Multi Entry Horn ElectroVoice HP6040

Hi Pelanj

Too small… yes maybe, that’s why I wrote, that I will start small 😉
The are roughly 3cm * 1cm each.


SD of the driver is 55cm², my ports have ~6cm² what is not so far away from recomandation, or is my calculation wrong?

And: what I think to know is, that the distance to the diafragma should be max. 1/4 of wavelength of highest frequency… less is no problem. Is this wrong?

If I would use same frequency range but smaller driver, ports can be small… why not, if I have a larger driver? What are the disadvantages?

Will try to have them as small as possible to make sure, that I don‘t get problems (reflections in the horn) with the tweeter.

To close to the throat (dia)… maybe, the farest point is ~14cm. so i could move them maybe another 3 cm

Christian
 
Last edited:
I was confused by the 12" dimension of the woofer - these have usually Sd of around 500 cm2 - and the holes looked (visuaĺy) like less than 1/10 of the Sd. The important distance is along the centerline of the horn. Placing the ports is a balance between highest frequency required and amount of interference with the HF. I am not sure how that would really work in the narow slot you have. If the slots are unnecessarily too close, weird stuff happens. Less than 1/4 wavelength is great, much less than does more harm than good. How much less I cannot tell. If the woofers can play high, you can increase the crossover point easily to see the influence.
 
Yes... to me it looks strange too, but here you have the sizes 😉

Christian

StrangeSize_2.PNG
 
Ahhhh…

Yes… crazy… just factor 10 😉

And welcome back to the 4“ Driver 😉

But i still have no idea, why the size of the holes depends on size of the driver and not on frequency and spl.

Is there anybody who could explain that?

Thx… especially for the hint… still unbelievable, that I made such a mistake 😉

Christian
 
Last edited:
OK... something what need to be accepted 😉

But it would be a little bit better, if i would reduce the chamber in front of the driver?

Anyway: will change back to the already advised B&C 4NDF34-16 and will use 4 of them.

Thx a lot for the help and the hint!
 
Moin 😉

I have ordered 8 of the 16 Ohm version. This way I can drive the 4 in parallel and don‘t need to make a seriell/parallel mix.

Will try to drive them down to 100Hz… because i don’t need heavy SPL and will use sharp crossover, it could work.

Update will come as soon as possible… hopefully the drivers will arrive mid of next week, so let’s hope for next weekend 😉

Christian
 
Thx!

I will make the holes a bit larger to get something between 4-5cm2

What do you mean by „more clean output capacity“? In my experience it’s better to have drivers in parallel instead of in series… so hopefully same here 😉

At the end, it will be a complete active system with DSP and FIR filter.
 
trust me xmax is about 2.4 the data is wrong. xvar is less than xmax...
Hi, have you tested both, the 8 and 16Ohm ?
If so, please say how tested..

I've always thought the specs for the 16 ohm on tlhp looked a bit bogus compared to the 8 ohm.
B&C doesn't list 16 ohm specs that I can find....nor does anyone besides TLHP...

Also have to say 4mm xmax seems a bit crazed just looking at the driver suspension....
So really curious how you came about 2.4.
 
Yes i have both here. 2.4 seams right. i can get the right datasheet if you like.
The 8 Ohm Variant has an xvar of 5.7 and that controlled. The 16 ohm xvar of 3mm

but you can also calculate xmax from winding and magnet gab

i think looking at half the xvar 6 db less is possible