Question for engineers about enclosure stiffness

Hi all,

I was wondering if a hollow cube or rectangular prism (like speaker enclosure) made of MDF or HDF walls of sufficiently high thickness, would at a certain minimum thickness show no measurable benefit from internal bracing regardless of frequency range and typical SPL requirements?

Thickness would be proportional to box size.

Assume there is a sub woofer in the enclosure.

Greets!

Absolutely!

Understand though that stiffness goes up at the cube of thickness, so with confirmed Ga. Pacific MOE specs ~ two decades ago now:

~ 3/4" marine, BB, etc., ply = ~1.8 mil psi

~3/4" MDF = ~527 k psi

[0.75*[1.8/.527]^0.33] = 1.125" thick

With increasing box size then, you're ~ quickly moving into cast iron construction heavy to raise a sub's box resonance up the/[my] desired one octave minimum.

In short, start with the lightest, highest MOE material you can afford; that or go the opposite as some have done [me included to save $$, effort] and epoxy/whatever concrete, granite or similar pieces together and use [some of] the savings on a good appliance hand truck 😉.
 
The reason Australians would be saying that plywood is hard to find is because audio forums are echo chambers that have drummed up that birch ply is some sort of godlike speaker box building material that nothing else can surpass.

Birch ply is not commonly found in Australian hardware stores as it is an imported product and hardware stores usually stock mostly local wood. The ply that is easy to find is structural so it generally looks like ***.

I just make enclosures out of MDF. Most bang for buck and with some thought put into bracing they don't need to have thick walls or weigh 100kg. Easier to paint than ply.
 
Last edited:
... echo chambers that have drummed up that birch ply is some sort of godlike speaker box building material that nothing else can surpass.

The actual material the plywood is made from is much less important than the construction detail and execution. BB is often quoted as it is an example of a (usually) quality plywood widely available.

Stiff & light is preferred. No voids. Lots of plies.

dave
 
It is also ~$250 a sheet, like birch.

At prices like that i would be looking at bamboo. We paid les sthan $100/sheet for the quality plywood we used at the end (Murphy ply), which was about double the cheap Russian BB we abandoned after quality went downhill.

Still, after all the drivers and all the laboutr likely still worth the price over MDF/HDF (which we could have pretty much as much as we would need for $0)

dave
 
Nothing in Australia is inexpensive especially locally produced items 😡

The price and quality available depends heavily on where you are located. I was regional for a long time and everything had to be shipped usually at a similar cost to value of the item.

Now I live within driving distance of DMK Forrest products and I can buy Finnish Birch at quite reasonable prices. The price of a sheet of 18mm is about $150 AUD which is a little more than 100USD at the current exchange rate.

The Hoop Pine ply is similar or more expensive if a higher finish grade is desired. Having bought both the birch is better.

Imported Marine ply from the big hardware stores was about the same price when I bought a sheet, it's OK but not as nice as the Birch if it is available.
 

Attachments

  • IMG20210528165903.jpg
    IMG20210528165903.jpg
    928.8 KB · Views: 160
  • WISA Birch.png
    WISA Birch.png
    396.7 KB · Views: 170
  • Austral Hoop Pine.png
    Austral Hoop Pine.png
    406.1 KB · Views: 160
Bummer! 🙁 I assumed the economic 'landscape' had changed considerably since the early '70s when the then Cutler-Hammer Corp. was considering moving me to a plant down in Sydney, but then wife nixed it.

Oh well, there's always fiberglass and paper mache. 😉
 
Right, Down Under, I imagine no void marine grade ply like I've used would be in abundance, hence maybe comparatively inexpensive.

Yep - not sold as "marine" but functionally similar.

Top bit (sanding block) is a scrap of cheap, locally made construction ply - formply for concrete work.

The bottom ply is the remnants of a JBL cab that I butchered for parts.

The plywood in the JBL box is perfectly adequate, but clearly has fewer layers and more flaws.

The cheap formwork stuff has the same structural properties (stiffness:weight etc) as $$ imported birch. It is also waterproof enough that timber yards simply store it outside, exposed to the weather.

I use formply outside. It ignores rain. It takes a couple before the (unsealed) edges begin to show any weathering. If I waxed the cut edges, they'd probably last ~forever.
 

Attachments

  • ply and ply.jpg
    ply and ply.jpg
    922.2 KB · Views: 189
Like everything there are variations available that may or may not be the same. Bunnings is selling a 17mm F14 grade Formply made out of Radiata Pine for $88. Your sample looks more like hardwood and very similar to the imported Marine Ply Bunnings sells. There is quite a difference between that and a good quality Birch ply. Whether it is worth the extra will depend on the application. One thing to look out for is that hardwood ply with a high number of plies will tend to stay straighter for longer without weight on it. The Pine plywood starts to banana very quickly even the expensive Hoop Pine stuff.
 
" Bunnings is selling a 17mm F14 grade Formply"

They used to sell F17, but appear to be out of stock. You can still get it from multiple places - Plyco, Big River, Allcon, Bowen's...

Some of them sell it without the black phenolic face (e.g. for flooring).

"There is quite a difference between that and a good quality Birch ply"

If two sheets are both labelled as "F17", then they have been measured by Official Clever People and found to have similar engineering properties - including stiffness, which is the heading of this thread.

Structural grading | WoodSolutions
 
If two sheets are both labelled as "F17", then they have been measured by Official Clever People and found to have similar engineering properties - including stiffness, which is the heading of this thread.
Very true none of this has much to do with the thread title. My point was that products can be rated the same for structural strength and yet be quite different. Softwood being different to hardwood in how it cuts, bends and holds fasteners which might be quite relevant to how well it holds up in the long term as a cabinet choice.
 
The picture of the formply in post 31 looks very nice. I would have no qualms about using that as a cabinet material. Any plywood that has a lot of ply layers and is internally void free is very suitable. I use baltic birch because in my region it is easy to get and not expensive. In December I bought 3 sheets. The price for a 60" x 60" (1524mm x 1524mm) 18mm/13 ply sheet was $55 US.

j.
 
...MDF or HDF walls of sufficiently high thickness, would at a certain minimum thickness show no measurable benefit from internal bracing<snip>?
This seems to be a difficult question as no one has really taken a stab at putting numbers on it. Although I have not made any real tests of this, in my experience layers of very high quality plywood in the range of 40-50mm thick results in minimal box or baffle talk. That would be in boxes of 300-600 liters. Minimal, but sturdy, bracing used. 30-40mm of MDF seem to be the minimum for deadness on an open baffle were there is no box pressure.

Those are just observations from builds I have done or listened to. No real data, just empirical observation.
 
One thing to look out for is that hardwood ply with a high number of plies will tend to stay straighter for longer without weight on it.

Right, the marine grade I've used were all 13 ply, while the recommended BB ply that is sold locally is 'only' 11 ply, though is cheaper and IIRC Tom D. said his subs were 13 ply.