Sheldon,
Thanks for pointing me to that thread. The SymAsym is interesting, especially if it has boards available.
However, this amp is still my preference! So what you are saying is that I won't be able to get the boards for this amp! ???
Yes I understand that it is not easy with perfboard so perhaps I shouldn't attempt that. A good amp is a good amp, whether it is used for the tweeter or not. I guess most amps behave well at low / mid frequencies. It is hard to find an amp that sounds smooth, accurate, transparent without much noise, sharp edges or brightness in the treble. I think this amp will do extremely well.
Regards,
Bill
Thanks for pointing me to that thread. The SymAsym is interesting, especially if it has boards available.
However, this amp is still my preference! So what you are saying is that I won't be able to get the boards for this amp! ???

Yes I understand that it is not easy with perfboard so perhaps I shouldn't attempt that. A good amp is a good amp, whether it is used for the tweeter or not. I guess most amps behave well at low / mid frequencies. It is hard to find an amp that sounds smooth, accurate, transparent without much noise, sharp edges or brightness in the treble. I think this amp will do extremely well.
Regards,
Bill
This is a brilliant amp, a brilliant creation, with tremendous amount of efforts and top talent behind it.
If there are no PCBs, no kits available, then ordinary DIYers won't be able to benefit from it, a degeneration of the spirit of the DIY community. This amp has been brought to a death as far as DIY is concerned for most DIYers, except for those who have advanced skills and experiences to learn from it.
The more brilliant the amplifier is, the more shameful this fact is.
If there are no PCBs, no kits available, then ordinary DIYers won't be able to benefit from it, a degeneration of the spirit of the DIY community. This amp has been brought to a death as far as DIY is concerned for most DIYers, except for those who have advanced skills and experiences to learn from it.
The more brilliant the amplifier is, the more shameful this fact is.
Last edited:
Bill,
This is, I agree, a brilliantly conceived amp. But as a rule, the better the product, the worse the marketing.
You can get the patterns for the pcb - I think Sheldon has them in fact - and then have proto pcbs built at ourpcb.com in China for around $US110 including shipping to Oz.
The Symasym was designed by Michael Bittner, a very clever young software engineer. He and Mihai Rauta have both given selflessly of their time here. Strongly recommended.
Hugh
This is, I agree, a brilliantly conceived amp. But as a rule, the better the product, the worse the marketing.
You can get the patterns for the pcb - I think Sheldon has them in fact - and then have proto pcbs built at ourpcb.com in China for around $US110 including shipping to Oz.
The Symasym was designed by Michael Bittner, a very clever young software engineer. He and Mihai Rauta have both given selflessly of their time here. Strongly recommended.
Hugh
I pointed out the symasym thread, partly because it incorporates some of Mihai's design input, uses more readily available parts, can use a single output pair and partly because there is some group buy activity on boards. Search the forums, if you are interested in that.
But if you really want to build this amp, then go for it. I bought the boards as part of an earlier group buy. Maybe someone has an extra pair. If not, the files for the boards are in the first few pages of the thread. You can have them made by Hugh's source. Were I to use it as a tweeter amp, I'd be tempted to mount the six output transistors, but leave out the base stopper and emitter resistor for Q2/25/4/27. That way you can still use the diodes for bias but only use the output from a single pair. Later, if you need the full power, just add the base and emitter resistors (assuming adequate heat sinking).
Search through the tread for parts too. I think someone mentioned getting some parts and matching them (pooge, maybe?). There are group buys on the forum for the input jfet's. I have extra's of matched BC parts and. I also have extra's of the 2sa/2sc, and the jfet's but no real tight matches of either.
Sheldon
But if you really want to build this amp, then go for it. I bought the boards as part of an earlier group buy. Maybe someone has an extra pair. If not, the files for the boards are in the first few pages of the thread. You can have them made by Hugh's source. Were I to use it as a tweeter amp, I'd be tempted to mount the six output transistors, but leave out the base stopper and emitter resistor for Q2/25/4/27. That way you can still use the diodes for bias but only use the output from a single pair. Later, if you need the full power, just add the base and emitter resistors (assuming adequate heat sinking).
Search through the tread for parts too. I think someone mentioned getting some parts and matching them (pooge, maybe?). There are group buys on the forum for the input jfet's. I have extra's of matched BC parts and. I also have extra's of the 2sa/2sc, and the jfet's but no real tight matches of either.
Sheldon
Thanks, Hugh and Sheldon.
I think at this stage I would need to do a bit of studies and see if I could obtain all the parts and match them, etc.
I don't know much about power amps but have built 5 power amplifiers from kits and have just realised some of the major mistakes I made. When I looked at the PCB design of this amp it seemed to me it would solve all the problems I previously had. So I trust that both the circuit and PCB are so well engineered, before I even have to time to read through the historical evolution of this marvellous piece of design.
Regards,
Bill
I think at this stage I would need to do a bit of studies and see if I could obtain all the parts and match them, etc.
I don't know much about power amps but have built 5 power amplifiers from kits and have just realised some of the major mistakes I made. When I looked at the PCB design of this amp it seemed to me it would solve all the problems I previously had. So I trust that both the circuit and PCB are so well engineered, before I even have to time to read through the historical evolution of this marvellous piece of design.
Regards,
Bill
Hi Bill,
This amp and his PCB is 100% stable and functional.
Unfortunately, or not 🙂 ?, I do not earn my bread from electronics design and so I do not have more time to invest in this thread. From my point of view this is a complete and finished project.
Subjectively, for me and some friends of mine, this amplifier sound very good and actually drive my expensive pair of speakers very well and accurate.
I agree with Hugh that marketing is worse for good products but this is not a commercial design and so there is no marketing behind 😉
If you have questions uncovered by this thread I would gladly help you, but first I'll humbly encourage you to make an effort and read it all. There is no free lunch 😉
DYI is first of all a lots of fun and an enjoyable activity. The path is more enjoyable then the goal, at least for me 😀
Have fun,
Mihai
This amp and his PCB is 100% stable and functional.
Unfortunately, or not 🙂 ?, I do not earn my bread from electronics design and so I do not have more time to invest in this thread. From my point of view this is a complete and finished project.
Subjectively, for me and some friends of mine, this amplifier sound very good and actually drive my expensive pair of speakers very well and accurate.
I agree with Hugh that marketing is worse for good products but this is not a commercial design and so there is no marketing behind 😉
If you have questions uncovered by this thread I would gladly help you, but first I'll humbly encourage you to make an effort and read it all. There is no free lunch 😉
DYI is first of all a lots of fun and an enjoyable activity. The path is more enjoyable then the goal, at least for me 😀
Have fun,
Mihai
Last edited:
Hi Bill,
......The path is more enjoyable then the goal, at least for me 😀
Have fun,
Mihai
real Mountaineer

How to deal with 2SC5200/2SA1943
Hello,
did anybody try to modify thje design to use 2SC5200/2SA1943 ?
CAn anybody tell the experience or share the design. How to integrate or design the mentioned Vbe multiplier.
Anybody any idea ?
Kind regards
Josh
Hello,
did anybody try to modify thje design to use 2SC5200/2SA1943 ?
CAn anybody tell the experience or share the design. How to integrate or design the mentioned Vbe multiplier.
Anybody any idea ?
Kind regards
Josh
did anybody try to modify thje design to use 2SC5200/2SA1943 ?
CAn anybody tell the experience or share the design. How to integrate or design the mentioned Vbe multiplier.
I'm no expert, so I would seek confirmation for what I say. That said, I think you can replace the diode string with a typical VBE multiplier. Here's the version on the Symasym (which I have built): http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/atta...signed-michael-bittner-our-mikeb-symasym4.gif
If you look closely, you can see that you just replace the diode string, with a transistor and voltage divider. The rest of the circuit is very much the same. The only difference is that the FC100 uses a 15pf cap divider to the ground leg, while the Symasym uses 330pf caps paralleled with 47k resistors. If I were to try it, I would just replace the diode string with the Bd135 and it's resistive divider, and leave everything else as is. Of course, the VBE multiplier transistor must be located on the heatsink with the output transistors. Good approach is to fasten it directly on top of one of the outputs.
Sheldon
In the quest of trying to beat my Vincent SV236 with a DIY amp, I was refered to this thread. So here I am, and I started building it. I'll be back soon with lots of questions 🙂
In the quest of trying to beat my Vincent SV236 with a DIY amp, I was refered to this thread. So here I am, and I started building it. I'll be back soon with lots of questions 🙂
Welcome to the club!
I can guarantee you that rmi-fc100 will satisfy your needs 😉
I've always wanted to the same you did - build an ultimate solid state with DAC inside. Which DAC did you put in?
In the quest of trying to beat my Vincent SV236 with a DIY amp, I was refered to this thread. So here I am, and I started building it. I'll be back soon with lots of questions 🙂

q1: I guess it won't hurt to use 1N5819 instead of 1N4004? I just happen to have full drawer of those...
I've always wanted to the same you did - build an ultimate solid state with DAC inside. Which DAC did you put in?
There's no DAC inside ... it was, but I've come to the conclusion that is much better to have it outside, in a separate enclosure. To much digital noise near by sensitive amplifier building blocks 😉
Q5/q4?
Schematics shows BD139 transistors, but BOM says it's 2SC3423Y for Q5/Q4. Which is correct?
Schematics shows BD139 transistors, but BOM says it's 2SC3423Y for Q5/Q4. Which is correct?
In case Mihai broke some body parts again, you sure you're not confusing the powersupply schematic with the BOM of the amp ?
The BD139 is a series device of the voltage regulator.
Eeer, the Roender Mihai FC25 Class A critter is definitely off the menu ?
The BD139 is a series device of the voltage regulator.
Eeer, the Roender Mihai FC25 Class A critter is definitely off the menu ?
In case Mihai broke some body parts again, you sure you're not confusing the powersupply schematic with the BOM of the amp ?
Nope, checked it again:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/atta...gle-stage-audio-power-amplifier-rmi-fc100.zip
Unless there is a corrected .sch later in the thread.
Nope, checked it again:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/atta...gle-stage-audio-power-amplifier-rmi-fc100.zip
Unless there is a corrected .sch later in the thread.
Not sure where that comes from, and I can't open it. But the schematic and BOM are in the first few pages of the thread. Q4/5 are output transistors. No BD139 parts in the amp. That part is used in the front end powersupply, but it's labeled T2.
Sheldon
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Solid State
- RMI-FC100, a single stage audio power amplifier