power amplifier under development
hi qsa
greetings long time since your circuit has been posted can
you please give wattage of resistances used then it can be tried
out very interested have most parts is it being tested bye
thanking you
andrew lebon
hi qsa
greetings long time since your circuit has been posted can
you please give wattage of resistances used then it can be tried
out very interested have most parts is it being tested bye
thanking you
andrew lebon
Hi
I want say thank you to quasi for ideas and design....
I want add my ideas in Nmos for powerful audiophil Pa amplifier and share experience with all people which interested to build
I have update schematic and finished PCB today
@andrewlebon
please send me email
does anybody have idea to improve or find any faults in design ?
I cant upload PCB design to share because its to big, if somebody interest email me
I want say thank you to quasi for ideas and design....
I want add my ideas in Nmos for powerful audiophil Pa amplifier and share experience with all people which interested to build
I have update schematic and finished PCB today
@andrewlebon
please send me email
does anybody have idea to improve or find any faults in design ?
I cant upload PCB design to share because its to big, if somebody interest email me
Attachments
Hi,
convert the output Thiele Network to a Pi filter.
Add a 8r2 or 10r with a series 47pF cap before the inductor and to ground. Keep this part of the Pi filter very close to the output stage devices and a short route to the power ground.
Try changing R60 & R61 from 10r to 3r9.
This last R+C part of the Pi filter can go across the speaker terminals.
The inductor//resistor can be located where convenient, anywhere between the first part of the Pi and the last part of the Pi.
This is a change from my previous recommendation but, I've not tested it thoroughly yet.
There's something seriously wrong with the protection.
You have an arrangement suited to fully complementary output stage and the sense point from the output line should be from the source of the output FETs.
Are the diode string D12 to D16 and C19 tapped into the correct locations?
What about protection Zeners for the FET gates?
convert the output Thiele Network to a Pi filter.
Add a 8r2 or 10r with a series 47pF cap before the inductor and to ground. Keep this part of the Pi filter very close to the output stage devices and a short route to the power ground.
Try changing R60 & R61 from 10r to 3r9.
This last R+C part of the Pi filter can go across the speaker terminals.
The inductor//resistor can be located where convenient, anywhere between the first part of the Pi and the last part of the Pi.
This is a change from my previous recommendation but, I've not tested it thoroughly yet.
There's something seriously wrong with the protection.
You have an arrangement suited to fully complementary output stage and the sense point from the output line should be from the source of the output FETs.
Are the diode string D12 to D16 and C19 tapped into the correct locations?
What about protection Zeners for the FET gates?
I'd do it the other way round - RC on amp side, and maybe a smallish cap on output side.
R+C and L//R values can be tuned to make the impedance seen from the amp be load independent at high frequencies with this configuration - without peak or dip at the turnover frequency of the filter.
R+C and L//R values can be tuned to make the impedance seen from the amp be load independent at high frequencies with this configuration - without peak or dip at the turnover frequency of the filter.
power amplifier under development
hi qsa
greetings thanks for the reply glad progress is being made
can you tell me a substitute for 2sd 669 very hard to find have got
all parts my E MAIL Address lebonandrea@yahoo.com thanks
thanking you
andrew lebon
hi qsa
greetings thanks for the reply glad progress is being made
can you tell me a substitute for 2sd 669 very hard to find have got
all parts my E MAIL Address lebonandrea@yahoo.com thanks
thanking you
andrew lebon
power amplifier under development
hi qsa
greetings hows the amplifiers progress need substitute only
for 2sd669 my e mail address lebonandrea@yahoo.com. can you
give wattage of all resistances used
thanking you
andrew lebon
hi qsa
greetings hows the amplifiers progress need substitute only
for 2sd669 my e mail address lebonandrea@yahoo.com. can you
give wattage of all resistances used
thanking you
andrew lebon
try to use MJE340 for 2SD669A, it should work
Resistors: R16 is 2 Watt, power Devices resistors 5W, all another 0,6W
queck your email
I have send you final Beta PCB Layout
I will add today overheat protect
Attachment: upgrade NMOS MKII 130V with additional Short Circuit Protect and Clip Limit
Does anybody find faults in design ?
Resistors: R16 is 2 Watt, power Devices resistors 5W, all another 0,6W
queck your email
I have send you final Beta PCB Layout
I will add today overheat protect
Attachment: upgrade NMOS MKII 130V with additional Short Circuit Protect and Clip Limit
Does anybody find faults in design ?
Attachments
A few questions...
1. T18 C and E should be swapped. It won't work this way
2. I don't understand your protection circuit around T14 and T15. It seems it is attached to nothing except output and power supply lines. Maybe a simple I (current) limiter should be enough since you are using robust MOSFET output.
3. Did you simulate this circuit, is it stable?
1. T18 C and E should be swapped. It won't work this way
2. I don't understand your protection circuit around T14 and T15. It seems it is attached to nothing except output and power supply lines. Maybe a simple I (current) limiter should be enough since you are using robust MOSFET output.
3. Did you simulate this circuit, is it stable?
d669 for T10 is the wrong choice of transistor.
2SD669 is a driver.
You need a transistor that performs well with a low Ic.
Any small signal transistor would do, or a low wattage (To126) VAS or pre-driver, with high hFE and high fT at the operational current of ~4mA, even an SMD sot23 transistor would be better glued to the driver transistor heatsink.
Your protection on the negative rail is copied from a fully complementary output stage.
This is a quasi complementary output stage.
It is completely inappropriate.
2SD669 is a driver.
You need a transistor that performs well with a low Ic.
Any small signal transistor would do, or a low wattage (To126) VAS or pre-driver, with high hFE and high fT at the operational current of ~4mA, even an SMD sot23 transistor would be better glued to the driver transistor heatsink.
Your protection on the negative rail is copied from a fully complementary output stage.
This is a quasi complementary output stage.
It is completely inappropriate.
@AndrewT
I have copy protection from BJT quasi complementary Output Stage, I m surprised that it is completely inappropriate with Nmos
look original schematic PDF
against 2SD669 is a driver
ok its true, but I have different BJT PA Amplifier with this device as VBE and its working very stable, why not in NMOS ?
regards
Peter
I have copy protection from BJT quasi complementary Output Stage, I m surprised that it is completely inappropriate with Nmos
look original schematic PDF
against 2SD669 is a driver
ok its true, but I have different BJT PA Amplifier with this device as VBE and its working very stable, why not in NMOS ?
regards
Peter
Attachments
power amplifier under development
hi qsa
greetings thank you for sending component layout there
are red tracks and blue tracks is the pcb double sided every thing
else seems ok will keep you iinformed bye
thanking you
andrew lebon
hi qsa
greetings thank you for sending component layout there
are red tracks and blue tracks is the pcb double sided every thing
else seems ok will keep you iinformed bye
thanking you
andrew lebon
Hi, its BETA
please wait for the final design, I found yesterday fault,
I cand send you file for PCB Supplier to produce sample
please wait for the final design, I found yesterday fault,
I cand send you file for PCB Supplier to produce sample
Hi qsa,
The way you have re-designed the output stage driver has 2 major problems.
1. You have inserted a FET driver stage for the output. This increases your positive rail losses to at least 8 volts (4 volts at the driver stage and 4 volts at the output stage). This is likely to be 10 volts or more under heavy power. The original design loses 4 to 5 volts because of the transistor driver stage and this has attracted some criticism in terms of efficiency.
2. It seems you understand well that FETs are a voltage driven device by including the 10 ohm resistor on the source of the driver FETs T21 & T22. The voltage across this resistor needs to be about 4 volts in order for the output stage to turn on and for some output bias current to be achieved. But in your design this amounts to 400mA of current. The number of FETs you have decided to use indicates rails of +/- 100v or more so the power dissipation of the driver stage will be no less than 80 watts (yes just the driver stage). Add to this the dissipation of the output stage which would be no less than 40 watts and you have 120 watts of dissipation at idle. This is too much unless you have enormous heatsinks meaning an impractical amp. In my design the driver stage sinks about 18mA and it works fine.
Cheers
Q
The way you have re-designed the output stage driver has 2 major problems.
1. You have inserted a FET driver stage for the output. This increases your positive rail losses to at least 8 volts (4 volts at the driver stage and 4 volts at the output stage). This is likely to be 10 volts or more under heavy power. The original design loses 4 to 5 volts because of the transistor driver stage and this has attracted some criticism in terms of efficiency.
2. It seems you understand well that FETs are a voltage driven device by including the 10 ohm resistor on the source of the driver FETs T21 & T22. The voltage across this resistor needs to be about 4 volts in order for the output stage to turn on and for some output bias current to be achieved. But in your design this amounts to 400mA of current. The number of FETs you have decided to use indicates rails of +/- 100v or more so the power dissipation of the driver stage will be no less than 80 watts (yes just the driver stage). Add to this the dissipation of the output stage which would be no less than 40 watts and you have 120 watts of dissipation at idle. This is too much unless you have enormous heatsinks meaning an impractical amp. In my design the driver stage sinks about 18mA and it works fine.
Cheers
Q
Hi quasi,
I did mistake sorry, have update schematic, add short circuit protection, Crowbar speaker protection and replace old MJE 340/350 with MJE15034/15035 fT is much more metter = 30 MHZ compare to old devices
I think it should work now...
does anbody find major faults ?
I did mistake sorry, have update schematic, add short circuit protection, Crowbar speaker protection and replace old MJE 340/350 with MJE15034/15035 fT is much more metter = 30 MHZ compare to old devices
I think it should work now...
does anbody find major faults ?
Attachments
I still fail to understand what are T15 and T16 used for. Could you explain what do they do, please?
I wish he would explain it.
I think it's an incorrectly implemented attempt to add protection to a Quasi amplifier, when he doesn't know how a Quasi differs from a complementary.
I think it's an incorrectly implemented attempt to add protection to a Quasi amplifier, when he doesn't know how a Quasi differs from a complementary.
Hi Andrew T,
Sorry when T15 and T16 incorrectly implemented protection, but I see this in commercial quasi Amplifier with BJT devices from 80s, i thought its a good idea to add in Nmos because its a quasi amp too
Could you assist me or send me by email important changes for stable working ?
Sorry when T15 and T16 incorrectly implemented protection, but I see this in commercial quasi Amplifier with BJT devices from 80s, i thought its a good idea to add in Nmos because its a quasi amp too
Could you assist me or send me by email important changes for stable working ?
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Solid State
- Power amp under development