Russian PIO caps. Should I use them?

McIntosh MC-30’s MC-75’s, Fisher 400 & HH Scott 299c. Good enough for my old ears.
 

Attachments

  • 3730254C-BAA5-48DA-B597-D505763C39D8.jpeg
    3730254C-BAA5-48DA-B597-D505763C39D8.jpeg
    371.3 KB · Views: 242
  • 888F040F-9357-4298-B6E5-A8CD3700DE8E.jpeg
    888F040F-9357-4298-B6E5-A8CD3700DE8E.jpeg
    721.6 KB · Views: 235
  • 22DE7704-C95C-4189-A04B-19B9AC9991F0.jpeg
    22DE7704-C95C-4189-A04B-19B9AC9991F0.jpeg
    602.8 KB · Views: 249
1. Are the last 2 digits of the K73-XX used to indicate the form factor such as radial or axial only?
2. There are various K40 and K42 types of PIO, e.g. K40Y9, K42Y2. Is there any rule of thumb to indicate one is superior to the other?
1. It's only a design number starting from 1. Nothing else.
2. There is not. Some of them are better some are not. You just have to know (to read) about their design or to listen to other 'audiophiles' opinions.
 
It looks to me two legs are the capacitance, the other two are connections to the capacitor's metal case for shielding. Those should be grounded to have an effect. Test with a DMM which ones are which. Capacitance mode and continuity mode should answer.
 
If the extra legs are only there for extra mechanical stability, its weird for such low mass caps. Unless they were made to withstand high G force in jets & missiles. Or they stem from some kind of an internal shield.