One more "secret" of this design is, attention to transients and all results of overloadings. Selection of working currents may seem weird if not to understand the design criteria.
janneman said:
OK I'll wait, see if anyone else picks it up...
I did pick up a parcel yesterday. Thank you Johannes for one more birthday in the year; but I have to figure out how to use your PCBs. Probably I'll build something for the BA festival using your boards, Scott's ICs, and Nelson's speakers. 😉
john curl said:The real 'secret' behind the success of this design is because it has a 20KHz, open loop bandwidth. I know that many of you will hiss at this, but it is true, nevertheless.
According to his article, the open-loop bandwidth of this design is 1 MHz (!). The article says that the -3 dB point of the loop gain is 100 kHz, determined by the input lag compensation network.
john curl said:The real 'secret' behind the success of this design is because it has a 20KHz, open loop bandwidth. I know that many of you will hiss at this, but it is true, nevertheless.
Just yesterday, an engineering colleague, a video engineer, has made a break-though in measurement of PIM in amps of this type. He is getting a patent, so it might be awhile before more will be divulged. I am very happy with this, as it proves what the ear has known all along, and even if Matti Otala could not completely 'prove' it in his lifetime, what he initially was trying to find, has been measured. Hurray!
Not so fast, John,
I measured PIM thoroughly 30 years ago, and did not have trouble doing it. This is nothing new (as you are so fond of saying). It just required a competent, detailed design of a custom piece of test equipment. It is fully described in the AES paper I wrote that is available on my web site at www.cordellaudio.com. You should give it a read. It's been done before, with great sensitivity.
Also take a look at my JAES MOSFET EC amp paper, where its PIM level is listed. It is extraordinarily low, in spite of a good measure of NFB (40 dB at 20 kHz, 80dB at 200 Hz).
I'll be interested to wait and see, both how the measurement is carried out, and how he measures PIM in amplifiers with and without high NFB or wide open-loop bandwidth. The instrument I designed and built to measure PIM in accordance with Otala's definition employs synchronous phase demodulation.
The nice thing about this sort of issue is that it does not rely on subjective listening tests to prove the point one way or the other. PIM is readily measurable with the right instruments, and if Otala or you assert that PIM is increased by large NFB or low open-loop bandwidth, the assertion can be checked readily by a fair apples-apples comparison of a common amplifier design with large and small amounts of negative feedback (as I did in my AES paper).
Cheers,
Bob
john curl said:[snip] It will sonically beat most better sounding amps. [snip]
I was referring to this.....😉
Anatoliy, that sounds like a great plan!
Circuit diagrams are on my website, but I will send you some stuff later.
Jan Didden
john curl said:The real 'secret' behind the success of this design is because it has a 20KHz, open loop bandwidth. I know that many of you will hiss at this, but it is true, nevertheless.
Just yesterday, an engineering colleague, a video engineer, has made a break-though in measurement of PIM in amps of this type. He is getting a patent, so it might be awhile before more will be divulged. I am very happy with this, as it proves what the ear has known all along, and even if Matti Otala could not completely 'prove' it in his lifetime, what he initially was trying to find, has been measured. Hurray!
BTW, John,
Please email me the name and email address of your colleague so that I can make him aware of the relevant prior art for measuring PIM, which he has an obligation to cite in his patent application 🙂.
Cheers,
Bob
janneman said:
Anatoliy, that sounds like a great plan!
Circuit diagrams are on my website, but I will send you some stuff later.
Thanks Jan! 😉
Yesterday was indeed my birthday: after resistors burst in flame I've designed nice steroids for tube output stages. I can't reveal details because it is a gold mine and I am going to patent it, sorry. Even though I feel an itching to share what I made.
Speaking of PIM, they again are less audible when single ended amp produce them (think of Doppler!), and sound worse when very non-linear capacitances are allowed to impact on "what we don't measure". Designing my gear I was always aware of such things, though it is not my credo to write articles and compete for inventions. Who understands can see that on my schematics, who don't anyway would not value properly.
Happy birthday Wavebourn! (delayed)
Gemini, Polish: noted. 🙂
Unfortunately, I know very little about audio electronics to propose your name for Lineup's List. 😀
Regards,
M
Gemini, Polish: noted. 🙂
Unfortunately, I know very little about audio electronics to propose your name for Lineup's List. 😀
Regards,
M
janneman said:
1973.
Jan Didden
Seems first mention was 1970 in IEEE Transactions:
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=1162117
Not saying I agree with his claims.
maxlorenz said:Happy birthday Wavebourn! (delayed)
Gemini, Polish: noted. 🙂
Thank you!
Actually, there will be one more, October, 30. This time I got a present from Jan Didden, and invented something that took my breath out. Something to make vacuum tubes 50 times more powerful, more linear, with smooth current limit and temperature stable, very simple! 😎
john curl said:Good, as long is it is not negative feedback!![]()
And a negative feedbacks as well, 3 of them, very sneaky. But they are very local, though, no need for any frequency compensation. You may count one more inside of the tube, if to think about the tube itself. Also, a feed-through approach that I always prefer. 3 MOSFETs total per tube, minimum.
andy_c said:
According to his article, the open-loop bandwidth of this design is 1 MHz (!). The article says that the -3 dB point of the loop gain is 100 kHz, determined by the input lag compensation network.
Hi Andy
If you wan't to have a play, here is my *.asc file:
G.Kleinschmidt said:Hi Andy
If you wan't to have a play, here is my *.asc file:
Thanks Glen, Is the file OK? Seems to be empty.
regards
john curl said:It will sonically beat most better sounding amps.
John, this statement contradicts itself?
scott wurcer said:
John, this statement contradicts itself?
Sense of humor means health is getting better! 😉
You probably did not see one more good joke, about "Beta does not matter" 😀
maxlorenz said:Happy birthday Wavebourn! (delayed)
Gemini, Polish: noted. 🙂
Unfortunately, I know very little about audio electronics to propose your name for Lineup's List. 😀
Regards,
M
Hi Max,
I really appriciate your Youtube contributions, Muck's Parsifal is without equal.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Solid State
- Matti Otala - An Amplifier Milestone. Dead or Alive