• These commercial threads are for private transactions. diyAudio.com provides these forums for the convenience of our members, but makes no warranty nor assumes any responsibility. We do not vet any members, use of this facility is at your own risk. Customers can post any issues in those threads as long as it is done in a civil manner. All diyAudio rules about conduct apply and will be enforced.

non-profit ver.3 TDA1541a DAC for limited budget diyers

Status
Not open for further replies.
rtd said:
Hi Thomas and all,

I replace J6 and J4, they all now produce 5v.

On the CS8414 without no signal, VD+ is 5v, VA+ is 5v too (P22).
P19 is 4.5v and P11 an P12 are 0V.

TDA1541 and Opamp is getting normally hot
CS8414 remains cold

(test made with Jp4 short, jp5 short, SA + Reclock off, M0=M2=M3=5v on CS8414 and M1 = 0V, that must be nos mode.
i precise because i replace S2)

So maybe CS8414 is broken but how can i be sure ? I don't want buy another one if not.

Thanks,

Hi Thomas,

Hope you're feeling well. To continue have u got some CS8414 or better CS8412 left ( so that not to solder SMD) and give me the price.
( here or by mp)

thanks,
 
Hi there ! Another Frenchie with us even if i don't leave in my own country ! 😉 Well, i have heared about this nice thread and try to follow now, hoping i will be able to catch one of them... I am building mi Hi-fi system only in DIY an some of us told me it's missing one DAC. So, i am here !!!!😀
 
Post 1123 shows my version of a tube output for this dac.
You will also find additionnal information in previous posts.

I had tried the Nelson Pass FET i/v stage which works beautifully with this dac. If I remember well, Pass did not accept that Thomas uses his i/v with the present dac.
So I designed this tube stage as an alternative to Nelson's i/v.
Both FET i/v and the tube section produce excellent sound.
It will require a bit more skill since I did not produce a printed circuit board for it. So, point to point construction is the technique to use. The effort is well worthed because you will love the results.

I have 4 or 5 dacs here for comparaison, but this is the one I listen to, every day.

Jean=Charles
 
Hi Jean-Charles

Thanx! It shure looks like something i might try. You schematic looks easy enoufgh for me 🙂

What kind of resistors is used? normal metalfilms?

Also by every resistor there is a "1" and a "2".. What is the reason for this?

Do you have some pictures of your currant Dac? 🙂

Thanx!

/Z
 
Hi Zei,

The 1 and 2 are present with every parts. They are introduced by the Orcad software, to be used for routing in the Layout section of the same software. They are of no interest here.

I used regular metal film resistors, that is what I had.
Caddock MK132 resistors could be a good choice. There are only a few, so it should not raise the price by much.
Frankly, I did not use Caddocks myself, yet. One day, if I decide to house everything in a decent cabinet, I may introduce these upgrades.

The only photo that I have is posted in #1107. There you have, side by side, both the Pass FET i/v and my tube stage.

The project is still experimental and offerered to those who would like to use a tube output for this particular dac.
Since Thomas produced a limited number of dacs, it is not my intention to go a long road with this stage.

Jean-Charles
 
Jean-Charles.
Thanx for the support. 🙂

I realy like this DAC and it presents a new dimension to my current setup.

The tube output stage is just cause i,m curious to see what kind of differences i might spot (If any) 🙂

May i ask what you would recomend of the two outputstages?
The Pass thing or yours? 😎

Also if i would try the Pass stage, is there anything i should think of ?

Sry for all questions..


/Z
 
Zei,
I have tried both. Personnaly I only use the tube stage now. But I remember not seeing important differences between the two.

So , my advice would be to go with Nelson's i/v because it would be easier to build and less expensive. There are individuals that offer this stage in kit form, that includes all parts and pcb.

It is well worthed to add one of these stages to Thomas's dac because it improves the performance and enhances the great qualities of this dac. It will also remove, almost completely, the clock noise I was complaining about.

I like it better with the 4X oversampling, digital filter and reclocking circuits.
It now compares very well with all the expensive dac I came accross.

Jean-Charles
 
Status
Not open for further replies.