OPENAMP1 - MM phono preamp open project

Hi there,

Looking into my drawers, I have found (some decades old) Opa124 and OP27.
Wolud they be usable (in any position) in Openamp1?
Also, having some Op07 ( for dc servo), does it make difference (again, in this posoIion) between OP177 or OPA134?
Thanks,
T.
 
Question:
In reference to post#60
"above 1kHz the noise in MM preamp is dominated by the 47k standardized load resistor"
Does this technique reduce the noise caused by the loading resistor? Has anyone tried this?

I use "passive cooling" 150k/25pF input instead of 47k\150pF for both lowering noise and also widening freq resp with budget MM


Detailed see here https://www.patreon.com/posts/mm-constant-loop-67857060
 
Just finished building Opanamp1 using pcb from craigtone. Using Jung/Didden Superreg for the PS. Will listen for a few days and post my findings.

Question:
In reference to post#60
"above 1kHz the noise in MM preamp is dominated by the 47k standardized load resistor"

The following phono preamp uses what they call "electronic termination" or "“Electronic Cooling” and according to this whitepaper it reduces the input noise by (in the limit) 13.28 dB
whitepaper:
www.akitika.com/documents/ElectronicCooling.pdf
schematic:
www.akitika.com/documents/SchematicPhonoPreampRevB4.pdf


Does this technique reduce the noise caused by the loading resistor? Has anyone tried this?

Apologies for the late reply... I use it all the time, but that 13.28 dB from the whitepaper is when you only look at the noise contribution of the termination resistor. It's more like 3 dB when you take the cartridge thermal noise into account, including iron losses. It gets even smaller when you account for other noise sources such as amplifier voltage noise and record surface noise, but then again, termination resistor noise and cartridge iron losses thermal noise mainly contribute to high frequency noise that sounds more annoying than lower frequency noise.

See also "Noise and moving-magnet cartridges", Electronics World October 2003, pages 38...43, https://worldradiohistory.com/UK/Wireless-World/00s/Electronics-World-2003-10-S-OCR.pdf Mind you, Electronics World drew one of the sections of the gain switch in the wrong state in figure 5 and I mixed up the terms spectral density and power spectral density. It's a technique from 1939, by the way.

Nick's alternative is very interesting if you don't mind building the amplifier into the turntable and if you don't have a cartridge with a strong mechanical resonance. It improves noise as well as frequency response.
 
I build this preamp just for fun on test pcb with a zener regulated linear power supply with +-12V rails, and I was blown away how good it performs. Fast, precise, good separation, good soundstage, and very transparent sound, and it sounds better than my Project DS3B...
I'm using it with a Nagaoka MP-200 MM cartridge mounted on Project RPM1.
 
All, thank you for your comments in this thread. I have recently created a document on MM preamp testing with respect to noise under real world conditions with a MM cartridge, a kind of comparison between measurements with low output impedance generator versus MM cartridge connected to the input. The differences are big. For those interested, below is the link.

https://pmacura.cz/MMpre_measuring_methods.pdf
 
Interesting, I didn't know ASR also measured phono preamplifier noise incorrectly, like Stereophile and Elektor and some Japanese standard.

For some reason the measured noise around 10 kHz with FET op-amp and cartridge is less than the simulated noise, while the simulation does not include iron losses. Is this close to the resonance of the cartridge with the load capacitance perhaps? Near resonance, iron losses may reduce the impedance peak.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PMA
They do, unfortunately, and when I started to explain they do it wrong I got a 2 weeks ban 😊.
For some reason the measured noise around 10 kHz with FET op-amp and cartridge is less than the simulated noise,
Yes, I have noticed it as well. But the resonance is higher, rather close to 20kHz.

BTW, I have extremely short wires from cartridge to the input terminals, as shown on the thumbnail below.

openamp_testsetup.JPG
 
At 10 kHz, a bit less than 1.5 dB can maybe be explained with iron losses and differences in capacitance between simulation and reality.

Assuming that termination resistor losses and iron losses dominate at 10 kHz and that the iron losses can be modelled with an extra parallel 47 kohm resistor (very rough estimate), and neglecting everything else:

Measurement:
425 mH and 20 kHz resonant frequency -> 149.0017407 pF of parallel capacitance

Susceptance at 10 kHz: B = 2πfC - 1/(2πfL) ~= -28.08616643 j uS

With 47 kohm parallel resistance:
G = (1/47000) S

Effective series resistance:
R = G/(G2 + B2) ~= 17.13745109 kohm

With 23.5 kohm (that is, including guesstimated iron losses): effective series resistance 16.3690873 kohm

Simulation:

Capacitance 250 pF
Susceptance -21.74025864 j uS
With 47 kohm: effective series resistance 22.99346309 kohm

10 dB • 10log(22.993... kohm/16.369... kohm) ~= 1.475799212 dB
 
  • Like
Reactions: hbtaudio and PMA
I see that the phase goes to about +80 degrees, rather than +90 degrees. The impedance of the Shure V15-III that a former colleague of mine once measured had a maximum phase of about +72 degrees.

Attempting to read off the values at 10 kHz:
23 kohm, 78 degrees

4.781968889 kohm + 22.49739482 j kohm

9.039638731 uS - 42.52815655 j uS

Equivalent to 110.6238899 kohm in parallel with 374.2342862 mH at 10 kHz.

Apparently your cartridge has considerably less iron losses than my guesstimate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hbtaudio
Cartridge in parallel with 47 kohm and 149.0017407 pF:

30.31623448 uS - 33.16610107 j uS

effective series resistance 15.01499183 kohm

Recalculating the ESR at 10 kHz of the simulation model, now including the 970 ohm and 425 mH of the cartridge model and the 47 kohm with 250 pF:
23.03022064 kohm

10 dB • 10log(23.03022... kohm/15.0149... kohm) ~= 1.857729985 dB

A bit more difference than in post #235.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hbtaudio