher power rating than the 2SK180 so I increase Iq to 2.8A, Vds 33.2V. That added about 7 or 8W of power output. However the distortion profile changed to less H2 such that H2 was less than H3. But that was LTSpice and reality may be different. :)
 
The one and only
Joined 2001
Paid Member
H2 vs H3 is very dependent on all the variables - AC and DC Volts, Current and Load, as well as the parameters specific to the part. These are the blessings and curses that come with Triode-like character, and you pretty much have to measure and adjust against all these things to get a particular performance, and maybe not even then.

That said, it's worth the effort.

:snail:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Member
Joined 2012
Paid Member
This is what I have been using. I can't remember where I found it.

.SUBCKT thf51 D G S ; Drain Gate Source
+ PARAMS: MU=43.571 X=1.494 K=1.339 N=0.902 VCT=0.831 RG=5MEG
*--------------------------------------------------
B1 D S I=K*PWR(URAMP((V(G,S)+VCT)+(N*LN(V(D,S))+(V(D,S)/MU))),X)
FOR MULTISIM COMMENT OUT ABOVE LINE () AND UNCOMMENT NEXT LINE
*B1 D S I=K*PWR(MAX((V(G,S)+VCT)+(N*LN(V(D,S))+(V(D,S)/MU)),0),X)
R1 G S {RG}
CGS G S 5000P
CGD G D 5000P
CDS G S 0P
.ENDS thf51-1x0063
 

Attachments

  • THF51.txt
    441 bytes · Views: 111
Member
Joined 2012
Paid Member
Looking for a diy electronics challenge, I downloaded KiCad the other day and gave it a try. I've always used perf board for building amplifiers that I concocted but with the availability of low priced pcb manufacturers, I thought why not give it a try.

So after a few days, this is what I have. Being a complete newby, I hope there aren't any errors, fatal or otherwise.
 

Attachments

  • THF-51S Follower KiCad 3D 1.png
    THF-51S Follower KiCad 3D 1.png
    57.9 KB · Views: 380
  • THF-51S Follower KiCad 3D 2.png
    THF-51S Follower KiCad 3D 2.png
    56.1 KB · Views: 293
  • THF-51S Follower KiCad Board Top.png
    THF-51S Follower KiCad Board Top.png
    28.5 KB · Views: 361
  • THF-51S KiCad Schematic.png
    THF-51S KiCad Schematic.png
    5.2 KB · Views: 407
  • THF-51S Mu Follower Schematic.png
    THF-51S Mu Follower Schematic.png
    20.2 KB · Views: 417
  • Like
Reactions: 10 users