glt's blog has a nice write-up of the VREF mod. If you scroll down to the near-bottom, there is this comment from Paul (timestamp July 25, 2015 at 04:31):
Based on the timestamp, I'm pretty sure that the factory mod he's referring to is revision 2 (since revision 3 was end of 2015/early 2016).
But then Søren said this in post #4291 (emphasis added):
So, if I'm piecing this info together correctly, VREF capacitor values are:
Revision 1: X uF
Revision 2: X + Y uF
Revision 3: X + Y + 300 uF
Not sure what X and Y are. Also not sure if X+Y+300 is "enough". But, with those revision 3 through-holes, it looks to be a trivial mod, and presumably it can't hurt (right?).
I see all these shift registers are powered from the same source why dont addup just a large capacitor of value may be 44,000uf and it will definitely reduce the ripple to substantial level and yet the decoupling will do its best as its close to the chip.
Steve do not connect like C - you connect + and - of balanced output. You will get zero amplitude or regulators cut-off voltage and you get also zero.How about connecting SE like C ?
Will it provide more gain so that opamp can be ommitted.
Thanks Jacczy.
For dual mono config, may be the better way is to convert the balanced raw to unbalanced SE by 1:1 output transformer. I guess Jensen JT-11-YMPC or Vintage UTC-A22 can serve this purpose.
For dual mono config, may be the better way is to convert the balanced raw to unbalanced SE by 1:1 output transformer. I guess Jensen JT-11-YMPC or Vintage UTC-A22 can serve this purpose.
Last edited:
Sorry. I've made a mistake. I've swapped J7 (RAW) with J6 or J8 (balanced).Thanks Jacczy.
For dual mono config, may be the better way is to convert the balanced raw to unbalanced SE by 1:1 output transformer. I guess Jensen JT-11-YMPC or Vintage UTC-A22 can serve this purpose.
Mono dual config with unbalanced out would be great..
Each board's R2R networks decode one channel and parallel at the end like paralleling 1704 outputs.. 🙂
Hope Soren consider this idea.. 😛
Each board's R2R networks decode one channel and parallel at the end like paralleling 1704 outputs.. 🙂
Hope Soren consider this idea.. 😛
Hi Søren
How about OEM Version ?
Can you provide more detial for the OEM Version
I am looking forward to OEM version .
I still selecting between oem version or ver3 board
Thanks
How about OEM Version ?
Can you provide more detial for the OEM Version
I am looking forward to OEM version .
I still selecting between oem version or ver3 board
Thanks
Mono dual config with unbalanced out would be great..
Each board's R2R networks decode one channel and parallel at the end like paralleling 1704 outputs.. 🙂
Hope Soren consider this idea.. 😛
+1
Guys, may I ask a few simple questions which might hve been answered before, but 124 pages of reading...thats just a bit too much. So:
- Is the BBB direct i2s integration incl. feeding the clocks into the bbb by now a standard application ? I would see this as the ultimate in order to avoid all the usb issues ?
- I there a native balanced solution or is this by nature a SE-Dac ? The sabre is balanced by nature...
- What will bring the Dual-Mono-version ?
THx
- Is the BBB direct i2s integration incl. feeding the clocks into the bbb by now a standard application ? I would see this as the ultimate in order to avoid all the usb issues ?
- I there a native balanced solution or is this by nature a SE-Dac ? The sabre is balanced by nature...
- What will bring the Dual-Mono-version ?
THx
Guys, may I ask a few simple questions which might hve been answered before, but 124 pages of reading...thats just a bit too much. So:
- Is the BBB direct i2s integration incl. feeding the clocks into the bbb by now a standard application ? I would see this as the ultimate in order to avoid all the usb issues ?
You can forget about clocks - this one is almost immune to bad clock - yes really.
- I there a native balanced solution or is this by nature a SE-Dac ? The sabre is balanced by nature...
It is SE "by nature".
- What will bring the Dual-Mono-version ?
😕
THx
Blitz: If running two 1021 boards as dual mono, then you also have the possibility to run each board as separate channels, which means you take out true native balanced signal from the SE-outputs - one SE channel per phase.
Blitz: If running two 1021 boards as dual mono, then you also have the possibility to run each board as separate channels, which means you take out true native balanced signal from the SE-outputs - one SE channel per phase.
Does this bring a (very) big improvement?
I haven't tried, and i haven't seen anybody reported testing difference between the two.
But it is still hard to compare both - because if the gear after the DAC is built fully balanced - then there are of course losses feeding SE signal to a balanced stage (like a Pass Labs pre-amp/power amp combo). Pass pretty much always sound better with a balanced input signal, which they are actually built for.
But it is still hard to compare both - because if the gear after the DAC is built fully balanced - then there are of course losses feeding SE signal to a balanced stage (like a Pass Labs pre-amp/power amp combo). Pass pretty much always sound better with a balanced input signal, which they are actually built for.
I know the feeling of being overwhelmed with these threads that are full of great information!
I got the normundss boards (input/switch and mute) and am wondering how to hookup psu. I assume one psu per dam1021.
Just need to decide "which" psu I'm going to use and what is the best input voltage.
Considering oa-core transformers, it has three outputs
sets of outputs for versatile application
18-0-18 --- 1a
9-0 --- 0.8a
9-0 --- 0.8a
I figured the 9v would be fine for the dam1021's... Anybody care to comment? I plan to use a regulated psu for each 9v output from the trafo.
I am considering a psu off eBay from sellarZ - uln-ps1 bi polar psu. One for each dam1021.
I really would like to find a way to make a psu with belleson superpower mk2 regulators. I've used those in another project and never have I heard a more quiet source.
I'm a beginner with this but have spent a bit of time trying my best to learn. I really want to have a good regulated psu for the dam1021 and not cut corners. I'd like to get the very most out of this build. I really hope I am able to get the help I'll need to get my project complete. I will be on this thread a lot more often now. I just received my two 0.02% soekris dam1021's in the mail, the newest revisions. I didn't realize this version had improved onboard psu with 1000uF/16V caps now. Instead of the 820uF caps it had before. I was going to upgrade those but glad that already had been done.
I hope to get a lot of good advice on how to get My dual dam1021's setup correctly with the normundss boards. I also have been talking with kevinyip about getting a display done for the front panel. I hope it's compatible with the normundss mute kit/front panel selector.
🙂
I got the normundss boards (input/switch and mute) and am wondering how to hookup psu. I assume one psu per dam1021.
Just need to decide "which" psu I'm going to use and what is the best input voltage.
Considering oa-core transformers, it has three outputs
sets of outputs for versatile application
18-0-18 --- 1a
9-0 --- 0.8a
9-0 --- 0.8a
I figured the 9v would be fine for the dam1021's... Anybody care to comment? I plan to use a regulated psu for each 9v output from the trafo.
I am considering a psu off eBay from sellarZ - uln-ps1 bi polar psu. One for each dam1021.
I really would like to find a way to make a psu with belleson superpower mk2 regulators. I've used those in another project and never have I heard a more quiet source.
I'm a beginner with this but have spent a bit of time trying my best to learn. I really want to have a good regulated psu for the dam1021 and not cut corners. I'd like to get the very most out of this build. I really hope I am able to get the help I'll need to get my project complete. I will be on this thread a lot more often now. I just received my two 0.02% soekris dam1021's in the mail, the newest revisions. I didn't realize this version had improved onboard psu with 1000uF/16V caps now. Instead of the 820uF caps it had before. I was going to upgrade those but glad that already had been done.
I hope to get a lot of good advice on how to get My dual dam1021's setup correctly with the normundss boards. I also have been talking with kevinyip about getting a display done for the front panel. I hope it's compatible with the normundss mute kit/front panel selector.
🙂
Well, I guess we have two different opinions...tnt : Se always vs. dual- mono: it can be balanced by nature ? I am confused.
I am running a push-pull tube amp with a diff.amp/pair as the next stage after the dac. so, the best balanced input signal would be a benefit. no phase splitter necessary, plus noise cancellation of the balanced signal path...
I am running a push-pull tube amp with a diff.amp/pair as the next stage after the dac. so, the best balanced input signal would be a benefit. no phase splitter necessary, plus noise cancellation of the balanced signal path...
Which caps for the DAM refs
I'm looking for caps for the ref Mod on DAM revision 2 board .
There's a bunch of varieties for polymer caps in each brand.
Final choice would be between these 2 :
PLE series or RS8 series
The first one has better ESR (5mohm) but the second has better ESL (lower inductance) while still having a good ESR (8mohm).
I would suppose that lower inductance would be good at such location looking at the very irregular drawn current.
What would be your choice ? One of these or another flavor ? 😉
Laurent
I'm looking for caps for the ref Mod on DAM revision 2 board .
There's a bunch of varieties for polymer caps in each brand.
Final choice would be between these 2 :
PLE series or RS8 series
The first one has better ESR (5mohm) but the second has better ESL (lower inductance) while still having a good ESR (8mohm).
I would suppose that lower inductance would be good at such location looking at the very irregular drawn current.
What would be your choice ? One of these or another flavor ? 😉
Laurent
dual mono dam1021 is indeed natively balanced. You will find greatly improved performance on certain amps that only accept a balanced signal, for instance the nc400's just seem to outright have more dynamic range and noticeable lower volume listening improvements.
spike, I haberead through most of your posts and setup, but can you do me a favour and explain a bit more how your setup works precisely ? I would love actually to avoid a usb-receiver and connect the clocks from the soekris board back to a bbb and have a direct i2s connection, but all of that in dual-mono and fully balanced.
Has anyone tried direct i2s connection? Based on what configuration (the I2S source) and how's the result compare to isolated I2S of the same configuration? I'd like to explore the possibility of such and know how to connect the 3 wires. Thanks
bambadoo,
when the DAM1121 will available
Can told use more Detail?
Thanks
- Home
- Vendor's Bazaar
- Reference DAC Module - Discrete R-2R Sign Magnitude 24 bit 384 KHz